External cephalic version experiences in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate obstetric outcomes of external cephalic version (ECV) performed at or near term. MethodsSingle pregnant woman with breech presentation at or near term (n=145), who experienced ECV by one obstetrician from November 2009 to July 2014 in our institution were included in the study. Maternal baseline characteristic and fetal ultrasonographic variables were checked before the procedure. After ECV, the delivery outcomes of the women were gathered. Variables affecting the success or failure of ECV were evaluated. ResultsSuccess rate of ECV was 71.0% (n=103). Four variables (parity, amniotic fluid index, fetal spine position and rotational direction) were observed to be in correlation with success or failure of ECV. In contactable 83 individuals experienced successful ECV, cesarean delivery rates were 18.1%, 28.9%, and 5.3% in total, nulliparas, and multiparas, respectively. ConclusionBased on the results, ECV is proposed to be safe for both mother and her fetus. In addition, it is a valuable procedure that increases probability of vaginal delivery for women with breech presentation.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate obstetric outcomes of external cephalic version (ECV) performed at or near term. MethodsSingle pregnant woman with breech presentation at or near term (n=145), who experienced ECV by one obstetrician from November 2009 to July 2014 in our institution were included in the study. Maternal baseline characteristic and fetal ultrasonographic variables were checked before the procedure. After ECV, the delivery outcomes of the women were gathered. Variables affecting the success or failure of ECV were evaluated. ResultsSuccess rate of ECV was 71.0% (n=103). Four variables (parity, amniotic fluid index, fetal spine position and rotational direction) were observed to be in correlation with success or failure of ECV. In contactable 83 individuals experienced successful ECV, cesarean delivery rates were 18.1%, 28.9%, and 5.3% in total, nulliparas, and multiparas, respectively. ConclusionBased on the results, ECV is proposed to be safe for both mother and her fetus. In addition, it is a valuable procedure that increases probability of vaginal delivery for women with breech presentation.
참고문헌 (20)
- "Births:method of delivery" (2015)[URL]
- 정성훈, "Changes in the Cesarean Section Rate in Korea (1982–2012) and a Review of the Associated Factors", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 29(10), pp.1341~1352 (2014), 대한의학회
- Kok M, "Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, pp.76~84 (2009)
- "Committee on Practice Guidelines: Gynecology, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. External cephalic version", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 72, pp.198~204 (2001)
- Chan LY, "Intrapartum cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version : a meta-analysis", Obstet Gynecol, 104, pp.155~160 (2004)
- Bradley-Watson PJ, "The decreasing value of external cephalic version in modern obstetric practice", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 123, pp.237~240 (1975)
- Hofmeyr GJ, "External cephalic version for breech presentation at term", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10 (2012)
- Boucher M, "The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version : a 14-year experience", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189, pp.751~754 (2003)
- Newman RB, "Predicting success of external cephalic version", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 169(2 Pt 1), pp.245~249 (1993)
- Kok M, "Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36weeks", Am J Perinatol, 28, pp.103~110 (2011)
- Burgos J, "Does fetal weight estimated by ultrasound really affect the success rate of external cephalic version?", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 88, pp.1101~1106 (2009)
- Kirkinen P, "Ultrasonic examination before external version of breech presentation", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 13, pp.90~97 (1982)
- Vezina Y, "Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term : a comparative study", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 190, pp.763~768 (2004)
- Chan LY, "High incidence of obstetric interventions after successful external cephalic version", BJOG, 109, pp.627~631 (2002)
- Kuppens SM, "Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version : comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery", J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 35, pp.883~888 (2013)
- Lau TK, "Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 176(1 Pt 1), pp.218~223 (1997)
- de Hundt M, "Mode of delivery after successful external cephalic version : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Obstet Gynecol, 123, pp.1327~1334 (2014)
- Eun Ha Jeong, "Clinical and sonographic parameters at mid-trimester and the risk of cesarean delivery in low-risk nulliparas", Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 43(4), pp.235~242 (2015), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
- Kim SN, "Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks’gestation for predicting the risk of primary cesarean delivery in nulliparous women", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 36, pp.486~492 (2010)
- Clock C, "Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis", J Perinatol, 29, pp.96~100 (2009)