빅 데이터(Big Data) 시대 개정 개인정보 보호법에 관한 법적 고찰
Legal Considerations on the Personal Information Protection Act Revised in the Age of Big Data
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With the revision of the Personal Information Protection Act, the concept of ‘pseudonymized information’, which cannot identify a specific individual without using or combining additional information, was newly established, and it was possible to process pseudonym information without the consent of the data subject. It is meaningful that a legal basis for contributing to the development of the ICT industry was prepared by using such pseudonymized information. The revised Personal Information Protection Act does not apply to information that can no longer be recognized by an individual, ie, ‘anonymous information’ when other information is used when reasonably considering time, cost, and technology. However, the distinction between pseudonymized information and anonymous information is not a definitive concept, but a tentative concept that can be changed depending on the level of technology available at the time of information processing. In the Personal Information Protection Act, ‘scientific research’ is defined as “research that applies scientific methods such as technology development and demonstration, basic research, applied research, and private investment research.” The scope of use of ‘scientific research’ in personal information is unclear. It should be considered that the statistical preparation, scientific research, and preservation of public records recorded in the Personal Information Protection Act are limited to public works or activities for the public good. Between the Personal Information Protection Act and the Credit Information Use and Protection Act, it is limited to writing statistics, scientific research, and preserving records in the public interest to the extent that it can process pseudonymized information without the consent of the data subject or statistics for commercial purposes. There is a difference whether writing and industrial research are also included. The Personal Information Protection Act stipulates that, in relation to relationship with other Acts, “The protection of personal information shall be governed by this Act, except as otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts.” Between the ‘Personal Information Protection Act’ and ‘Bioethics and Safety Act’, ‘Medical Service Act’, and ‘Act on the Protection, Use, etc. of Location Information, there is a question as to which law should be applied first with regard to the application of pseudonymized information processing.
Abstract
With the revision of the Personal Information Protection Act, the concept of ‘pseudonymized information’, which cannot identify a specific individual without using or combining additional information, was newly established, and it was possible to process pseudonym information without the consent of the data subject. It is meaningful that a legal basis for contributing to the development of the ICT industry was prepared by using such pseudonymized information. The revised Personal Information Protection Act does not apply to information that can no longer be recognized by an individual, ie, ‘anonymous information’ when other information is used when reasonably considering time, cost, and technology. However, the distinction between pseudonymized information and anonymous information is not a definitive concept, but a tentative concept that can be changed depending on the level of technology available at the time of information processing. In the Personal Information Protection Act, ‘scientific research’ is defined as “research that applies scientific methods such as technology development and demonstration, basic research, applied research, and private investment research.” The scope of use of ‘scientific research’ in personal information is unclear. It should be considered that the statistical preparation, scientific research, and preservation of public records recorded in the Personal Information Protection Act are limited to public works or activities for the public good. Between the Personal Information Protection Act and the Credit Information Use and Protection Act, it is limited to writing statistics, scientific research, and preserving records in the public interest to the extent that it can process pseudonymized information without the consent of the data subject or statistics for commercial purposes. There is a difference whether writing and industrial research are also included. The Personal Information Protection Act stipulates that, in relation to relationship with other Acts, “The protection of personal information shall be governed by this Act, except as otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts.” Between the ‘Personal Information Protection Act’ and ‘Bioethics and Safety Act’, ‘Medical Service Act’, and ‘Act on the Protection, Use, etc. of Location Information, there is a question as to which law should be applied first with regard to the application of pseudonymized information processing.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김일환, "가명정보의 개념과 처리조건에 대한 입법론적 고찰", 토지공법연구, 87, pp.729~761 (2019), 한국토지공법학회
- 김중길, "빅데이터(Big Data)와 정보인권에 관한 최근 독일의 논의와 시사 - 개인정보보호를 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 21(2), pp.225~255 (2014), 법학연구원
- 김지영, "개인정보보호를 위한 사물인터넷의 법적 규율에 관한 고찰", 법과정책연구, 15(4), pp.1451~1482 (2015), 한국법정책학회[DOI]
- 김판기, "개인정보자기결정권과 공개된 개인정보의영리목적 활용", 법과정책연구, 19(1), pp.171~194 (2019), 한국법정책학회[DOI]
- 김해원, "개인정보에 대한 헌법적 검토 - 「개인정보보호법」의 목적 및 정의 규정을 중심으로 -", 공법학연구, 20(4), pp.63~98 (2019), 한국비교공법학회
- 백승엽, "개인신용정보 비식별 조치의 내용과 한계에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, 29(4), pp.63~102 (2017), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 양기진, "GDPR의 관점상 신용정보법 개정안(김병욱 의원 대표발의안)의 검토 - 가명조치·익명조치 개념, 정보주체의 동의범주 이슈를 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 38(2), pp.249~276 (2019), 한국상사법학회[DOI]
- 양천수, "제4차 산업혁명과 법" (2017), 박영사
- 윤석진, "개인정보 보호와 빅데이터 활용의 충돌, 그 문제와 입법정책 과제 -보건의료 빅데이터를 중심으로-", 중앙법학, 17(1), pp.7~47 (2015), 중앙법학회[DOI]
- 이부하, "알고리즘(Algorithm)에 대한 법적 문제와 법적 규율", 과학기술과 법, 9(2), pp.211~230 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 전승재, "개인정보, 가명정보, 익명정보에 관한4개국 법제 비교분석", 정보법학, 22(3), pp.183~218 (2018), 한국정보법학회
- 정준현, "사물인터넷 환경과 개인정보보호의 법적 문제", 일감법학, (42), pp.255~286 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 정준현, "개인정보의 수집·처리·제3자 제공과 가치창출에 관한 법적 문제연구", 홍익법학, 16(1), pp.937~960 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 차상육, "세이프하버협정 무효판결 이후 EU 일반개인정보보호규정(GDPR)의 내용과 우리 개인정보보호법제상 시사점- 개인정보의 국외이전에 관한 비교법적 연구를 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 36(1), pp.211~249 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 최민아, "아날로그-디지털 인터랙션 흔적을 활용한 뉴미디어 공간 디자인", Journal of Integrated Design Research, 10(1), pp.107~117 (2011), 디자인연구소[DOI]
- 최우정, "EU에서의 정보보호와 관련한 판례의 동향 -구글과 관련된 판례를 중심으로-", 중앙법학, 17(2), pp.83~110 (2015), 중앙법학회[DOI]
