본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A reconsideration of the (non-)uniform syntax of Korean right-dislocation

Kaori Furuya
한국현대언어학회 (The Modern Linguistic Society Of Korea)|2018.06|언어연구 (Linguistic Research)|제35권 제2호|pp. 275-304|DOI 10.17250/khisli.35.2.201806.002

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

right-dislocationfragmentsempty categorybi-clausal analysismono-clausal analysiscleft construction
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper investigates the clausal natureof Korean Right-Dislocation Constructions (RDCs) and reconsiders recent extant (non-)uniform analyses of RDCs. Since Korean is a pro-drop language, most of the literature on Korean RDCs assumes the preverbal empty category as pro or a trace out of movement in the constructions. However, recent literature has shown that null arguments can also be derived via argument ellipsis (e.g. Sakamoto 2016). The paper identifies the categorial statuses of preverbal empty categories and demonstrates similarities and differences between gapped and gapless RDCs that Ko (2016) and Ahn and Cho (2016, 2017) do not observe. It argues that a non-uniform analysis is most compatible to account for the distribution of empty categories of RDCs. The proposed analysis receives support form novel evidence based on (non-)parallelisms between RDCs and fragment answers.

Abstract

This paper investigates the clausal natureof Korean Right-Dislocation Constructions (RDCs) and reconsiders recent extant (non-)uniform analyses of RDCs. Since Korean is a pro-drop language, most of the literature on Korean RDCs assumes the preverbal empty category as pro or a trace out of movement in the constructions. However, recent literature has shown that null arguments can also be derived via argument ellipsis (e.g. Sakamoto 2016). The paper identifies the categorial statuses of preverbal empty categories and demonstrates similarities and differences between gapped and gapless RDCs that Ko (2016) and Ahn and Cho (2016, 2017) do not observe. It argues that a non-uniform analysis is most compatible to account for the distribution of empty categories of RDCs. The proposed analysis receives support form novel evidence based on (non-)parallelisms between RDCs and fragment answers.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 안희돈, "A Uniform Analysis of Right Dislocation: A Reply to Ko (2016)", 어학연구, 52(2), pp.213~245 (2016), 언어교육원
  2. 안희돈, "A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.311~359 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  3. Baltin, Mark., "The logical problem of language acquisition", pp.257~295 (1981), MIT Press
  4. Baltin, Mark, "The Blackwell companion to syntax, 2", pp.237~271 (2005), Wiley-Blackwell
  5. Bošković, Željko, "What is sent to spell-out is phases, not phasal complements", Linguistica, 56(1), pp.25~66 (2016)
  6. Choe, Hyon Sook., "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics II", pp.40~56 (1987)
  7. Chomsky, Noam., "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  8. 정대호, "On the syntax of multi-focused fragment answers in Korean: An oblique merge analysis", 언어연구, 32(3), pp.573~606 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  9. 정대호, "On what determines the modification relation in Korean adnominal adjunct RDCs", 언어연구, 33(3), pp.351~370 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  10. Hiraiwa, Ken, "Syntactic metamorphosis: clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese", Syntax, 15(2), pp.142~180 (2012)
  11. Griffiths, James, "Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis", Syntax, 17, pp.189~234 (2014)
  12. Kamada, Kohji., "Rightward movement phenomena in human language", PhD, pp.2009
  13. Kim, Sung-Woong, "Hanging topic, pseudo-right dislocation and (pseudo) fragment answers", Talk presented at Occasional Workshop on Ellipsis (2013), Dongguk University
  14. 김종복, "Interactions between (pseudo-) cleft and copular constructions in Korean", 언어연구, 30(1), pp.93~139 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  15. 고희정, "Remarks on Right Dislocation Construction in Korean: Challenges to bi-clausal analyses", 어학연구, 50(2), pp.275~310 (2014), 언어교육원
  16. 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean", 어학연구, 51(1), pp.3~40 (2015), 언어교육원
  17. 고희정, "Gapless Right-Dislocation: The Role of Overt Correlates", 어학연구, 52(1), pp.3~32 (2016), 언어교육원
  18. Kuno, Susumu, (1978), Taishukan Shoten
  19. 이정훈, "왜 의문사는 후보충되지 않는가?", 현대문법연구, (72), pp.105~119 (2013), 현대문법학회
  20. 이정식, "A Resumption Strategy for Gapless Multiple Right Dislocation", 어학연구, 53(1), pp.23~58 (2017), 언어교육원
  21. 이수환, "Inalienable possession construction and passive markers inducing an idiomatic interpretation", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.239~272 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  22. 이수환, "Repetitive Right Dislocation Constructions and Repetitive Fragments: With Reference to Verbal Idioms in Korean", 인문논총, 45, pp.101~120 (2018), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
  23. Mahajan, Anoop., "Rightward movement", pp.185~213 (1997), John Benjamins
  24. Manetta, Emily, "Reconsidering rightward scrambling: postverbal constituents in Hindi-Urdu", Linguistics Inquiry, 43(1), pp.43~74 (2012)
  25. Merchant, Jason., "The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  26. Ott, Dennis, "Right-dislocation as deletion", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 34(2), pp.641~690 (2015)
  27. 박범식, "Case-drop, left-branch extraction and multiplicity in the right-dislocation construction", 언어연구, 33(2), pp.259~297 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  28. 박명관, "The Syntax of Afterthoughts in Korean: Move and Delete", 언어학, 17(4), pp.25~53 (2009), 대한언어학회[DOI]
  29. Ross, John. Robert., "Papers from the 5th regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society", pp.252~286 (1969), Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago
  30. Ross, John. Robert, "Infinite syntax" (1986), Ablex Publishing
  31. Sakamoto, Yuta, "Phase and argument ellipsis in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25, pp.243~274 (2016)
  32. Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.203~227 (2007), 언어교육원
  33. Shimojo, Mitsuaki, "Focus structure and morphosyntax in Japanese: wa and ga, and word order flexibility", PhD, pp.1995
  34. Simpson, Andrew, "The non-uniform syntax of postverbal elements in SOV Languages: Hindi, Bangla, and the rightward scrambling debate", Linguistic Inquiry, 46(3), pp.533~551 (2015)
  35. Takahashi, Daiko, "Sluicing in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.265~300 (1994)
  36. Takahashi, Daiko, "Apparent parasitic gaps and null arguments in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15, pp.1~35 (2006)
  37. Takita, Kensuke, "Pseudo-right dislocation, the bare-topic construction, and hanging topic constructions", Lingua, 140, pp.137~157 (2014)
  38. Tanaka, Hidekazu, "Right-dislocation as scrambling", Journal of Linguistics, 37, pp.551~579 (2001)
  39. Whitman, John., "Syntactic and functional exploration: In honor of Susumu Kuno", pp.445~470 (2000), Kurosio Publishers
  40. 임창국, "Bi-clausal Evidence for Right Dislocation in Korean", 생성문법연구, 23(1), pp.25~39 (2013), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  41. Yun, Suyeon., "Two types of right dislocation in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 15 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

우전위 구문 공백의 분포와 성질이정식한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2018 · 제28권 제4호Case-drop, left-branch extraction and multiplicity in the right-dislocation construction김효식, 박범식한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2016 · 제33권 제2호Fragmental Appendix in Korean Right Dislocation Construction이숙희한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2017 · 제27권 제3호On the Island-(In)Sensitivity in the Right-Dislocation Construction in Korean박범식, 오세랑언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2017 · 제83호VP-ellipsis in Right-dislocated Constructions이정식한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2017 · 제27권 제4호Pre- vs. Post-verbal Asymmetries and the Syntax of Korean Right Dislocated Construction정대호한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2012 · 제22권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

Remarks on the syntax and semantics of so-called comitative coordinationEman Al Khalafpp. 253-273Intervention effect, scope, and type-shifting김지은pp. 305-335Intervention effects in Persian: A pragmatic approach윤수연pp. 337-356A study of manner assimilation: focusing on word-initial [l]-avoidance, lateralization, and nasalization in Korean이세창pp. 357-379A comparison of the acoustic vowel spaces of speech and songEvan D. Bradleypp. 381-394
원문 보기