덕 윤리와 유덕한 행위자 모델
Models about the Virtuous Person and Virtue Ethics
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Virtue ethics has solved the disadvantages which come from Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics and so is esteemed as a rival ethical theory to normative ethics. It is much criticized by Utilitarian and Kantian ethics. Those who adhere to virtue ethics should be able to answer to the criticisms presented by utilitarian and Kantian ethics. In this paper, I present an explanation on the relation of the virtuous agent to right action, because this explanation allows room to understand how one may be a virtuous person and what are the things that a virtuous person does, this being one of the criticisms thrown towards virtue ethics. I first broadly examine the priority of aretaic evaluation in character trait over normative evaluation in action, because the relation between the virtuous agent and right action can be explained by different views in the priority of aretaic evaluation. I also consider the technical manual model, role model, and developmental model and suggest that the developmental model is the most appropriate as a proper model of being a virtuous agent in virtue ethics. While having argument about a formula about right action in virtue ethics’ and a condition “agent knows” on an act’s being done in Nicomachean Ethics.
Abstract
Virtue ethics has solved the disadvantages which come from Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics and so is esteemed as a rival ethical theory to normative ethics. It is much criticized by Utilitarian and Kantian ethics. Those who adhere to virtue ethics should be able to answer to the criticisms presented by utilitarian and Kantian ethics. In this paper, I present an explanation on the relation of the virtuous agent to right action, because this explanation allows room to understand how one may be a virtuous person and what are the things that a virtuous person does, this being one of the criticisms thrown towards virtue ethics. I first broadly examine the priority of aretaic evaluation in character trait over normative evaluation in action, because the relation between the virtuous agent and right action can be explained by different views in the priority of aretaic evaluation. I also consider the technical manual model, role model, and developmental model and suggest that the developmental model is the most appropriate as a proper model of being a virtuous agent in virtue ethics. While having argument about a formula about right action in virtue ethics’ and a condition “agent knows” on an act’s being done in Nicomachean Ethics.
참고문헌 (19)
- 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학"
- 요한 볼프강 폰 괴테, "‘천상의 서곡’ 파우스트1" (2012), 민음사
- Alasdair MacIntyre, "After Virtue, Notre Dame" (1984), University Of Notre Dame Press
- Elizabeth Anscombe, "Modern Moral Philosophy", Philosophy, 3, pp.3~ (1958)
- Barbara Herman, "The Practice of Moral Judgment" (1993), Harvard University Press
- Janson H. W., "History of art for young people" (2003), Prentice Hall
- Julia Annas, "Being Virtuous and Doing the Right Thing", Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 78(2) (2004)
- McClellan J., "Philosophy of Education" (1976), Prentice-Hall
- Michael Slote, "From Morality To Virtue" (1992), Oxford University Press
- Michael Stocker, "The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories, In The Virtues: Contemporary Essays on Moral Character" (1987), Wadsworth Publishing Company
- Kurt Baier, "‘Radical Virtue Ethics", Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13 (1998)
- Pelaez, M., "The learning of moral behavior; A behavior-analytic approach, In Moral Development: An introduction" (1995), Allyn and Bacon
- Peter Railton, "Alienation, Consequentialism and demands of Morality, In Consequentialism and its Critics" (1988), Oxford University Press
- Phillippa Foot, "Euthanasia, In Virtue and Vices" (1991), University of California Press
- R. M. Hare, "Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point" (1981), Oxford Univerity Press
- Robert B. Louden, "On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics", American Philosophical Quarterly, 21 (1984)
- Rosalind Hursthouse, "Virtue Theory and Abortion", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2 (1991)
- Stern D., "The First Relationship : Infant and mother", pp.1977, Fontana
- William Frankena, "Prichard and the ethics of virtue", The Monist, 54 (1970)