본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국왕이 주도하는 국가적 프로젝트의 정당화: 「農桑輯要後序」와 「農事直說序」의 비교 검토

Making a King’s Political Space: a comparison between the two prefaces

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The 「Postscript of Collection of Important Items in Agriculture and Sericulture(農桑輯要後序)」 and 「Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming(農事直說序)」 were considered and reviewed as texts containing political thoughts. The 「Postscript of Collection of Important Items in Agriculture and Sericulture」 advocates that the value of benevolence, righteousness, exclusion to heresy, and regulation of the livelihood of the people, establishing the rule of right are more important than the publication project itself or the agricultural knowledge contained in it. He also argued that he and the officials contained the value of establishing the rule of right and regulation of the livelihood of the people, which start from the exclusion to heresy. In his thoughts, kings and states were not considered. On the other hand, the 「Preface of Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming」 redefined farming as an object for sage king’s work by declaring it as a great foundation for the world and the state. Through this, the compilation of agricultural books for the promotion of agriculture followed the teachings of sage king and realized its rules. The scriptural grounds that guarantee this logic were 「Canon of Shun(舜典)」from 『ShangShu(尙書, 書經)』. King Sejong was described as a sage king who embodied the value of benevolence and righteousness, and the compilation of 『Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming』 will be one of the teachings that embody human righteousness in itself. The fact that the 「Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming」 redefined agricultural knowledge and skills as to be tought is the core of the logic that justifies the compilation project of 『Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming』. Combined with the scriptural grounds, this creates a space for the king in the political sphere related to the compilation of agricultural books.

Abstract

The 「Postscript of Collection of Important Items in Agriculture and Sericulture(農桑輯要後序)」 and 「Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming(農事直說序)」 were considered and reviewed as texts containing political thoughts. The 「Postscript of Collection of Important Items in Agriculture and Sericulture」 advocates that the value of benevolence, righteousness, exclusion to heresy, and regulation of the livelihood of the people, establishing the rule of right are more important than the publication project itself or the agricultural knowledge contained in it. He also argued that he and the officials contained the value of establishing the rule of right and regulation of the livelihood of the people, which start from the exclusion to heresy. In his thoughts, kings and states were not considered. On the other hand, the 「Preface of Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming」 redefined farming as an object for sage king’s work by declaring it as a great foundation for the world and the state. Through this, the compilation of agricultural books for the promotion of agriculture followed the teachings of sage king and realized its rules. The scriptural grounds that guarantee this logic were 「Canon of Shun(舜典)」from 『ShangShu(尙書, 書經)』. King Sejong was described as a sage king who embodied the value of benevolence and righteousness, and the compilation of 『Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming』 will be one of the teachings that embody human righteousness in itself. The fact that the 「Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming」 redefined agricultural knowledge and skills as to be tought is the core of the logic that justifies the compilation project of 『Preface of Direct Explanation of Farming』. Combined with the scriptural grounds, this creates a space for the king in the political sphere related to the compilation of agricultural books.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김용섭, "高麗刻本 《元朝正本農桑輯要》를 통해서 본 「農桑輯要」의 撰者와 資料", 東方學志, 65 (1990)
  2. 김용섭, "《農事直說》과 《四時纂要》의 木綿耕種法 증보", 東方學志, 57 (1988)
  3. 오인택, "『農桑輯要』를 통해서 본 조선 초기의 耕種法", 지역과 역사, 5 (1999)
  4. 이근수, "『農事直說』 단계에서의 水田農業", 한국의 농경문화, 3 (1991), 경기대 박물관
  5. 서정상, "《農事直說》의 農法과 老農", 泰東古典硏究, 16 (1999)
  6. 염정섭, "조선시대 농서편찬과 농법의 발달", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2000
  7. 김상태, "《農事直說》과 15세기 水田농업의 실태", 仁荷史學, 7 (1999)
  8. 김상태, "『농사직설』과 조선 초기의 농업 실태", 박사, 한국사, pp.2000
  9. 이호철, "조선전기 농법의 전통과 변화", 농업사연구, 3(1), pp.25~48 (2004), 한국농업사학회
  10. 한정수, "고려시대 농업정책과 농경의례", 한국중세사연구, (38), pp.41~73 (2014), 한국중세사학회
  11. 김상태, "『農事直說』의 편찬과 보급에 대한 재검토", 한국민족문화, (36), pp.3~35 (2010), 한국민족문화연구소
  12. 염정섭, "세종대 권농 실시와 농법 정리의 의의", 규장각, (58), pp.1~33 (2021), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  13. 문중양, "세종대 과학기술의 ‘자주성’, 다시 보기", 역사학보, (189), pp.39~72 (2006), 역사학회
  14. 김인호, "고려시대 관료의 농업관과 농민의식", 역사와 실학, (74), pp.103~135 (2021), 역사실학회
  15. "牧隱文藁", ~
  16. 도현철, "牧隱 李穡의 政治思想硏究", 韓國思想史學, 3, pp.43~45 (1990)
  17. 도현철, "한국사 시민강좌", pp.76~ (2004), 일조각
  18. 도현철, "조선건국기 성리학 지식인의 네트워크와 개혁사상", 역사학보, (240), pp.243~273 (2018), 역사학회[DOI]
  19. 현수진, "고려시대 관인상의 형성과 변화-能文‧能吏형 관인상을 중심으로-", 한국중세사연구, (51), pp.459~502 (2017), 한국중세사학회
  20. 김인호, "여말선초 군주수신론과 대학연의", 역사와 현실, 29, pp.74~79 (1998)
  21. 김영민, "중국정치사상사" (2021), 사회평론아카데미
  22. 성백효, "맹자집주", pp.41~ (2002), 전통문화연구회
  23. James Legge, "제임스 레게의 맹자 역주 제1권", pp.104~105 (2021), 도서출판3
  24. "孟子集註 양혜왕장구 상", ~
  25. "東文選 권75, 圃隱齋記", ~
  26. "고려사 권115", ~
  27. 도현철, "조선 건국기 성리학자의 불교 인식", 한국사상사학, (50), pp.33~65 (2015), 한국사상사학회
  28. "세종실록", ~
  29. "태종실록", ~
  30. "태조실록 권7", ~
  31. 장지연, "고려~조선 초 『書經』 「無逸篇」과 「洪範篇」 이해의 변화", 사학연구, (112), pp.113~156 (2013), 한국사학회
  32. 도현철, "여말선초 성리학의 수용과 문치 확대", 역사비평, (125), pp.207~237 (2018), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
  33. 현수진, "고려후기 『상서』의 정치적 활용과 그 성격", 사림, (71), pp.89~124 (2020), 수선사학회[DOI]
  34. "農事直說序", ~
  35. 염정섭, "한국문화사 27" (2009), 국사편찬위원회
  36. 이하경, "추국장에서 만난 조선후기 국가", 박사, pp.2018
  37. 임종태, "議政府의 세계지도, 「混一疆理歷代國都之圖」", 문화역사지리, 27(1), pp.1~14 (2015), 한국문화역사지리학회
  38. 정다함, "『龍飛御天歌』에 나타난 易姓革命의 구체적 서사와 그 함의", 조선시대사학보, (72), pp.7~55 (2015), 조선시대사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)