본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1인가구의 세대별 생활만족도에 관한 종단분석

Longitudinal Analysis of Life Satisfaction by Generation of Single-Person Households

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

본 연구는 한국복지패널(KOWEPS)의 11차 년도(2016년)부터 15차 년도(2020년)까지 조사가 완료된 5개년도 자료를 활용하여 1인 가구 중심으로 세대별 각 개인의 생활만족도를 잠재성장모형을 이용하여 종단으로 분석하는 연구이다. 세대 구분은 사회화 과정, 역사적 사건, 기술의 발달 등을 요소로 하여 결정적 국면의 전환을 가져온 코호트가 경험한 중대한 사건의 분기점을 기준으로 하였다. 본 연구에서 사용된 분석 자료는 한국복지패널 15차 년도(2020년) 27,447명 중 지난 5개 년도에서1차 년도라도 1인 가구였던 2,778명을 대상으로 하여, 5년 동안 지속적으로 1인가구인 1,448명중1922년생부터 1944년생(843명)을 제외하고 1945년생부터 1996년생까지 605명을 대상으로 하였다. 연구 결과 X세대(신세대)보다는 Y세대(밀레니얼세대), 베이비부머세대 보다는 X세대가 높은 전반적인 생활만족도를 보였으며, 세대별 전반적인 생활만족도가 변화율에는 영향을 미치지 못하기때문에 각 세대별 모두가 이러한 차이는 지속적으로 동일하게 유지된다는 것을 파악하였다.

Abstract

This study uses data from the 11th year(2016) to the 15th year(2020) of the Korea Welfare Panel(KOWEPS) for the five years that the survey was completed to predict the life satisfaction of each individual by generation, centered on single-person households. This is a longitudinal analysis using a latent growth model. The generational division was based on the turning point of a major event experienced by the cohort that brought about a decisive change in the socialization process, historical event, and technological development as factors. The analysis data used in this study were of 27,447 persons in the 15th year of the Korea Welfare Panel(2020), 2,778 persons who were single-person households even in the first year from the last 5 years, and 1,448 persons who were single-person households continuously for 5 years. Excluding those born in 1922 to 1944(843 persons), 605 persons born between 1945 and 1996 were included. As a result of the study, Generation Y(millennials) than Generation X(new generation) and Generation X generation than Baby Boomers showed higher overall life satisfaction. Since overall life satisfaction by generation does not have an effect on the rate of change, it was found that this difference remains the same for all generations.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Chsung, "Increase in Single-Person Households and Policy Responses", ~ (2020)
  2. Expansion of Discussion on Policy Responses to the Increase in Single-Person Household, "Mjhwang", Korea Consumer Agency, Policy Lab, ~ (2020)
  3. "Statistics Korea" (2021)[URL]
  4. Seoul City Council, "The Concept of a One-Person Household", ~ (2015)
  5. Chsung, "Increase in Single-Person Households and Policy Responses", ~ (2020)
  6. "Population and Housing Census" (2021)[URL]
  7. Korea One-person Households Report, "Injung, Syoh", KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC. Single Family Research Center of Management Research Institute, 17~ (2020)
  8. Mjkim, "A study on time use of employed single households", Dept. Child & Family Welfare, pp.2017
  9. "rea Economy"[URL]
  10. Ytcho, "Next Year(2020), Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Millennial will all Change", pp.2019
  11. Neugarten, "The Measurement of Life Satisfaction", Journal of Gerontologist, 16, pp.141~ (1961)
  12. Kalish, R. A., "Aging self and personality Late Adulteni perpectives on Human Development" (1975), Caili Wordsworth Publishing company
  13. Sjchoi, "A Study on the Development of Life Satisfaction Scale for the Elderly", Ewha Womans University Journal of Social Sciences, 49, pp.235~258 (1986)
  14. Hjlee, "A Study on Socioeconomic and Spatial Issues Related to the Life of the Elderly in the Low-Income Class in Korea", Ewha Womans University Korean Culture Research Institute, 34(8), pp.239~288 (1979)
  15. 손진분, "한부모 가정의 생활만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인", 가족자원경영과 정책, 11(3), pp.45~65 (2007), 한국가족자원경영학회
  16. Schalock, R. L.., "Reconsidering the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life", ~ (1996)
  17. Duncan T. E., "An Introduction to Latent Growth Curve Modeling", Behavior Therapy, 35(2), pp.333~363 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)