신경미학과 미술사의 접점들에 대하여: J. 오니언스의 ‘신경미술사’ 개념과 칸트의 연역을 중심으로
On the Intersections of Neuroesthetics and Art History - Through Onians’s “Neuroarthistory” and the Kantian Notion of Deduction
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본고의 목적은 신경미학과 미술사학이 공진화해 온 과정과 두 분야의 가능한 접점들을 명료화하고 그것들이 공유하는 목적을 도출하는 것이다. 먼저 서두에서 두 분야의 접점으로서 제시되는 존 오니언스의 “신경미술사”(neuroarthistory) 개념을 살펴보고근본 쟁점들을 짚어 보고자 한다. 신경미술사는 미학과 미술사학과 마찬가지로 판단 또는 비평의 당위성 문제와 예술적 의도에 대한 인식적 접근을 피할 수 없으므로, 신경과학이 여기에 도움을 줄 수 있는가를 비판적으로 검토하는 일은 필수적이다. 필자는 신경과학이 근현대 미학과 미술사 방법론의 필수적 공통분모인 칸트식 연역을 심화시켜 줄수는 있으나 대체하지는 못한다고 보고 있다. 이상을 통해 필자는 신경미술사의 필요성과 타당성을 따져 보고, 그로써 신경미학과 미술사학의 공통 과제가 미적 체험의 본성에대한 실증적 연구, 그리고 예술적 의도에 대한 경우탐구적, 발견법적 연구임을 드러내보이고자 한다.
Abstract
This article attempts to clarify the coevolutive development and the intersections of neuroesthetics and art history and to draw a common object of investigation. It will first summarize Onians’s idea of “neuroarthistory” introduced as a possible intersection and explain its main problems. Since neuroarthistory, as is the case for aesthetics and art history, cannot bypass epistemological approach towards the imperativeness in aesthetic judgment or criticism and artistic intention, asking whether neuroscience can help deal with such problems and approach becomes paramount. It will then be argued that neuroscience, while it can deepen the common methodology of Kantian deduction fundamental to both aesthetics and art history from their very modern outset, cannot nevertheless replace it. I will then critically reflect on the adequacy of neuroarthistory, and show that the overarching task concerning neuroesthetics and art history is an empirical investigation into the nature of aesthetic experience and casuistic-heuristic studies on artistic intentions.
참고문헌 (36)
- 리글, 알로이스, "조형예술의 역사적 문법" (2020), 갈무리
- 설, 존, "신경생물학과 인간의 자유: 자유의지, 언어, 그리고 정치권력에 관한 고찰" (2010), 궁리
- 칸트, 임마누엘, "순수이성비판" (2020), 아카넷
- 칸트, 임마누엘, "판단력비판" (2020), 아카넷
- 파노프스키, 에르빈, "시각예술의 의미" (2013), 한길사
- Baxandall, Michael, "The Language of Art History", New Literary History, 10(3), pp.453~465 (1979)
- Burckhardt, Jacob, "Force and Freedom: Reflections on History" (1943), Pantheon
- Changeux, Jean-Pierre, "La beauté dans le cerveau" (2016), Odile Jacob
- Chatterjee, Anjan, "Neuroaesthetics : A Coming of Age Story", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience(MIT), 23(1), pp.53~62 (2010)
- Cheetham, Mark, "The Subjects of Art History: Historical Objects in Contemporary Perspectives" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Chignell, Andrew, "The Problem of Particularity in Kant’s Aesthetic Theory", The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (1998)
- Di Dio, Cinzia., "Neuroaesthetics : A Review", Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 19, pp.682~687 (2009)
- Didi-Huberman, Georges, "Brouillards de peines et de désirs" (2023), Minuit
- Didi-Huberman, Georges, "L’Image survivante : Histoire de l’art et temps des fantômes selon Aby Warburg" (2002), Minuit
- Didi-Huberman, Georges, "Devant le temps, Histoire de l’art et anachronisme des images" (2000), Minuit
- Elkins, James, "Art History without Theory", Critical Inquiry, 14(2), pp.354~378 (1988)
- Freedberg, David, "Motion, Emotion, and Empathy in Esthetic Experience", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), pp.197~203 (2007)
- Fried, Michael, "No Problem", Representations, 135, pp.140~149 (2016)
- Genette, Gérard, "L’oeuvre de l’art" (2010), Seuil
- Guyer, Paul, "Kant and the Experience of Freedom" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Holly, Michael A., "Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History" (1984), Cornell University Press
- Holt, Jason, "Neuroaesthetics and Philosophy", pp.1~7 (2013), SAGE
- Jimenez, Marc, "Art et technosciences. Bioart-Neuroesthétique, 50 questions" (2016), Klincksieck
- Kawabata, Hideaki, "Neural Correlates of Bbeauty", Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(4), pp.1699~1705 (2004)
- Onians, John, "European Art: A Neuroarthistory" (2016), Yale University Press
- Onians, John, "Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki" (2007), Yale University Press
- Panofsky, Erwin, "Perspective as Symbolic Form" (1991), Zone Books
- Riegl, Aloïs, "Stilfragen. Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik" (1893), Verlag von Georg Siemens
- Schaeffer, Jean-Marie, "L’Expérience esthétique" (2015), Gallimard
- Stolnitz, Jerome, "Aesthetics: The Big Questions" (1998), Blackwell
- Sturm, Thomas, "Kant and the Scientific Study of Consciousness", History of the Human Sciences, 23(3), pp.48~71 (2010)
- Tallis, Raymond, "The Limitations of a Neurological Approach to Aart", The Lancet, Perspective, 372(9632), pp.19~20 (2008)
- Tanaka, Masatoshi, "Noradrenaline Systems in the Hypothalamus, Amygdala and Locus Coeruleus Are Involved in the Provocation of Anxiety: Basic Studies", European Journal of Pharmacology, 405(1-3), pp.397~406 (2000)
- Wölfflin, Heinrich, "Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art" (1950), Dover
- Zaidel, Dahlia W., "Art and Brain : Insights from Neuropsychology, Biology and Evoluion", Journal of Anatomy, 216(2), pp.177~183 (2010)
- Zeki, Semir, "Inner Vision : An Exploration of Art and the Brain" (1999), Oxford University Press