The Study on the CRIMINAL Subject and Liability of AI Robots
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the midst of the advancement of cutting-edge science and technology, the wave of the fourth Industrial Revolution that has come to the front, there are new types of crime that have not been seen before. The advent of such a dangerous society also results in changes in the role and function of the criminal Law, so the change and the modification of the preexisting criminal theories are called for. This paper also focuses on this point. Especially, the main focus is regarding whether to recognize the criminal identity of the Artificial Intelligence robot and the measure to impute criminal responsibility to it which can be called as the leader of the fourth industrial revolution. At first, regarding whether or not to recognize the criminal identity of the Artificial Intelligence robot, I examined whether it was acceptable or not on the basis of theoretical views that affirm the criminal ability of a corporation. Through these discussions, I could confirm that this frame of thought that only the natural person can have the ability of acting and responsibility should be broken, if Artificial Intelligence robots become recognized as criminal identity later. Next, I point out the there is no legislation in Korea yet in preparation for accidents which caused by Artificial Intelligence robots malfunctions, although these occur frequently. So, I suggested desirable legislative direction. In addition, I examined the possibility of impute the responsibility to the manufacturer and owner related to the penal code interpretation theory, in order to cope with the emergence of strong Artificial Intelligence in the future. At present, the fourth Industrial Revolution is moving forward faster than any other in the past. Also, the development of Artificial Intelligence will further accelerate. Thus, with the change and amendment of the criminal law, fundamental changes will be required beyond the level of simple reconstruction. I expect new legislation to be devised quickly in the near future, with the support of new theories to prove the appropriateness of punishment related to accidents caused by Artificial Intelligence robots malfunctions.
Abstract
In the midst of the advancement of cutting-edge science and technology, the wave of the fourth Industrial Revolution that has come to the front, there are new types of crime that have not been seen before. The advent of such a dangerous society also results in changes in the role and function of the criminal Law, so the change and the modification of the preexisting criminal theories are called for. This paper also focuses on this point. Especially, the main focus is regarding whether to recognize the criminal identity of the Artificial Intelligence robot and the measure to impute criminal responsibility to it which can be called as the leader of the fourth industrial revolution. At first, regarding whether or not to recognize the criminal identity of the Artificial Intelligence robot, I examined whether it was acceptable or not on the basis of theoretical views that affirm the criminal ability of a corporation. Through these discussions, I could confirm that this frame of thought that only the natural person can have the ability of acting and responsibility should be broken, if Artificial Intelligence robots become recognized as criminal identity later. Next, I point out the there is no legislation in Korea yet in preparation for accidents which caused by Artificial Intelligence robots malfunctions, although these occur frequently. So, I suggested desirable legislative direction. In addition, I examined the possibility of impute the responsibility to the manufacturer and owner related to the penal code interpretation theory, in order to cope with the emergence of strong Artificial Intelligence in the future. At present, the fourth Industrial Revolution is moving forward faster than any other in the past. Also, the development of Artificial Intelligence will further accelerate. Thus, with the change and amendment of the criminal law, fundamental changes will be required beyond the level of simple reconstruction. I expect new legislation to be devised quickly in the near future, with the support of new theories to prove the appropriateness of punishment related to accidents caused by Artificial Intelligence robots malfunctions.
참고문헌 (13)
- Ryu HJ, "The Study on the Criminal Subject and Liability of Intelligence Robots", Science and Technology Law, 7(2), pp.39~47 (2016)
- Jung CY, "Artificial Intelligence and Discourse on Law from the Viewpoint of Legal Paradigm Change", Law and Society, 53, pp.113~125 (2016)
- Kim HJ, "Attempts to Analyze Philosophical Concepts of Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence", Exploring Philosophy, 43, pp.114~121 (2016)
- Kim YH., "Liability Structure in Dangerous Society", Hongik law, 14(1), pp.825~851 (2011)
- Eric Hilgendorf, "Jenseits von Mensch und Maschine. Ethische und rechtlich e Fragen zumUmgang mit Robotern", pp.315~331 (2012), Kunstlicher Intelligenz und Cyborgs
- Jung JW, "The Moral Legal A rgument according to the Development of Artificial Intelligence", Science and Technology Law, 7(2), pp.202~208 (2016)
- Gabriel Hallevy, "The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control", Akron Intellectual Property Jounal, 4(2), pp.176~177 (2010)
- Park KM, "Desirable Method of Attributing Criminal Responsibility to Corporations", Sungkyunkwan Law Review, 27(3), pp.68~71 (2015)
- Lee JH., "Artificial Intelligence and Law A Study on Criminal Liability of Intelligent Robots and Operators", Korea Social Science Research, 38(1), pp.137~138 (2016)
- Son YH, "Legal Challenges in the AI Period", 16, pp.315~319 (2016)
- Klaus Schuberts, "Schuberts Fourth Industrial Revolution" (2016), New Present
- Advanced Method of Criminal Justice Using Forensic Science 6. Reserch Series 15 B 16, "Yoon JY", Korea Institude of Criminology, ~ (2015)
- Eric Hilgendorf, "Robotik und Gesetzgebung" (2013), Nomos
