본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지하수 보전가치 추정에 관한 연구

Estimation of Groundwater Conservation Values

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농업경제학

초록

The purpose of this research is to estimate the conservation values of Jeju groundwater by using the double bounded contingent valuation (DBCV) method, which is one of main methodologies to tackle non-use values of public goods. Jeju groundwater has been at the center of dispute over its development and conservation in recent years. The Samdasoo company, which extracts groundwater from Jeju Island and which occupies over 40% market share of the domestic water market, has a plan to expand the amount of groundwater extraction, while the conservation side continuously points out that the conservation value of Jeju groundwater is also as important as its market value now. With respect to this issue, the Dong-seo Research Group conducted a face-to-face survey (DBCV questionnaire) of 600 Jeju residents from July 13 to August 5, 2010. The result of the one-off conservation fund payment mechanism applied here found that the amount of additional WTP is ₩11,023 on average per household. The expanded total conservation benefit to all 219,771 households in Jeju is about ₩2.4billion. The result shows that ₩11,023 of WTP is at the equivalent level to its use value, the monthly tap water cost of ₩12,530 per household in 2008, and that the benefit of conserving groundwater in Jeju is no less than the present market value.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to estimate the conservation values of Jeju groundwater by using the double bounded contingent valuation (DBCV) method, which is one of main methodologies to tackle non-use values of public goods. Jeju groundwater has been at the center of dispute over its development and conservation in recent years. The Samdasoo company, which extracts groundwater from Jeju Island and which occupies over 40% market share of the domestic water market, has a plan to expand the amount of groundwater extraction, while the conservation side continuously points out that the conservation value of Jeju groundwater is also as important as its market value now. With respect to this issue, the Dong-seo Research Group conducted a face-to-face survey (DBCV questionnaire) of 600 Jeju residents from July 13 to August 5, 2010. The result of the one-off conservation fund payment mechanism applied here found that the amount of additional WTP is ₩11,023 on average per household. The expanded total conservation benefit to all 219,771 households in Jeju is about ₩2.4billion. The result shows that ₩11,023 of WTP is at the equivalent level to its use value, the monthly tap water cost of ₩12,530 per household in 2008, and that the benefit of conserving groundwater in Jeju is no less than the present market value.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. 동위원소를 이용한 제주도 서부지역 지하수의 질산성질소 오염원 연구, "강봉래", 제주발전연구원, ~ (2003)
  2. 곽승준, "서울시 생활요수 수요 추정 - 오차수정모형을 적용하여 -", 자원환경경제연구, 11(1), pp.81~97 (2002), 한국환경경제학회
  3. 고기원, "제주도 지하수의 특성과 수자원관리(Ⅰ)", 물과 미래, 39(7), pp.73~80 (2006)
  4. 김보경, "제주도민의 생태관광에 대한 인식에 관한 연구", 한국항공경영학회 2005년 춘계학술발표대회 (2005)
  5. 김용주, "팔당호 및 한강수질개선의 비시장가치 측정: 속성가치선택법을 이용하여", 자원환경경제연구, 14(2), pp.337~379 (2005), 한국환경경제학회
  6. 김용주, "새로운 분류체계를 이용한 수질변화의 경제적 가치 추정", 자원환경경제연구, 17(4), pp.875~901 (2008), 한국환경경제학회
  7. 김지영, "제주도 동부지역 지하수의 염수화에 관한 연구", 한국환경과학회지, 10(1), pp.47~58 (2001)
  8. 토양·지하수 경제적 가치평가 및 사례조사 연구, "김홍석", 연세대학교, ~ (2008)
  9. 2008년 제주 관광동향에 관한 연차보고서, "문성종", 제주특별자치도 관광협회, ~ (2008)
  10. 박원배, "제주도 지하수의 수위변동에 관한 연구", 한국환경과학회지, 3(4), pp.333~348 (1994)
  11. 신영철, "실험선택법을 이용한 확률적 인간생명가치 추정(암 검진 행위 분석을 중심으로)", 자원환경경제연구, 19(3), pp.683~699 (2007)
  12. 신효중, "북한강 상류지역의 수질개선에 따른 중․하류지역의 수익자 지불용의액 추정", 서울도시연구, 10(4), pp.91~106 (2009), 서울연구원
  13. 유승훈, "무응답 자료를 고려한 대도시 상수도 사용량의 결정요인 분석", 경제연구, 23(1), pp.223~246 (2005), 한국경제통상학회
  14. 윤정수, "제주도 지하수의 개발현황과 지역별 수위 및 수질변화 특성", 제주도연구, 11, pp.175~232 (1994)
  15. 오익근, "포커스그룹인터뷰의 관광연구 적용", 관광학연구, 30(1), pp.433~439 (2006), 한국관광학회
  16. 오홍식, "지하수 원수대금 부과제도 개선방안에 관한 연구", 석사, 행정학과, pp.2000
  17. 전철현, "비시장재화의 가치평가에 있어서 근접효과(Proximity Effects)의 검증에 관한 연구: 조건부가치평가법을 중심으로", 자원환경경제연구, 19(1), pp.101~127 (2010), 한국환경경제학회
  18. 전철현, "수질 악화로 인한 후생변화의 추정", 환경정책연구, 9(2), pp.135~155 (2010), 한국환경정책·평가연구원
  19. 전형우, "용수문화, 공공재, 그리고 지하수: 제주도 지하수개발의 반생태성을 중심으로", 12, pp.51~69 (1995)
  20. 제주도 수문지질 및 지하수자원 종합조사(3차), "제주도·한국수자원공사", ~ (2003)
  21. 제주지역 용수수요 전망과 수자원보전·관리계획에 관한 연구(, "제주발전연구원", ~, pp.기본연구 2009-7 (2009)
  22. 제주도 지리정보시스템의 효율적 운영방향, "제주발전연구원", ~ (2002)
  23. 제주도 농업용 관정의 양수량 산정과 지하수 이용특성연구, "제주발전연구원", ~, pp.정책연구 2003-18 (2003)
  24. 제주도 지하수 함양량 재평가 용역(중간성과), "제주도·한국수자원공사", ~ (2003)
  25. 제주물비젼 2030 수립을 위한 기초연구, "제주발전연구원", ~ (2008)
  26. 제주지역 용수수요전망과 수자원 보전·관리계획에 관한 연구, "제주발전연구원", ~ (2009)
  27. 지하수 공수관리제도의 개선방안 연구, "제주발전연구원", ~ (2007)
  28. 지하수의 전략적 활용 및 브랜드화 연구, "제주발전연구원", ~, pp.정책연구 2007-18 (2007)
  29. 한국상수도협회, "2008 상수도 통계자료", ~ (2009)
  30. Alberini, A., "Handbook on Contingent Valuation" (2006), Edward Elgar
  31. Arrow, K., "Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation", Federal Register, 58, pp.4601~4614 (1993)
  32. Birol, E., "Using Economic Valuation Techniques to inform Water Resources Management: A Study and Critical Appraisal of Available Techniques and an Application", Science of the Total Environment, 365, pp.105~122 (2006)
  33. Bateman, I. J., "Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: a manual" (2002), Edward Elgar
  34. Bateman, I.J., "Valuing Environmental Preferences" (2001), Oxford University Press
  35. Boxall, P. C., "Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach", Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), pp.421~446 (2002)
  36. Costanza, R., "Ecological Economics" (2002)
  37. Cramer, J. S., "Logit Models from Economics and Other Fields" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  38. Greene. W. H., "LIMDEP 8.0 Manual" (1998), Econometric Software
  39. Greene. W. H., "Econometric Analysis. 5th edition" (2003), Pretence Hall
  40. Gleick, P. H., "The World's Water 2008~2009" (2009)
  41. Haab, T. C., "Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources" (2003), Edward-Elgar
  42. Hanemann, M. W., "Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Exeriments with Discrete Responses", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, pp.332~341 (1984)
  43. Hanemann, M. W., "Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses Data: Reply", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, pp.1057~1061 (1989)
  44. Hanemann, M. W., "Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, pp.1255~1263 (1991)
  45. Hiscock, K.M., "Sustainable Groundwater Development", pp.1~14 (2002), Geological Society
  46. Hellgers, P., "Dynamics of Agricultural Groundwater extraction", Ecological Economics, 37, pp.303~311 (2001)
  47. IUCN, "Comperhensive Protected Areas System Composition and Monitoring" (2003), IUCN World Conservation Union
  48. Loomis, J., "Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey", Ecological Economics, 33, pp.103~117 (2000)
  49. Maddala, G.S., "Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Economics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  50. Poe, G.L., "Valuing the Incremental Benefits of Groundwater Protection when Exposure Levels are Known", Environmental and Resource Economics, 13, pp.341~367 (1999)
  51. Pinsent Masons, "Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2007~2008" (2007)
  52. Rubio, A. J., "Strategic Behavior and Efficiency in the Common Property Extraction of Groundwater", Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, pp.73~87 (2003)
  53. Shin, H-J., "Identifying the Relationship Between Preservation Values of Environmental Resources", 박사, pp.1994
  54. Stenger, A., "Preservation Value of Groundwater Quality in a large aquifer: A Contingent-Valuation Study of the Alsatian Aquifer", Journal of Environmental Management, 53, pp.177~193 (1998)
  55. Train, K. E., "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  56. UNEP, "Water Quality Outlook", UNEP GEMS
  57. Walsh, Richard G., "Valuing Option, Existence and Bequest Demands for Wilderness", Land Economics, 60, pp.14~29 (1984)
  58. Wild, D., "Water: a market of the future", SAM study (2007)
  59. Wooldridge. J. M., "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data" (2001), The MIT Press
  60. Wooldridge. J. M., "Introductory Econometrics" (2006), Thomson South-Western

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)