학술사의 관점에서 본 『奎章總目·經部』: 『四庫全書總目·經部』와의 비교를 중심으로

Abstract

This study starts from the point of view that the academic trend of a specific period can be partially explained through the bibliography, and compares and analyzes the classification methods and books of 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)』 and 『Sikuquanshuzongmu(四庫全書總目)』. Through this, I tried to review the academic orientation of 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)』. Through the above discussion, the text draws the following conclusions. First, the compilers of 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)』 made a classification method of 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)』 by referring to the classification method of famous Chinese catalogs such as 『junzhaidushuji(郡齋讀書志)』 and 『zhizhaishulujieti(直齋書錄解題)』 while classifying the books stored in Kyujanggak. However, they did not blindly believe in the Chinese book classification method and accepted the viewpoint of the Joseon academia at the time to a certain extent, so the classification method of 『Gyujangchongmok』 came to have a certain subjectivity and independence. Therefore, when we compare the classification methods of 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)․Gyeongbu(經部)』 and 『Sikuquanshuzongmu(四庫全書總目)․Gyeongbu(經部)』, we can find certain differences even though both lists use the sibu(四部) classification method. Second, it was confirmed that 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)․Gyeongbu(經部)』 mainly contains Chinese classics in the Ming and Qing Dynasties of China, and academic interest is also in this field. At the same time, among the 78 books included in 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)․Gyeongbu(經部)』, 44 books are also included in 『Sikuquanshuzongmu(四庫全書總目)』. In other words, the proportion of books that are included in both lists at the same time reaches about 56.4%. However, there are many books that are included in 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)․Gyeongbu(經部)』 but not included in 『Sikuquanshuzongmu(四庫全書總目)』. In other words, 34 kinds of books, about 43.6% of them, are included only in 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)․Gyeongbu(經部)』. This point explains the fact that 『Kyujangchongmok(奎章總目)』 and 『Sikuquanshuzongmu(四庫全書總目)』 contain books from different perspectives. Third, 『Gyujangchongmok․Gyeongbu』 can be said to reflect the academic perspective of Joseon scholars on the Chinese books included in it. In general, it is possible to find the academic orientation of “emphasis on huizuan(彙纂) books” and “emphasis on classic interpretation of ChengZhu(程朱)”.