본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

금강산 유람의 통시적 고찰을 위한 시론 -불교적 성지 순례, ‘수양’에서 ‘구경’ 혹은 ‘관광’에 이르기까지-

Chronological change of Sightseeing Mt. 'Keumgang' in the historical context

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study overviews the social recognition perspectives of sightseeing Mt. Keumgang,‘Keumgangsan yuram’ through the history. The way of sightseeing Mt. Keumgang and its meaning in the sociocultural context were discussed. The study of this kind, if concerned only a certain short period could not bear the various aspects and those cultural implication. Especially the studies on ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ in Japanese colonial periods may elude the touring activity as a passive consumption of the Japanese tourism policy. I tried to treat the ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ as a long tradition of Korean folks even those may had been biased toward higher class in the past. Korean people had traveled Mt. Keumgang as cultural deeds objectively, literatured by Hwan-rang in Sila Dynasty or Wang-geon in early Goryeo. Detail documentation could be traced back to the late Goryeo, when not only the noble class but also the folk travelled Mt. Keumgang with their family in sort of Buddhist pilgrimage. In Joseon Dynasty, it became a kind of mind training for the gentry who want pursue Confucianism, and an amusement for others. Even though ‘Yusan’ of Joseon gentry such as ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ settled down about the 17th century. Around late 17th and 18th century,Keumgangsan yuram became more popular and secular by 'Nong-yeon scholar group who considered ‘sansuyuram’ as “Heung”, fun and “Quoi”, enjoyment, and brought down the “sansu”as the object for valuation. Finally in late 19th century, even poor regional ‘yangban’ and some women tried to have sightseeing of Mt. Keumgang. In this periods ‘Keumgangsan yuram’became quite spread out even to rich middle class people in Korea. There was no more mind training or pilgrimage, but it became enjoyment and a source of pride. In Japanese periods,many of Keumgangsan tourists were told that they seemed to passively accept the Japanese colonial modern tourism policy. I assume some korean people tried to practice or follow Keumgangsan tour in the historical or traditional ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ context even under the Japanese colonial periods cause it implies lots of meaning in Korean history and culture.

Abstract

This study overviews the social recognition perspectives of sightseeing Mt. Keumgang,‘Keumgangsan yuram’ through the history. The way of sightseeing Mt. Keumgang and its meaning in the sociocultural context were discussed. The study of this kind, if concerned only a certain short period could not bear the various aspects and those cultural implication. Especially the studies on ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ in Japanese colonial periods may elude the touring activity as a passive consumption of the Japanese tourism policy. I tried to treat the ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ as a long tradition of Korean folks even those may had been biased toward higher class in the past. Korean people had traveled Mt. Keumgang as cultural deeds objectively, literatured by Hwan-rang in Sila Dynasty or Wang-geon in early Goryeo. Detail documentation could be traced back to the late Goryeo, when not only the noble class but also the folk travelled Mt. Keumgang with their family in sort of Buddhist pilgrimage. In Joseon Dynasty, it became a kind of mind training for the gentry who want pursue Confucianism, and an amusement for others. Even though ‘Yusan’ of Joseon gentry such as ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ settled down about the 17th century. Around late 17th and 18th century,Keumgangsan yuram became more popular and secular by 'Nong-yeon scholar group who considered ‘sansuyuram’ as “Heung”, fun and “Quoi”, enjoyment, and brought down the “sansu”as the object for valuation. Finally in late 19th century, even poor regional ‘yangban’ and some women tried to have sightseeing of Mt. Keumgang. In this periods ‘Keumgangsan yuram’became quite spread out even to rich middle class people in Korea. There was no more mind training or pilgrimage, but it became enjoyment and a source of pride. In Japanese periods,many of Keumgangsan tourists were told that they seemed to passively accept the Japanese colonial modern tourism policy. I assume some korean people tried to practice or follow Keumgangsan tour in the historical or traditional ‘Keumgangsan yuram’ context even under the Japanese colonial periods cause it implies lots of meaning in Korean history and culture.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 강원대 강원문화연구소, "조선시대 강원여성시문집", pp.450~ (1998), 강원도
  2. 고연희, "조선후기 산수기행예술 연구-정선과 농연 그룹을 중심으로", pp.322~ (2001), 일지사
  3. 고연희, "조선시대 산수화, 아름다운 필묵의 정신사", pp.382~ (2007), 돌베게
  4. 김기영, "금강산 기행가사 연구", pp.337~ (1998), 아세아문화사
  5. 박은순, "금강산도연구", pp.437~ (1997), 일지사
  6. 박천홍, "매혹의 질주 근대의 횡단", pp.447~ (2003), 산처럼
  7. 염은열, "19세기 금강산가사의 특징과 문화적 의미. in: 고전문학연구14집", pp.55~86 (1998), 태학사
  8. 유승훈, "근대 자료를 통해본 금강산 관광과 이미지", 실천민속학 연구, 14, pp.339~368 (2009), 실천민속학회
  9. 유승훈, "사진엽서에서 만난 관광명소", pp.172~ (2008), 부산박물관
  10. 유정선, "18·19세기 기행가사 작자층의 성격 변화 연구-<금강별곡>과 <금강산유산록>을 중심으로", 한국시가연구, 6, pp.235~261 (2000), 한국시가학회
  11. 유정선, "18·19세기 기행가사 연구", pp.310~ (2007), 도서출판 역락
  12. 유홍준, "금강산", pp.343~ (1998), 학고재
  13. 육재용, "금강산 지리산 유람록에 나타난 조선시대 관광현상 연구", 한국관광학회 2009년도 제 66차 학술연구 발표논문집, pp.496~511 (2009)
  14. 이광수, "춘원문학, 금강산유산기외", pp.418~ (1991), 성한출판사
  15. 이사벨라 버드 비숍, "한국과 그 이웃나라들", pp.603~ (1994), 살림
  16. 이재중, "조선후기 왕실·상층문화의 세속화 과정 고찰-기린 모티브를 중심으로-", 역사민속학, 11, pp.294~329 (2000), 역사민속학회
  17. 이종묵, "누워서 노니는 산수-조선시대 산수유기 걸작선", pp.230~ (2002), 태학사
  18. 이형대, "17·18세기 기행가사와 풍경의 미학", 민족문화연구, (40), pp.117~145 (2004), 민족문화연구원
  19. 이혜순, "조선 중기 유산기 연구", pp.499~ (1997), 집문당
  20. 이혜순, "18세기 한일문사의 금강산-富士山. in: 한국한문학논문선집 56 사행문학 기행문학", pp.363~381 (2002), 불함문화사
  21. 이호발, "국역 금강산탐승지", pp.256~ (2002), 보은유고연구소
  22. 장정수, "19세기 후반 금강산 기행가사의 의식세계", 어문논집, 42, pp.45~70 (2002), 안암어문학회
  23. 정치영, "‘金剛山遊山記’를 통해 본 조선시대 사대부들의 여행 관행", 문화역사지리, 15(3), pp.17~34 (2003), 한국문화역사지리학회
  24. 정치영, "유산기로 본 조선시대 사대부들의 여행", 경남문화연구, pp.291~305 (2006), 경남문화연구소
  25. 정치영, "조선시대 사림들의 청량산 여행. in: 옛 선비들의 청량산 유람록Ⅰ", pp.326~349 (2006), 봉화군
  26. 조규익, "금강산 기행가사의 존재양상과 의미", 한국시가연구, 12, pp.225~251 (2002), 한국시가학회
  27. 조필감, "부여의 조진사 금강산에 가다", pp.108~ (2001), 신성출판사
  28. 최강현, "미발표 금강산유산록을 살핌. in: 천봉 이능우 박사 칠순기념논총", pp.307~321 (1990), 도서출판 한일
  29. 최강현, "금강산 불국인가 선계인가", pp.229~ (1999), 신성출판사
  30. 축산, "금강산관상록", pp.417~, 영축총림통도사
  31. 한국정신문화연구원, "한국구비문학대계, 1-5, 7-9", ~ (1982)
  32. 한국정신문화연구원, "규방가사", 648~ (1979)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)