다니자키 준이치로문학과 이상문학 비교연구1
A Comparative Study 1 on Tanizaki Junichiro Literature and Lee Sang Literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper compared and reviewed Tanizaki Junichiro literature and Lee Sang literature with a focus on three topics of ‘complex’, ‘succubism’, and ‘longing for modernization’. As esthetic writer and surreal psychological writer, writer from the ruling country and writer from the ruled country, writer who lived long while earning favorable reviews by the literary world and writer who died young while being despised by the public, two writers are seen as writers from the remote worlds not to be compared with each other at first glance. However, the above three patterns shown in the works of two writers can be said to be the commonalities of their literature. First, ‘complex’ resulted from the appearance inferiority in the case of Tanizaki and was caused by gynophobia in childhood in the case of Lee Sang. Second, ‘succubism’ was associated with two writers’ common experience of maternity love of in childhood, that is, an Oedipus complex. And finally, in the case of ‘longing for modernization’, it was found that an Edo native Tanizaki and Lee Sang reflected the desire for modernization in their works in westernized Tokyo at that time and Gyeongseong in 1930s being capitalized during the Japanese colonial period, respectively.
Abstract
This paper compared and reviewed Tanizaki Junichiro literature and Lee Sang literature with a focus on three topics of ‘complex’, ‘succubism’, and ‘longing for modernization’. As esthetic writer and surreal psychological writer, writer from the ruling country and writer from the ruled country, writer who lived long while earning favorable reviews by the literary world and writer who died young while being despised by the public, two writers are seen as writers from the remote worlds not to be compared with each other at first glance. However, the above three patterns shown in the works of two writers can be said to be the commonalities of their literature. First, ‘complex’ resulted from the appearance inferiority in the case of Tanizaki and was caused by gynophobia in childhood in the case of Lee Sang. Second, ‘succubism’ was associated with two writers’ common experience of maternity love of in childhood, that is, an Oedipus complex. And finally, in the case of ‘longing for modernization’, it was found that an Edo native Tanizaki and Lee Sang reflected the desire for modernization in their works in westernized Tokyo at that time and Gyeongseong in 1930s being capitalized during the Japanese colonial period, respectively.
참고문헌 (27)
- "谷崎潤一郎全集 第10巻", pp.102~, 中央公論社
- "谷崎潤一郎全集․第三卷", pp.7~8, 中央公論新社
- 이희승, "국어대사전", pp.3917~ (2004), 민중서림
- C. G. 융, "C. G. 융 심리학 해설", pp.94~ (2014), 선영사
- C. G. Jung, "상징과 리비도", pp.30~ (2005), 솔
- 구사노 다쿠미, "환상동물사전", pp.157~262 (2001), 들녘
- 河野多恵子, "小説の秘密をめぐる十二章", pp.182~183 (2002), 文春文庫
- 河野多恵子, "谷崎文学の愉しみ", pp.12~ (1993), 中央公論社
- 橋本稔, "谷崎潤一郎", pp.8~ (1974), 八木書店
- 沼正三, "ある夢想家の手帳から5", pp.119~ (1976), 潮出版社
- 川村湊, "ソウル都市物語", pp.82~83 (2000), 平凡社新書
- 김춘미, "다니자키 즁이치로", pp.45~46 (1996), 건국대학교 출판부
- 김학이, "성(性) 만드는 사람들－마그누스 히르쉬펠트와 베를린 성과학 연구소, 1896~1933－", 서양사론, (103), pp.153~195 (2009), 한국서양사학회
- 沼正三, "ある夢想家の手帳から5", pp.120~139 (1976), 潮出版社
- 細江光, "谷崎潤一郎․深層のレットリック", pp.78~ (2004), 和泉書院
- 이부영, "분석심리학 이야기", pp.39~ (2014), 집문당
- 이부영, "아니마와 아니무스", pp.32~33 (2001), 한길사
- 河野多恵子, "谷崎文学の愉しみ", pp.74~75 (1993), 中央公論社
- 藤村猛, "｢羅生門｣試論(上)-谷崎潤一郎｢刺青｣に注目して-", 近代文学試論, (32), pp.23~ (1994), 広島大学近代文学研究会
- 김윤식, "李箱문학전집2․소설", pp.23~ (2002), 문학사상사
- 김윤식, "李箱硏究", pp.110~ (2002), 문학사상사
- 임영태, "오감도․권태", pp.6~ (2014), 애플북스
- 구사노 다쿠미, "환상동물사전", pp.157~262 (2001), 들녘
- 강심호, "일제식민지 치하 경성부민의 도시적 감수성 형성과정 연구- 1930년대 한국소설에 나타난 도시적 소비문화의 성립을 중심으로", 서울학연구, (21), pp.101~148 (2003), 서울학연구소
- 정노천, "이상 문학에 나타난 성 연구", 석사, 문예창작, pp.1999
- 박철석, "이상문학에 나타난 콤플렉스", 한국문학논총, 16, pp.151~ (1995), 한국문학회
- 서준섭, "(민중생활 100년사)자본주의의 화려한 옷으로 변신한 1930년대 경성거리", 역사비평, 15, pp.95~ (1991), 역사비평사