준공영제 시내버스 정책 시행에 따른 무료환승요금제 정책효과 분석- 부산광역시를 중심으로 -
Analysis of the policy effect of the free transfer fare system according to the implementation of the Quasi-Public Operation system city bus policy - Focused on Busan Metropolitan City -
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To analyze the effect of the free transfer fare system in Busan. Based on the operation data from 2009 to 2020, we compared and analyzed before and after the free transfer fare system implemented in July 2015. The evaluation indicators were analyzed based on the number of card use cases, the total transport revenue, and the public transport transport share. In terms of total imports, 1934.071 × 1 million won (1,934,071,000 won) decreased significantly after the policy was introduced. However, it appears that the number of card transfers had a significant effect on transportation income. Therefore, the number of card transfers is 0.003 × 1 million (3,000), which has a positive effect (income decreases as the number of transfers increases). There is no clear divergence before and after the policy point, but transport revenue has been on the decline since the policy implementation. In terms of the number of card use cases, the number of passengers significantly decreased by 0.36527 × 1 million (365,270) after the policy was introduced. However, the number of card transfers has a significant effect on the number of card use cases. The number of transfers due to the free transfer rate system was 3.713527 × 1 million (3,713,527), which had a positive effect. Although the number of transfers has increased, the effect of the graph due to the decrease in the total number of passengers does not appear and is showing a downward trend. It also appears to be due to the decrease in the total number of users. In terms of the share of public transportation, when free transfers were introduced in July 2015, The transport share has already decreased by 0.00706%, Although a free transfer fare system was implemented, the share of public transportation has not been increased. The policy effect of the free transfer fare system for city buses had a slight positive effect on the total income and the increase in the number of city bus users. It had no effect on the overall income, increase in users, and the share of public transport.
Abstract
To analyze the effect of the free transfer fare system in Busan. Based on the operation data from 2009 to 2020, we compared and analyzed before and after the free transfer fare system implemented in July 2015. The evaluation indicators were analyzed based on the number of card use cases, the total transport revenue, and the public transport transport share. In terms of total imports, 1934.071 × 1 million won (1,934,071,000 won) decreased significantly after the policy was introduced. However, it appears that the number of card transfers had a significant effect on transportation income. Therefore, the number of card transfers is 0.003 × 1 million (3,000), which has a positive effect (income decreases as the number of transfers increases). There is no clear divergence before and after the policy point, but transport revenue has been on the decline since the policy implementation. In terms of the number of card use cases, the number of passengers significantly decreased by 0.36527 × 1 million (365,270) after the policy was introduced. However, the number of card transfers has a significant effect on the number of card use cases. The number of transfers due to the free transfer rate system was 3.713527 × 1 million (3,713,527), which had a positive effect. Although the number of transfers has increased, the effect of the graph due to the decrease in the total number of passengers does not appear and is showing a downward trend. It also appears to be due to the decrease in the total number of users. In terms of the share of public transportation, when free transfers were introduced in July 2015, The transport share has already decreased by 0.00706%, Although a free transfer fare system was implemented, the share of public transportation has not been increased. The policy effect of the free transfer fare system for city buses had a slight positive effect on the total income and the increase in the number of city bus users. It had no effect on the overall income, increase in users, and the share of public transport.
참고문헌 (33)
- 고재권, "Determinants of Contracting Back-In: New Public Management or Post-NPM?", 한국정책과학학회보, 18(3), pp.127~145 (2014), 한국정책과학학회
- 김광주, "지방정부조직의 생산성향상에 관한 연구: 정부생산성의 개념정의와 측정제고 모색", 한국행정논집, 8(1), pp.160~161 (1996), 한국행정학회
- 김명근, "공공효율성, 국가경쟁력, 삶의 질의 관계성에 관한 연구", 박사, 행정학, pp.2010
- 김수성, "대중교통 환승할인요금제 도입에 따른 수요예측에 관한 연구", 석사, 도시공학, pp.2003
- 김은영, "형평성 지표 개발을 통한 대중교통 환승요금제 개선방안 연구", 박사, pp.2021
- 남진우, "행정학", pp.150~152 (2019), 에듀윌
- 문장혁, "공공임대주택 입지가 주변지역 지가에 미치는 영향 : 실증적 DID분석", 박사, 도시공학과, pp.2012
- 문춘걸, "자료포락분석법 및 그 변형기법을 통한 공공부문의 생산성 측정: 한국 중소도시의 생산성 분석", 한국조세연구원, pp.39~40 (1998), 한국조세연구학회
- 박동서, "한국행정론" (1995), 법문사
- 박용치, "현대행정학원론" (1993), 고려원
- 교통조사서-승객통행량 조사결과보고서, "부산광역시", ~ (2021)
- 안현진, "시내버스 준공영제를 통한 운송관리 효율화 방안 연구", 석사, 토목환경공학, pp.2011
- 우수명, "마우스로 잡는 SPSS 12.0" (2006), 인간과 복지
- 이정동, "효율성 분석이론, DEA 자료포락분석" (2010), (주)지필미디어
- 이종훈, "독립ㆍ환승할인요금체계하의 환승요금가치를 고려한 도시철도 수요추정 연구", 대한교통학회지, 27(5), pp.155~162 (2009), 대한교통학회
- 이창호, "시내버스 노선의 효율성과 결정요인에 관한 연구-광주광역시 시내버스 준공영제를 사례로", 박사, pp.2017
- 전성욱, "정부출연연구기관 관리효율성에 미치는 영향요인 분석 : 경제·인문사회분야 정부출연연구기관을 중심으로", 박사, 행정학과 행정학전공, pp.2014
- 황경식, "롤즈의 정의론과 그 이후" (2009), 철학과 현실사
- 황기연, "대중교통 환승요금 적정 할인수준 추정", 대한교통학회지, 18(2), pp.27~37 (2000), 대한교통학회
- BOGNETTI, G, "LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: MAIN RESULTS OF A RESEARCH PROJECT BY CIRIEC INTERNATIONAL", Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(4), pp.1~21 (2012), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Bertrand, Marianne, "How Much Should We Trust Difference-in-Difference Estimates?", Quarterly journal of Economics, 119(1), pp.249~275 (2002)
- Berman, E., "Productivity Enhancement Efforts in Public and Nonprofit Organizations", Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(2), pp.207~217 (1998)
- Brinkerhoff, R., "Productivity Measurement: A Guide for Managers and Evaluators" (1990), Sage Publications
- Dassiou, X, "Public service markets: Their economics, institutional oversight and regulation", Palgrave Communications, pp.1~13 (2015)
- Heckman, J., "Characterizing selection bias using experimental data", Econometrica, 66(5), pp.1017~1098 (1998)
- Kari Watkins Simon, "Analysis of Recent Public Transit Ridership Trends", pp.108~ (2020), THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
- Kull, D., "Handbook on Public Budgeting and Financial Management", pp.555~558 (1983), Marcel Dekker
- Rubin, D. B., "Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation", Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3-4), pp.169~188 (2001)
- Robert, E., "Managing Public Programs: Balancing Politics, Administration, and Public Needs" (1989), Jossey-Bass Publisher
- Wart, V., "Contemporary Public Sector Productivity Values: Narrower Scope, Tougher Standards, and New Rules of the Game", Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(3), pp.326~347 (1999)
- ZATTI, A., "NEW ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS IN EUROPEAN LOCAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT: FROM MYTH TO REALITY", 83(4), pp.533~559 (2012), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- "국토교통부"[URL]
- "부산시청"[URL]
