『文学案内』誌研究Ⅲ─報告文学の実践と集団制作『東洋の一日』

Abstract

This study aims of analyzing the literary argument of Reportage which was argued by Kishi-Yamaji and <One day in the East> as the group works which was invited public participation as the practice of it in <Bungaku-Annai> magazine. By the way, <One day in the East> as the group works was practiced in response to <One day in the world> which Gorky proposed it. 　First of all, in relation to genre of Reportage those essays is rare at Japan and Korea. Therefore, I will examine Reportage in Chinese literature for reference. Because in the Chinese literature the Reportage is systematized and reaches it at the present. The following part, I’m going to examine the literary argument of Reportage on <Bungaku Annai> magazine, and make clear difference with it of Chinese literature. And lastly, I will analyze <One day in the East> as the group works . <One day in the East> was written just after The February 26 Incident(on February 26, 1936). Therefore, <One day in the East> was described with this incident in the view points of workers who directly witnessed it. And I will reevaluate their analysis of those days. In analyzing the view of The Showa 10s which was described in <One day in the East>, I think that we can have a glimpse of The Showa 10s Japan.