본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

김동인의 번역소설 「마지막 오후」의 번역상 특징

On the Stylistic Characteristics of Kim Dongin’s Translated Novel Last Afternoon

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper intends to identify the stylistic characteristics of translation in Kim Dongin’s translated novel Last Afternoon. First of all, one feature of his translation is his use of various punctuation marks. The translator made much use of such marks as commas, parentheses, ellipses, equal signs, lines and emphatic dots, which were not found in Mori Ogai’s Japanese version. Second, he expressed foreign words with a variety of ways: Chinese characters as in ‘英國’, English alphabets as in ‘Adonis’, Korean alphabets as in ‘키쓰’ or emphatic dots as in ‘타트라’ . It is somewhat true that some of these ways can be traced back to Japanese influence. Still, it is also true that his use of these methods was very subjective. In his translation, he did not simply put Japanese version into a corresponding Korean version. For example, he combined two sentences into one sentence one some occasions. He also utilized other ways such as inverting a sentence, using an ellipsis, or making a simple sentence a longer one. Also, it can be easily seen that he tried to search for proper words and expressions for his translation. The contrast between ‘uncommon handsome man’ and ‘uncommon ugly man’, and a set of 6 different Korean words for ‘goteishu(御亭主)’ would exemplify his efforts to come up with adequate words in his translation. The novel titled Last Afternoon was adapted to the novel titled Picture and Letter in 1934. It is interesting that the title of the adapted novel was Picture and Letter. In fact, a picture and a letter were used in the novel Last Afternoon as the cricial tools that changed the relationship between the man and the woman. This also had an impact on the novel Woman published in 1930. That is, a letter in the novel Woman played an important role for the hero to break up with Ms. Kim Okyep.

Abstract

This paper intends to identify the stylistic characteristics of translation in Kim Dongin’s translated novel Last Afternoon. First of all, one feature of his translation is his use of various punctuation marks. The translator made much use of such marks as commas, parentheses, ellipses, equal signs, lines and emphatic dots, which were not found in Mori Ogai’s Japanese version. Second, he expressed foreign words with a variety of ways: Chinese characters as in ‘英國’, English alphabets as in ‘Adonis’, Korean alphabets as in ‘키쓰’ or emphatic dots as in ‘타트라’ . It is somewhat true that some of these ways can be traced back to Japanese influence. Still, it is also true that his use of these methods was very subjective. In his translation, he did not simply put Japanese version into a corresponding Korean version. For example, he combined two sentences into one sentence one some occasions. He also utilized other ways such as inverting a sentence, using an ellipsis, or making a simple sentence a longer one. Also, it can be easily seen that he tried to search for proper words and expressions for his translation. The contrast between ‘uncommon handsome man’ and ‘uncommon ugly man’, and a set of 6 different Korean words for ‘goteishu(御亭主)’ would exemplify his efforts to come up with adequate words in his translation. The novel titled Last Afternoon was adapted to the novel titled Picture and Letter in 1934. It is interesting that the title of the adapted novel was Picture and Letter. In fact, a picture and a letter were used in the novel Last Afternoon as the cricial tools that changed the relationship between the man and the woman. This also had an impact on the novel Woman published in 1930. That is, a letter in the novel Woman played an important role for the hero to break up with Ms. Kim Okyep.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 国立国会図書館, "明治․大正․昭和翻訳文学目録", pp.626~639 (1959), 風間書房
  2. 김동인, "마즈막午後", 영대, (3) (1924), 영대사
  3. 김동인, "金東仁評論全集", pp.434~435 (1984), 삼영사
  4. 김병철, "한국근대번역문학사연구", pp.960~ (1975), 을유문화사
  5. 김윤식, "김동인연구", pp.57~525 (2000), 민음사
  6. 민현식, "국어정서법연구", pp.243~256 (1999), 태학사
  7. 小堀桂一郎, "森鴎外文業解題 翻訳編", pp.101~522 (1982), 岩波書店
  8. 森鴎外, "鴎外全集 第11巻" (1972), 岩波書店
  9. 이승후, "국어 문장부호 연구: 현행 규정과 세칙안 검토를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2003
  10. 정응수, "森鴎外の『諸国物語』と金東仁の翻訳小説について-モルナールの「辻馬車」を中心に", 比較文化硏究, (87), pp.99~109 (2009), 日本比較文化學會
  11. 정응수, "김동인의 번역·번안 작품 연구 서설", 일본문화연구, (36), pp.417~432 (2010), 동아시아일본학회[DOI]
  12. 한경민, "몰나르 페렌츠의 『팔 거리의 아이들』 분석 -성장소설로서의 의미-", 동유럽발칸연구, 15, pp.175~201 (2005), 동유럽발칸연구소
  13. "耽美主義作家としての金東仁"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)