본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고려중기 東神聖母의 재해석과 仙桃聖母

Re-imagining of the Dongshin Seongmo(東神聖母) Concept during the Goryeo Dynasty’s Middle Period, and Seondo Seongmo(仙桃聖母)

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Examined in this article is how in the middle period of the Goryeo dynasty the Spiritual Mother(Shinmo, 神母) of the Seondo-san(仙桃山) mountain came to replace Madame Yuhwa(柳花) to be perceived as the Holy Mother(聖母) of Dongshin(東神), and what was the meaning of such perceptional change. Yuhwa was a figure who was known to have had given birth to Jumong(朱蒙), the founder king of the Goguryeo dynasty. She was a symbolic figure, representing the very beginning of the History of the Eastern country(Korea). She was revered accordingly, but later, the Goryeo government intended to separate itself from the legacy of Goguryeo, as we can surmise from the publication of Samguk Sagi (History of the Three Ancient Dynasties), and as a result of such intentions, memorial services that have been held for her over the years were finally discontinued. Kim Bu-shik, author of Samguk Sagi, regarded the Mt. Seondo’s Spiritual Mother (instead of Yuhwa) as the one who gave birth to the King that originated the history of Haedong(海東始主), and modified Yuhwa’s story by merging it with the mythical tale of Saso(娑蘇), who as a daughter of a Chinese emperor actually came to the Korean peninsula. In other words, Kim literally invented another Holy Mother, and it was not unlike other previous examples of such sort, as Yuhwa herself had originally been a Goguryeo-based agricultural deity then was turned into a Holy figure, and Jeong’gyeon-moju(正見母主), who earlier was a mountain god of Mt. Gaya, later came to be regarded as the First mother of the Dae-Gaya state. The reason the Spiritual Mother of Mt. Seondo was chosen to replace Madame Yuhwa was because she was a figure with historical relevance to the Park line of the Shilla royal family. And that replacement led to another belief that it was her (Mt. Seondo’s Spiritual Mother) who gave birth to (Shilla’s founder) Hyeokgeose. But in the end, such belief had little impact on the real world, and Mt. Seondo’s Spiritual Mother failed to acquire the status or narrative as a Holy Mother. Later it ended up being regarded as a traditional guardian spirit for the region.

Abstract

Examined in this article is how in the middle period of the Goryeo dynasty the Spiritual Mother(Shinmo, 神母) of the Seondo-san(仙桃山) mountain came to replace Madame Yuhwa(柳花) to be perceived as the Holy Mother(聖母) of Dongshin(東神), and what was the meaning of such perceptional change. Yuhwa was a figure who was known to have had given birth to Jumong(朱蒙), the founder king of the Goguryeo dynasty. She was a symbolic figure, representing the very beginning of the History of the Eastern country(Korea). She was revered accordingly, but later, the Goryeo government intended to separate itself from the legacy of Goguryeo, as we can surmise from the publication of Samguk Sagi (History of the Three Ancient Dynasties), and as a result of such intentions, memorial services that have been held for her over the years were finally discontinued. Kim Bu-shik, author of Samguk Sagi, regarded the Mt. Seondo’s Spiritual Mother (instead of Yuhwa) as the one who gave birth to the King that originated the history of Haedong(海東始主), and modified Yuhwa’s story by merging it with the mythical tale of Saso(娑蘇), who as a daughter of a Chinese emperor actually came to the Korean peninsula. In other words, Kim literally invented another Holy Mother, and it was not unlike other previous examples of such sort, as Yuhwa herself had originally been a Goguryeo-based agricultural deity then was turned into a Holy figure, and Jeong’gyeon-moju(正見母主), who earlier was a mountain god of Mt. Gaya, later came to be regarded as the First mother of the Dae-Gaya state. The reason the Spiritual Mother of Mt. Seondo was chosen to replace Madame Yuhwa was because she was a figure with historical relevance to the Park line of the Shilla royal family. And that replacement led to another belief that it was her (Mt. Seondo’s Spiritual Mother) who gave birth to (Shilla’s founder) Hyeokgeose. But in the end, such belief had little impact on the real world, and Mt. Seondo’s Spiritual Mother failed to acquire the status or narrative as a Holy Mother. Later it ended up being regarded as a traditional guardian spirit for the region.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 鄭求福, "高句麗의 ‘高麗’ 國號에 대한 一考: 三國史記의 기록과 관련하여", 湖西史學, 19·20, pp.63~65 (1992)
  2. 윤경진, "고려의 건국과 고구려계승의식 -‘弓裔의 高麗’에 대한 인식을 중심으로-", 한국문화, (68), pp.143~179 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  3. 윤경진, "고려중기 고구려계승의식의 변화와 ‘句高麗’", 역사와 실학, (72), pp.71~111 (2020), 역사실학회
  4. 윤경진, "고려시대 東神聖母 숭배의 연원과 의미", 한국문화, (93), pp.173~201 (2021), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  5. 손진태, "朝鮮民族文化의 硏究" (1948), 乙酉文化社
  6. 金俊基, "神母神話 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1995
  7. 김태식, "고대 동아시아 西王母 신앙 속의 신라 仙桃山聖母", 문화사학, (27), pp.381~417 (2007), 한국문화사학회
  8. 윤미란, "선도성모 서사의 형성과 그 의미: 「仙桃聖母 隨喜佛事」(『三國遺事』 권五 감통(感通) 제七)를 중심으로", 韓國學硏究, 16 (2007)
  9. 천혜숙, "서술성모의 신화적 정체", 동아시아고대학, (16), pp.173~206 (2007), 동아시아고대학회
  10. 천혜숙, "선도성모 담론의 신화학적 조명", 구비문학연구, (26), pp.185~215 (2008), 한국구비문학회
  11. 김종군, "선도성모 설화의 변개 양상과 그 의미", 온지논총, (23), pp.43~64 (2009), 온지학회
  12. 윤혜신, "「서술산 여신 신화」와 「선도산 여신 신화」의 서사 윤곽과 구비문학적 면모", 구비문학연구, (34), pp.243~281 (2012), 한국구비문학회[DOI]
  13. 김화경, "신라 성모 신화의 연구", 민속학연구, (48), pp.5~27 (2021), 국립민속박물관[DOI]
  14. 김상기, "國史上에 나타난 建國說話의 檢討", 學術誌(건국대), 5(1) (1964)
  15. 김선주, "신라 선도성모 전승의 역사적 의미", 사학연구, (99), pp.1~33 (2010), 한국사학회
  16. 채미하, "신라의 건국신화와 국가제의", 韓國史學報, (55), pp.167~196 (2014), 고려사학회
  17. 채미하, "한국 고대 신모(神母)와 국가제의(國家祭儀) –유화와 선도산 신모를 중심으로–", 동북아역사논총, (52), pp.7~42 (2016), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
  18. 이장웅, "신라 娑蘇(仙桃聖母) 神話의 변화와 國家祭祀", 신라사학보, (38), pp.215~261 (2016), 신라사학회
  19. 김선주, "‘선도성모 수희불사’의 형성 배경과 의미", 신라사학보, (43), pp.37~66 (2018), 신라사학회
  20. 나희라, "고려시대 선도성모 이야기의 전래와 정착", 한국사연구, (194), pp.1~32 (2021), 한국사연구회[DOI]
  21. 나희라, "서술성모와 고대 한국의 여신 관념", 지방사와 지방문화, 24(2), pp.151~182 (2021), 역사문화학회
  22. 윤경진, "『三國遺事』 수록 仙桃山 神母 전승의 분석", 사림, (80), pp.1~35 (2022), 수선사학회
  23. "宣和奉使高麗圖經 권17", ~
  24. "三國史記 권12", ~
  25. "宋史", ~
  26. "北史 권94", ~
  27. 채웅석, "고려 예종대 道家思想·道敎 흥기의 정치적 성격", 한국사연구, (142), pp.105~141 (2008), 한국사연구회
  28. 최진열, "唐代 高句麗 표기 기피현상 - 隋唐 墓誌銘의 國名 표기 분석을 중심으로 -", 동북아역사논총, (38), pp.211~257 (2012), 동북아역사재단
  29. 권덕영, "唐 墓誌의 고대 한반도 삼국 명칭에 대한 검토", 한국고대사연구, (75), pp.105~138 (2014), 한국고대사학회
  30. "全唐文新編 20", ~
  31. "全唐文補遺", ~
  32. 윤경진, "신라 神武-文聖王代의 정치 변동과 三韓一統意識의 출현", 신라문화, 46, pp.207~242 (2015), 신라문화연구소
  33. 윤경진, "고려 건국기의 三韓一統意識과 ‘海東天下’ 인식", 한국중세사연구, (55), pp.237~283 (2018), 한국중세사학회[DOI]
  34. 이병도, "譯註 三國史記(上)", pp.251~ (1983), 乙酉文化社
  35. "三國遺事", ~
  36. "筆苑雜記 권1", ~
  37. 문경현, "신라건국설화의 연구", 大邱史學, 4, pp.14~ (1972)
  38. "論衡 권9", ~
  39. 金哲埈, "韓國古代社會硏究" (1975), 一志社
  40. "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
  41. 나희라, "대가야의 정신세계" (2009), 고령군 대가야박물관·계명대학교 한국학연구원
  42. "東國李相國集 권3", ~
  43. "東國李相國全集 권38", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)