본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

日訳「中国の一日」研究

The study of a group works <One day in China> translated in japanese

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

A group works “One day in the world” proposed in the 1930s by Go Riki. However, this plan has disappeared with death of Go Riki. Then again, this group works was tried in Japan and China. It was right “One day in the East” planned by Yamaji Kishi in a “Bungaku Annai” magazine in Japan, and “One day in China” published in 1936(ShengHuo Book Store in Shanghai), planned by Mao Dun in China. These planes have the big significance in a history of literature, when I think that “One day in the world” of Go Riki was not published. This study aims of analyzing the view of crossing of all China in the 1930s by using “One day in China”(translated in Japanese). First of all, I will look into how “One day in China” was planned, edited by Mao Dun. Then, I'm going to easily look into what was different from “One day in the East” of Yamaji Kishi. The follow part, I'm going to analyze “One day in China” while comparing it with a historic fact. This study is unfinished, because it is based on the limited text of 72. However, I will think that it becomes touchstone for the study of this “One day of China” in future.

Abstract

A group works “One day in the world” proposed in the 1930s by Go Riki. However, this plan has disappeared with death of Go Riki. Then again, this group works was tried in Japan and China. It was right “One day in the East” planned by Yamaji Kishi in a “Bungaku Annai” magazine in Japan, and “One day in China” published in 1936(ShengHuo Book Store in Shanghai), planned by Mao Dun in China. These planes have the big significance in a history of literature, when I think that “One day in the world” of Go Riki was not published. This study aims of analyzing the view of crossing of all China in the 1930s by using “One day in China”(translated in Japanese). First of all, I will look into how “One day in China” was planned, edited by Mao Dun. Then, I'm going to easily look into what was different from “One day in the East” of Yamaji Kishi. The follow part, I'm going to analyze “One day in China” while comparing it with a historic fact. This study is unfinished, because it is based on the limited text of 72. However, I will think that it becomes touchstone for the study of this “One day of China” in future.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 茅盾, "中国的一日" (1936), 生活書店
  2. 中島長文, "中国の一日" (1984), 平凡社
  3. 佐野眞一, "阿片王─満州の夜と霧", pp.106~149 (2005), 新潮社
  4. 江口圭一, "十五年戦争小史", pp.102~104 (1991), 青木書店
  5. 石川禎浩, "中国近現代史③革命とナショナリズム", pp.23~205 (2010), 岩波書店
  6. 小島晋治, "中国近現代史", pp.110~137 (1988), 知識産業社
  7. 林非, "中国現代散文史", pp.22~23 (1993), 高麗院
  8. 新保敦子, "中華民国時期(1912-1949年)のおける国家統合と社会教育の研究", 박사, pp.2002
  9. 中島長文, "小さな椅子からー「中国の一日」あとがき, In 中国の一日", pp.316~339 (1983), 平凡社
  10. 岩谷將, "1930年代半ばにおける中国の国内情勢判断と対日戦略ー蔣介石の認識を中心として", 戦史研究年報, (13), pp.10~ (2010)
  11. 貴司山治, "東洋の一日, In 文学案内", pp.44~ (1936), 文学案内社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)