Evaluation of the learning curve for external cephalic version using cumulative sum analysis
3
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: We evaluated the learning curve for external cephalic version (ECV) using learning curve-cumulative sum (LC-CUSUM) analysis. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving 290 consecutive cases between October 2013 and March 2017. We evaluated the learning curve for ECV on nulli and over para 1 group using LC-CUSUM analysis on the assumption that 50% and 70% of ECV procedures succeeded by description a trend-line of quadratic function with reliable R2 values. Results: The overall success rate for ECV was 64.8% (188/290), while the success rate for nullipara and over para 1 groups was 56.2% (100/178) and 78.6% (88/112), respectively. ‘H’ value, that the actual failure rate does not differ from the acceptable failure rate, was -3.27 and -1.635 when considering ECV success rates of 50% and 70%, respectively. Consequently, in order to obtain a consistent 50% success rate, we would require 57 nullipara cases, and in order to obtain a consistent 70% success rate, we would require 130 nullipara cases. In contrast, 8 to 10 over para 1 cases would be required for an expected success rate of 50% and 70% on over para 1 group. Conclusion: Even a relatively inexperienced physician can experience success with multipara and after accumulating experience, they will manage nullipara cases. Further research is required for LC-CUSUM involving several practitioners instead of a single practitioner. This will lead to the gradual implementation of standard learning curve guidelines for ECV.
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated the learning curve for external cephalic version (ECV) using learning curve-cumulative sum (LC-CUSUM) analysis. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving 290 consecutive cases between October 2013 and March 2017. We evaluated the learning curve for ECV on nulli and over para 1 group using LC-CUSUM analysis on the assumption that 50% and 70% of ECV procedures succeeded by description a trend-line of quadratic function with reliable R2 values. Results: The overall success rate for ECV was 64.8% (188/290), while the success rate for nullipara and over para 1 groups was 56.2% (100/178) and 78.6% (88/112), respectively. ‘H’ value, that the actual failure rate does not differ from the acceptable failure rate, was -3.27 and -1.635 when considering ECV success rates of 50% and 70%, respectively. Consequently, in order to obtain a consistent 50% success rate, we would require 57 nullipara cases, and in order to obtain a consistent 70% success rate, we would require 130 nullipara cases. In contrast, 8 to 10 over para 1 cases would be required for an expected success rate of 50% and 70% on over para 1 group. Conclusion: Even a relatively inexperienced physician can experience success with multipara and after accumulating experience, they will manage nullipara cases. Further research is required for LC-CUSUM involving several practitioners instead of a single practitioner. This will lead to the gradual implementation of standard learning curve guidelines for ECV.
참고문헌 (10)
- 김미영, "External cephalic version experiences in Korea", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 59(2), pp.85~90 (2016), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
- Hofmeyr GJ, "External cephalic version for breech presentation at term", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, pp.CD000083~ (2000)
- Hutton EK, "The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies", BJOG, 118, pp.564~577 (2011)
- Zhang Q, "The learning curve for minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM)", J Orthop Surg Res, 9, pp.81~ (2014)
- Teoh TG, "Effect of learning curve on the outcome of external cephalic version", Singapore Med J, 38, pp.323~325 (1997)
- 임성묵, "누적합법을 이용한 초음파 유도하 진공 보조 생검 시술의 학습곡선 분석", Journal of Breast Disease, 3(2), pp.43~47 (2015), 한국유방암학회[DOI]
- 서강열, "학습곡선-누적합 분석을 이용한 흉부압박의 능숙도 평가", 대한응급의학회지, 21(3), pp.293~298 (2010), 대한응급의학회
- Burgos J, "Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study", BJOG, 121, pp.230~235 (2014)
- Tan JM, "Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation", BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 10, pp.3~ (2010)
- Guirguis GF, "External cephalic version", Top Obstet Gynecol, 36, pp.1~5 (2016)
