본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이상과 목시영의 근대인식 비교연구

A comparative study on modern recognition of Lee Sang and Mu Shiying

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Lee Sang and Mu Shiying were very active writers who worked on writing in Korea and China in 1930's. Seoul and Shanghai in 1930's where Lee Sang and Mu Shiying worked were epitomes of modern times created by imperialistic capitalism. Their criticism on colonialism in their works is often replaced with criticism on capitalism. This article aims to comparatively study their modern recognition and their perspective on ‘modern times’ by analyzing their major works. For Lee Sang and Mu Shiying, modern cities are the objects of curiosities and those of anxiety and fear at the same time. Lee Sang distances himself from those modern cities and grasps the logic of capitalism from the perspective of an observer. For Mu Shiying, Shanghai where the tradition and the modern times are mingled is a deformed city. Lee Sang and Mu Shiying express their senses of anxiety about the modern consumption pattern. The main character of Lee Sang's novel shows his aversion to modern times by expressing his fear for fetism of capitalism that continuously arouses our desires for material things in the monetary order. On the contrary, Mu Shiying obsesses about modern ‘time’ through modern consumption and acutely feels the fatigue and sense of impotence coming after such experience. At the same time, those two writers focus on the human relations of modern times through metafictional writing. While Lee Sang expressed the collapse of faith in humans relations, Mu Shiying expressed severance of communication in the human relations of modern times. Basically, while Lee Sang's perspective is ‘looking down’ from above and ‘looking in’ from outside by grasping the fictitious lives of colonialistic modern times, that of Mu Shiying is ‘exposing’ from inside to outside through a variety of direct experiences in the modern cities.

Abstract

Lee Sang and Mu Shiying were very active writers who worked on writing in Korea and China in 1930's. Seoul and Shanghai in 1930's where Lee Sang and Mu Shiying worked were epitomes of modern times created by imperialistic capitalism. Their criticism on colonialism in their works is often replaced with criticism on capitalism. This article aims to comparatively study their modern recognition and their perspective on ‘modern times’ by analyzing their major works. For Lee Sang and Mu Shiying, modern cities are the objects of curiosities and those of anxiety and fear at the same time. Lee Sang distances himself from those modern cities and grasps the logic of capitalism from the perspective of an observer. For Mu Shiying, Shanghai where the tradition and the modern times are mingled is a deformed city. Lee Sang and Mu Shiying express their senses of anxiety about the modern consumption pattern. The main character of Lee Sang's novel shows his aversion to modern times by expressing his fear for fetism of capitalism that continuously arouses our desires for material things in the monetary order. On the contrary, Mu Shiying obsesses about modern ‘time’ through modern consumption and acutely feels the fatigue and sense of impotence coming after such experience. At the same time, those two writers focus on the human relations of modern times through metafictional writing. While Lee Sang expressed the collapse of faith in humans relations, Mu Shiying expressed severance of communication in the human relations of modern times. Basically, while Lee Sang's perspective is ‘looking down’ from above and ‘looking in’ from outside by grasping the fictitious lives of colonialistic modern times, that of Mu Shiying is ‘exposing’ from inside to outside through a variety of direct experiences in the modern cities.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 고부응, "탈식민주의 - 이론과 쟁점", pp.223~255, 문학과지성사
  2. 권영민, "이상 전집2", pp.258~336 (2009), 뿔
  3. 권영민, "이상 문학 연구 60년", pp.01~408 (1998), 문학사상사
  4. 권영민, "이상텍스트연구", pp.01~453 (2009), 문학에디션 뿔
  5. 김기림, "우리 신문학과 근대의식, In 김기림 전집2", pp.48~ (1988), 심설당
  6. 김성기, "세기말의 모더니티, In 모더니티란 무엇인가", pp.21~ (1994), 민음사
  7. 나병철, "소설의 이해", pp.362~ (1993), 문예출판사
  8. 노정은, "무스잉 소설의 근대경험 양상 고찰", 중국학연구, (33), pp.111~138 (2005), 중국학연구회
  9. 류보선, "한국 근대문학의 정치적 (무)의식", pp.216~ (2005), 소명출판
  10. 김종석, "상하이 모던", pp.346~377 (2007), 고려대학교출판부
  11. 송민호, "李箱 문학에 나타난 ‘화폐’와 글쓰기", 韓國學報, 28, pp.134~135 (2002)
  12. 이재복, "이상 소설에 나타난 산책의 의미와 근대성에 관한 연구- 몸의 문제를 중심으로 -", 우리말글, 29, pp.399~428 (2003), 우리말글학회
  13. 전성욱, "근대에 대한 지향과 지양으로서의 李箱 소설", 동남어문논집, 20, pp.167~ (2005)
  14. 穆時英, "목시영전집1-3" (2008), 北京十月文藝出版社
  15. 吳義勤, "穆時英: 劃出兩條軌迹的流星", 貴州社會科學, (5), pp.69~74 (1993)
  16. 嚴家炎, "中國現代小說流派史(增訂本", pp.124~169 (2009), 長江文藝出版社
  17. 張英進, "中國現代文學과 영화 속의 도시", pp.166~176 (2007), 江蘇人民出版社
  18. 장 보드리야르, "소비의 사회", pp.01~349 (1999), 문예출판사
  19. M. 칼리니스쿠, "모더니티의 다섯 얼굴", pp.53~54 (1994), 시각과 언어
  20. 퍼트리샤 워, "메타픽션", pp.15~19 (1999), 열음사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)