본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지능형 로봇법 개선방안에 관한 연구

A Study on the Improvement of the Intelligent Robots Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

The intelligent robot industry is a complex which encompasses all fields of science and technology, and its marketability and industrial impact are remarkable. Major countries in the world have been strengthening their policies to foster the intelligent robot industry, but discussions on liability issues and legal actions that are accompanied by the related big or small accidents are still insufficient. In this study, therefore, the patent law by artificial intelligence robots and the legislation for relevant legal actions at the criminal law level are presented. Patent law legislation by artificial intelligence robots should comply with the followings. First, the electronic human being other than humans ought to be given legal personality, which is the subject of patent infringement. Even if artificial intelligence has legal personality, legal responsibility will be varied depending on the judgment of whether the accident has occurred due to the malfunction of the artificial intelligence itself or due to the human intervention with malicious intention. Second, artificial intelligence as a subject of actors and responsibility should be distinguished strictly; in other words, the injunction is the responsibility of the intelligent robot itself, but the financial repayment is the responsibility of the owner. In the criminal law legislation, regulations for legal punishment of intelligent robot manufacturing companies and manufacturers should be prepared promptly in case of legal violation, by amending the scope of application of Article 47 (Penal Provisions) of the Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act. In this way, joint penal provisions, which can clearly distinguish the responsibilities of the related parties, should be established to contribute to the development of the fourth industrial revolution

Abstract

The intelligent robot industry is a complex which encompasses all fields of science and technology, and its marketability and industrial impact are remarkable. Major countries in the world have been strengthening their policies to foster the intelligent robot industry, but discussions on liability issues and legal actions that are accompanied by the related big or small accidents are still insufficient. In this study, therefore, the patent law by artificial intelligence robots and the legislation for relevant legal actions at the criminal law level are presented. Patent law legislation by artificial intelligence robots should comply with the followings. First, the electronic human being other than humans ought to be given legal personality, which is the subject of patent infringement. Even if artificial intelligence has legal personality, legal responsibility will be varied depending on the judgment of whether the accident has occurred due to the malfunction of the artificial intelligence itself or due to the human intervention with malicious intention. Second, artificial intelligence as a subject of actors and responsibility should be distinguished strictly; in other words, the injunction is the responsibility of the intelligent robot itself, but the financial repayment is the responsibility of the owner. In the criminal law legislation, regulations for legal punishment of intelligent robot manufacturing companies and manufacturers should be prepared promptly in case of legal violation, by amending the scope of application of Article 47 (Penal Provisions) of the Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act. In this way, joint penal provisions, which can clearly distinguish the responsibilities of the related parties, should be established to contribute to the development of the fourth industrial revolution

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김윤명, "지능정보사회에 대한 규범적 논의와 법정책적 대응", 정보화정책, 23(4), pp.24~37 (2016), 한국지능정보사회진흥원[DOI]
  2. Trends and Prospects of Robot Industry at Domestic and International Levels, "Kwon, Koo Bok", Korean Development Bank, 74~ (2016)
  3. Ji, Soo Young, "Intelligent Robots", TTA Journal, 158, pp.7~ (2015)
  4. Ryu, Hwa Jin, "Criminality and Criminal Responsibility of Intelligent Robots", Science and Technology Law, 7(2), pp.69~ (2015), Chungbuk National University, Institute of Law Research
  5. A Study on Legal Issues in the Era of Artificial Intelligence, "Jang, Min Sun", Korea Legislation Research Institute, 58~59 (2018)
  6. Lee, Sang Hyung, "Is Ethical Artificial Intelligence Possible? – Moral and Legal Liability Problems of Artificial Intelligence", Law and Policy Research, 16(4), pp.286~289 (2016), Korean Legal Policy Institute
  7. The U.S. Autonomous Driving Policy and Implications of Google's Autonomous Car Patents, "Cha, Won Yong", Korea Institute of Technology Evaluation and Planning, 61~, pp.KISTEPInl No. 14 (2016)
  8. Lee, Joong Gi, "Legal Handling of a Robot with Artificial Intelligence: Focusing on the Legal Recognition and Responsibility of Autonomous Driving Accident", Hongik Law Review, 17(2016), pp.19~20 (2016), The Law Research Institute of Hongik University
  9. Jeong, Jeong Won, "A Legal Discussion on the Development of Artificial Intelligence", Science and Technology Law, 7(2), pp.202~ (2016), Chungbuk National University, Institute of Law Research
  10. 박광민, "기업에 대한 형사책임귀속의 바람직한 방안", 성균관법학, 27(3), pp.69~96 (2015), 법학연구원[DOI]
  11. Kim, Jae Yoon, "A Study on the UK Business and Actual Justice Law and Implications", Criminal Policy Research, 25(4), pp.186~ (2014), Korea Criminal Policy Institute
  12. 손영화, "인공지능(AI) 시대의 법적 과제", 법과정책연구, 16(4), pp.305~329 (2016), 한국법정책학회[DOI]
  13. Lee, Joo Hee, "A Study on the Criminal Liabilities of Artificial Intelligence and Law-Intelligent Robots and Operators", Korean Social Science Research, 38(1), pp.137~ (2016), Cheongju University, Institute of Social Science Research

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)