본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유네스코, 국가, 지방정부: 중국 연변조선족자치주의 사례를 통해 살펴본 유네스코 무형문화유산 제도의 지역적 적용

UNESCO, Nation state, Local government: Regional application of UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention in the case of Chinese Korean ethnic(Chaoxianzu) prefecture

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

UNESCO intangible cultural heritage convention has a certain influence to Chinese national government and regional government of Chinese Korean ethnic (Chaoxianzu) of the domains of intangible cultural heritage definition, the value of community participation and emphasis on living heritage. Chinese intangible cultural heritage law, however, shows a strong nationalism and sets ‘masterpiece’, which is the main value of world heritage rather than intangible cultural heritage, as a main criteria. The regulation of Yanbian Chaoxianzu prefecture does not put emphasis on national identity compared to national law, and gives more focus on transmitting person, but promotes branding by allotting singular heritage for each villages, which is against the value of cultural diversity. Under the circumstance of the vanishing community people, the importance of person in heritage is advocated by government and academia, but the actual participation of community people cannot be expected. The community is also facing the dilemma that for the protection of cultural heritage, commercialization is inevitable. Upon the urgency of registration of cultural heritage and the need for commercialization, the matter of authenticity is considered flexible. It partly reflects the nature of Chaoxianzu community which has no archetype to refer to, and also demonstrates the chance for revealing regional creativity. Turning to Korean case, intangible cultural property law still sticks to tradition and history, and follows standardized prototype. Considering the fact intangible cultural heritage puts importance on cultural diversity and community participation rather than outstanding universal value, regional creativity presented by Chaoxianzu intangible cultural heritage has implication to the Korean intangible cultural property policy.

Abstract

UNESCO intangible cultural heritage convention has a certain influence to Chinese national government and regional government of Chinese Korean ethnic (Chaoxianzu) of the domains of intangible cultural heritage definition, the value of community participation and emphasis on living heritage. Chinese intangible cultural heritage law, however, shows a strong nationalism and sets ‘masterpiece’, which is the main value of world heritage rather than intangible cultural heritage, as a main criteria. The regulation of Yanbian Chaoxianzu prefecture does not put emphasis on national identity compared to national law, and gives more focus on transmitting person, but promotes branding by allotting singular heritage for each villages, which is against the value of cultural diversity. Under the circumstance of the vanishing community people, the importance of person in heritage is advocated by government and academia, but the actual participation of community people cannot be expected. The community is also facing the dilemma that for the protection of cultural heritage, commercialization is inevitable. Upon the urgency of registration of cultural heritage and the need for commercialization, the matter of authenticity is considered flexible. It partly reflects the nature of Chaoxianzu community which has no archetype to refer to, and also demonstrates the chance for revealing regional creativity. Turning to Korean case, intangible cultural property law still sticks to tradition and history, and follows standardized prototype. Considering the fact intangible cultural heritage puts importance on cultural diversity and community participation rather than outstanding universal value, regional creativity presented by Chaoxianzu intangible cultural heritage has implication to the Korean intangible cultural property policy.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 권봉관, "‘내향적 정교화’(Involution)의 두 얼굴-현 시대 한국의 농악과 중국의 농악무-", 비교민속학, (54), pp.177~212 (2014), 비교민속학회
  2. 권봉관, "유네스코 등재 이후 조선족 농악무의 변화양상 고찰", 비교민속학, (69), pp.175~200 (2019), 비교민속학회[DOI]
  3. 남근우, "유네스코 무형문화유산 체제와 동아시아 민속학 - 중국과 일본의 경우를 중심으로 -", 민속학연구, (37), pp.123~144 (2015), 국립민속박물관[DOI]
  4. 박상미, "문화유산의 인류학: 쟁점과 연구방법론의 고찰", 제38차 한국문화인류학회 정기학술대회 자료집 (2005)
  5. 공정배, "<가야금산조>의 유네스코 세계무형문화유산 목록 등재와 관련된 한중 문화갈등의 배경과 대응 방안", 한국사상과 문화, (65), pp.355~388 (2012), 한국사상문화학회
  6. 이정원, "<아리랑>의 유네스코 세계무형문화유산 목록 등재로 비롯된 한중간 문화갈등 배경 연구 - 중국 조선족 문화의 이중정체성을 중심으로 -", 한민족문화연구, (40), pp.409~440 (2012), 한민족문화학회[DOI]
  7. 宋旭日, "연변 조선족 무형문화유산의 전승실태와 발전방안연구", 역사문화연구, (51), pp.239~274 (2014), 역사문화연구소
  8. 정수진, "무형문화유산의 문화정치학-유네스코 체제에 대한 한국의 대응을 중심으로-", 실천민속학 연구, 26, pp.287~316 (2015), 실천민속학회
  9. 정연학, "중국조선족 무형문화유산지정 현황과 문제점 - 연변조선족자치주를 중심으로 -", 민속연구, (33), pp.247~299 (2016), 민속학연구소
  10. 정준호, "중국 무형문화유산제도의 형성과 정책관리체계 연구", 한국자치행정학보, 29(1), pp.411~436 (2015), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  11. 최민호, "농악의 공연예술화, 그리고 전통으로의 회항: -중국조선족농악무의 전승과 보존-", 역사민속학, (47), pp.386~413 (2015), 한국역사민속학회
  12. 葛励闻, "延边朝鲜族自治州非物质文化遗产旅游开发浅析", 西部皮革, 40(2) (2018), 四川省皮革学会
  13. 葛励闻, "延边朝鲜族非物质文化遗产对当地经济的影响", 延边党校学报, 34(6) (2018), 中共延边州委党校
  14. 金庆姬, "朝鲜族非物质文化遗产(艺术)的价值与开发研究", 硕士, pp.2016
  15. 金晶, "延边朝鲜族非物质文化遗产研究", 硕士, pp.2016
  16. 刘芳华, "中国朝鲜族非物质文化遗产传承保护探析", 黑龙江民族丛刊, 6 (2017), 黑龙江省民族研究所
  17. 刘慰立, "论全球化背景下的中国非物质文化遗产保护", 河南社会科学, 1 (2007), 河南省社会科学界联合会
  18. 申明玉, "中国朝鲜族传统体育的“保护”与“享用” —基于非物质文化遗产的视角—", 延边大学学报, 51(5) (2018), 延边大学
  19. 易秀梅, "中国朝鲜族非物质文化遗产保护传承研究", 长春师范大学学报, 37(7) (2018), 长春师范大学
  20. 张钟月, "朝鲜族非物质文化遗产的保护与传承", 硕士, pp.2013
  21. 郑丽丽, "论黑龙江省朝鲜族非物质文化遗产的保护与传承", 黑龙江民族丛刊, 1 (2016), 黑龙江省民族研究所
  22. Sophia Labadi, "Heritage and Globalisation" (2010), Routledge
  23. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, "Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production", Museum International, 56 (2004), International Council of Museums

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)