‘조선시대의 가장권’에 대한 지식의 착종: 식민주의의 지적 유산에 대한 비판적 논의
Entangled Knowledge about ‘Patriarchal Power of Chosǒn Period’ : Critical Review on the Legacy of Colonialism
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Entangled Knowledge about ‘Patriarchal Power of Chosǒn Period’ : Critical Review on the Legacy of Colonialism Jung, Ji Young The patriarchal power of family head has been considered as one of the quintessential aspect of pre-modern Chosŏn society in modern Korea. Critical to my argument is a deeper understanding of the ways in which colonial/postcolonial knowledge constitute specific idea about patriarchal power of Chosŏn period. While Korean contemporary scholars have criticized the colonial view of history, their anti-colonial theories used the similar basis of the colonial knowledge on the patriarchy in Chosŏn period. Ironically, the more they attempted to counter the colonial view on the Korea’s history, the more they ended up reinforcing the frame of the knowledge. The postcolonial knowledge was shaped by the intersection of adhesion and antipathy to colonial artifact. So far, the ‘family head’ in Chosǒn has been regarded as the representative of a clan with strong patriarchal authority according rather to the customary than legal code. This study mainly analyzes the existing academic discussions on the power of “family head” in Chosǒn. Then, it attempts to clarify how the state of Chosǒn defined the right and responsibility of the family head/household head by examining Chosǒn's law books, administrational guidelines, and household register. This study aims to de-construct the framework in which the Chosǒn period has been understood by the modern Korean society after the colonial period.
Abstract
Entangled Knowledge about ‘Patriarchal Power of Chosǒn Period’ : Critical Review on the Legacy of Colonialism Jung, Ji Young The patriarchal power of family head has been considered as one of the quintessential aspect of pre-modern Chosŏn society in modern Korea. Critical to my argument is a deeper understanding of the ways in which colonial/postcolonial knowledge constitute specific idea about patriarchal power of Chosŏn period. While Korean contemporary scholars have criticized the colonial view of history, their anti-colonial theories used the similar basis of the colonial knowledge on the patriarchy in Chosŏn period. Ironically, the more they attempted to counter the colonial view on the Korea’s history, the more they ended up reinforcing the frame of the knowledge. The postcolonial knowledge was shaped by the intersection of adhesion and antipathy to colonial artifact. So far, the ‘family head’ in Chosǒn has been regarded as the representative of a clan with strong patriarchal authority according rather to the customary than legal code. This study mainly analyzes the existing academic discussions on the power of “family head” in Chosǒn. Then, it attempts to clarify how the state of Chosǒn defined the right and responsibility of the family head/household head by examining Chosǒn's law books, administrational guidelines, and household register. This study aims to de-construct the framework in which the Chosǒn period has been understood by the modern Korean society after the colonial period.
참고문헌 (26)
- "경상도단성현호적대장", ~
- "대명률직해", ~
- "대전회통", ~
- "비변사등록", ~
- "조선왕조실록", ~
- 김두헌, "韓國家族制度硏究", pp.322~330 (1969), 서울大學敎出版部
- 문숙자, "근세 한국과 일본의 가족 비교: 영속성(永續性)의 실현이라는 관점에서", 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities, 6(2), pp.83~113 (2013), 이화인문과학원
- 박병호, "韓國의 傳統家族과 家長權", 韓國學報, 2(1), pp.67~93 (1976), 일지사
- 박병호, "韓國의 傳統社會와 法", pp.109~113 (1985), 서울대출판부
- 박병호, "韓國家父長權法制의 史的 考察", 한국여성학, 2, pp.50~94 (1986), 한국여성학회
- 박병호, "일제하의 가족정책과 관습법 형성과정", 서울대학교 法學, 33(2), pp.1~17 (1992), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 양현아, "한국 가족법 읽기: 전통, 식민지성, 젠더의 교차로에서", pp.142~167 (2011), 창비
- 이경하, "18세기 여성생활사자료집 2", pp.30~31 (2010), 보고사
- 이승일, "조선총독부 법제 정책" (2008), 역사비평사
- 이정선, "한국 근대 '호적제도(戶籍制度)'의 변천: '민적법(民籍法)'의 법제적 특징을 중심으로", 韓國史論, 55, pp.275~328 (2009), 서울大學校 人文大學 國史學科
- 이정선, "식민지 조선·대만에서의 ‘家制度’의 정착 과정 - ‘戶主·家族’과 ‘戶主相續’ 개념을 중심으로 -", 한국문화, (55), pp.253~283 (2011), 규장각한국학연구원
- 國譯 慣習調査報告書, "정긍식", 한국법제연구원, ~ (1992)
- 정지영, "조선시대 ‘가장’의 지위와 책임: 법전의 규정을 중심으로", 가족과 문화, 25(1), pp.121~149 (2013), 한국가족학회
- 정지영, "조선시대 가장(家長) 지위의 구축과정과 국가-<조선왕조실록>의 가장 관련 기사를 중심으로-", 한국고전여성문학연구, (26), pp.125~159 (2013), 한국고전여성문학회
- 정지영, "질서의 구축과 균열: 조선후기 호적과 여성들", pp.193~214 (2015), 서강대출판부
- 최병주, "民事令第11條の慣習と宗孫權及遺妻の相續權(2)", 司法協會雜誌, 17(3), pp.35~36 (1938), 法曹協會
- 홍양희, "식민지 사법관료의 가족 ‘관습’ 인식과 젠더 질서 -『관습조사보고서』의 호주권에 대한 인식을 중심으로-", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (79), pp.161~195 (2008), 한국사회사학회
- 홍양희, "植民地時期 戶籍制度와 家族制度의 變容", 사학연구, (79), pp.167~205 (2005), 한국사학회
- 安田幹太, "朝鮮における家族制度の變遷", 朝鮮, (296), pp.8~9 (1940)
- 野村調太郞, "祖上の祭祀と現行の法律", 司法協會雜誌, 5(4), pp.86~ (1926), 法曹協會
- Seong-Hak Kim, "Law and Custom under the Chosŏn Dynasty and Colonial Korea: A Comparative Perspective", The Journal of Asian Studies, 66(4), pp.1067~1097 (2007), The Association for Asian Studies