본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Community Empowerment through Participatory Planning:Experiences of a Mining Town in Korea

심재만
한국농촌경제연구원 (Korea Rural Economic Institute)|2006.11|농촌경제 (Journal of Rural Development)|제29권 제4호|pp. 1-31

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

planning processlocal communityparticipatory planningcommunity empowermentmining town
주제분류농업경제학

초록

This research paper examines the interactions between planning practices aiming for the developmental reconstruction of a local society and actual changes onto the society. For the purpose, the research measures four procedural characteristics in the voluntary planning practice in a declining mining town; it also analyzes three dimensions of community empowerment in the mountainous town Churam. The paper demonstrates that each characteristics of the four procedural variables in planning practices contributes to the relative dimensions of community empowerment, and that each one of the three dimensions of community empowerment exerts an influence on the constitution of actual planning practices, reversely.Based on the case study, the paper concludes that there exists a mutual causality between planning practices and social development, depending on participatory measures for local people in the planning processes. Drawing on the conclusion, the paper suggests the significance of participatory planning processes in socio-political reconstruction of local communities; by the same token, it also legitimizes the understanding of local governments’ public planning not only as an economic enterprise but also as a socio-political one.

Abstract

This research paper examines the interactions between planning practices aiming for the developmental reconstruction of a local society and actual changes onto the society. For the purpose, the research measures four procedural characteristics in the voluntary planning practice in a declining mining town; it also analyzes three dimensions of community empowerment in the mountainous town Churam. The paper demonstrates that each characteristics of the four procedural variables in planning practices contributes to the relative dimensions of community empowerment, and that each one of the three dimensions of community empowerment exerts an influence on the constitution of actual planning practices, reversely.Based on the case study, the paper concludes that there exists a mutual causality between planning practices and social development, depending on participatory measures for local people in the planning processes. Drawing on the conclusion, the paper suggests the significance of participatory planning processes in socio-political reconstruction of local communities; by the same token, it also legitimizes the understanding of local governments’ public planning not only as an economic enterprise but also as a socio-political one.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. "New Trends in Urban Policies in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark", 20(2), pp.77~20 86 (2003)
  2. "Social Exclusion, Poverty and Unemployment,Exclusion", pp.1~20 (1998)
  3. "Combating Social Exclusion in Europe: The New Urban Policy Challenge", 37(5), pp.1097~1055 (2000)
  4. "Approaches to the Study of Social Structure" (1975), Free Press
  5. "The Limits of de Tocqueville: How Government Facilitates Organisational Capacity in Newcomer Communities", 31(5), pp.865~888 (2005)
  6. "Community Sociology" (2000), Seoul National University Press
  7. "Community Stories and Indicators for Evaluating Community Development", 30(4), pp.327~336 (1995)
  8. "Urban Policy and the Turn to Community", 68(3), pp.347~362 (1997)
  9. "Manifesto for a Relational Sociology", 103(2), pp.281~317 (1997)
  10. "Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency", 99(6), pp.1411~1454 (1994)
  11. "Rethinking Poverty: Empowerment and Citizen Rights", 48(2), pp.161~172 (1996)
  12. "Teaching Planning Theory", 14(3), pp.156~162 (1995)
  13. "Toward a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning Journal of the American Planning Association", pp.482~485 (1993)
  14. "The Politics of Alternative Development" (1992)
  15. "A Theory of Transactive Planning" (1973), Anchor Press
  16. "Action Planning for Cities: A Guide to Community Practice" (1997), John Wiley & Sons
  17. "Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning", 30(9), pp.1521~1714 (1998)
  18. "Collaborative Planning Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies" (1997)
  19. "Knowledge and Action in Communicative Practice Journal of the American Planning Association 58", pp.9~20 (1992)
  20. "Challenge and Creativity in Postmodern Planning", 69(2) (1998)
  21. "Planning Theory’s Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice", 14(3), pp.183~189 (1995)
  22. "Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: a Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning", 65(4), pp.412~423 (1999)
  23. "Democracy as a Condition for Environmental Policy Success: the Importance of Non-institutional Factors", pp.71~85 (1996), Problems and Prospects
  24. "Three Views of Associationalism in 19th Century America: An Empirical Examination", 104(5), pp.1296~1345 (1999)
  25. "Evaluation and Planning: Inseparable Concepts", 69(4), pp.359~374 (1998)
  26. "Cultural Marketing of Places" (2002), Hak-go-jae
  27. "Understandings of ‘Empowerment’ in the Public Administration", 5(1), pp.215~240 (2000)
  28. "The New Rural Village Construction Drive in the Era of Agricultural Autonomy: Its Significance and Tasks", 44(2), pp.133~152 (2003)
  29. "Social Network Theory" (2003), Park-young-sa
  30. "Social Structure and Agency" (1996), Na-nam
  31. "Journal of Environmental Studies 18", pp.34~48 (1986)
  32. "The Logic of Planning Process in Open Society Journal of Korea Planners’ Association 18", pp.99~106 (1983)
  33. "Community Participation and Empowerment: the Human Face of Structural Transformation", pp.1~11 (1995)
  34. "Planning and Community-led Rural Development in Northern Ireland", 12(4), pp.393~400 (1997)
  35. "Neighborhood Planning and Community-Based Development: The Potential and Limits of Grassroots Action" (2000), Sage Pub
  36. "Studies in Empowerment Introduction to the Issue Studies in Empowerment Step toward Understanding and Action", pp.1~7 (1984), The Haworth Press
  37. "Urban Regeneration: A Handbook" (2000), Sage Pub
  38. "Reexamination of Villagers-initiated Rural Planning and Development", 37(1), pp.169~179 (2002)
  39. "An Analysis of Relationship between the Successes and Failures of Rural Village Development Programs and Residents", 17(4), pp.293~320 (2005)
  40. "Social Exclusion: In What Sense a Planning Problem", 70(3), pp.363~384 (1999)
  41. "Economic Sociology" (1996), Na-nam
  42. "Empowerment Theory", pp.43~63 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

단계별 주민역량강화를 통한 농촌마을만들기의 효과 연구- 전라북도 진안군을 대상으로 -이원주, 이유직한국농촌계획학회 · 농촌계획2013 · 제19권 제4호도시 지역공동체의 시민참여와 지역역량 강화: 여수시 도시재생지원센터의 참여프로세스를 중심으로김일영한국학중앙연구원 · 한국학2024 · 제47권 제3호Rural Community Development and Policy Challenges in South Korea박덕병, 윤유식, 이민수한국경제지리학회 · 한국경제지리학회지2008 · 제11권 제4호Local Administrative System Transformation and Neighborhood Governance in South Korea곽현근한국지방자치학회 · 한국지방자치학회보2012 · 제24권 제4호Deciding Together: Citizen Participation in planning the Neighbourhood Improvement in Seoul and Singapore김수, 조임식, Blaz Kriznik아시아연구소 · 아시아리뷰2019 · 제8권 제2호도시개발과정에서 주민참여를 통한 이해갈등조정김두환, 이삼수, 이윤상제3섹터연구소 · 시민사회와 NGO2007 · 제5권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

Determinants of Farm Exit in Korea강혜정pp. 33-51Structural Change and Bipolarization of Korean Agriculture강혜정, 김정호pp. 53-72Economic Valuation of Environmentally Friendly Agriculture for Improving Environmental Quality김창길, 신용광pp. 73-86<Research Interest>Northeast Asian Agriculture:Cooperation or Competition?최세균pp. 87-109<Research Interest>Green Revolution in the 1970s in Korea: from Introduction to Disappearance of High-Yielding Rice Variety (Tong-il)Daniel A. Sumner, 김윤식pp. 111-136
원문 보기