Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveTo increase the rate of successful external cephalic version (ECV) and to minimize the complications, it is important toidentify the predictors of success. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the height of theelevated fetal buttock (HOB) is a valuable predictor of successful ECV or not. MethodsThis prospective study was conducted from August 2016 to June 2018. A total of 139 pregnant women with breechpresentation were enrolled in the study. HOB from the maternal pubic symphysis was measured on ultrasonography. The predictability and cut-off value of HOB for successful ECV were evaluated. ResultsAmong the 139 patients, 114 (82%) had successful ECV. The adjusted odds ratio for multiparity, amniotic fluid index(AFI) >14 cm, and HOB >7.8 cm were 10.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–74.94), 5.26 (95% CI, 1.06–26.19), and10.50 (95% CI, 1.03–107.12), respectively. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for AFI, HOB, and parity were 0.66 (95% CI,0.54–0.78), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64–0.85), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62–0.76), respectively. HOB had the largest AUC, but therewere no significant differences among the AUCs of other factors. The cut-off value of HOB was 6 cm. ConclusionThis study showed that the AUC of HOB was greater than that of parity and AFI, although it was not statisticallysignificant. As HOB is a noninvasive and comprehensive marker to predict successful ECV, consideration of HOB wouldbe helpful before conducting ECV. Further studies are needed.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo increase the rate of successful external cephalic version (ECV) and to minimize the complications, it is important toidentify the predictors of success. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the height of theelevated fetal buttock (HOB) is a valuable predictor of successful ECV or not. MethodsThis prospective study was conducted from August 2016 to June 2018. A total of 139 pregnant women with breechpresentation were enrolled in the study. HOB from the maternal pubic symphysis was measured on ultrasonography. The predictability and cut-off value of HOB for successful ECV were evaluated. ResultsAmong the 139 patients, 114 (82%) had successful ECV. The adjusted odds ratio for multiparity, amniotic fluid index(AFI) >14 cm, and HOB >7.8 cm were 10.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–74.94), 5.26 (95% CI, 1.06–26.19), and10.50 (95% CI, 1.03–107.12), respectively. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for AFI, HOB, and parity were 0.66 (95% CI,0.54–0.78), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64–0.85), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62–0.76), respectively. HOB had the largest AUC, but therewere no significant differences among the AUCs of other factors. The cut-off value of HOB was 6 cm. ConclusionThis study showed that the AUC of HOB was greater than that of parity and AFI, although it was not statisticallysignificant. As HOB is a noninvasive and comprehensive marker to predict successful ECV, consideration of HOB wouldbe helpful before conducting ECV. Further studies are needed.
참고문헌 (10)
- Hannah ME, "Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term : a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group", Lancet, 356, pp.1375~1383 (2000)
- 김미영, "External cephalic version experiences in Korea", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 59(2), pp.85~90 (2016), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
- Hofmeyr GJ, "External cephalic version for breech presentation at term", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, pp.CD000083~ (2015)
- Morgan ER, "Predictors of a successful external cephalic version : a population-based study of Washington state births", Women Birth, 32, pp.e421~6 (2019)
- "ACOG Committee opinion No. 745: mode of term singleton breech delivery", Obstet Gynecol, 132, pp.e60~3 (2018)
- Burgos J, "A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 112, pp.48~51 (2011)
- 김소윤, "Evaluation of the learning curve for external cephalic version using cumulative sum analysis", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 60(4), pp.343~349 (2017), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
- Kok M, "Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36weeks", Am J Perinatol, 28, pp.103~110 (2011)
- Mowat A, "Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital", Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 54, pp.59~63 (2014)
- Yoshida M, "Effectiveness of epidural anesthesia for external cephalic version(ECV)", J Perinatol, 30, pp.580~583 (2010)
