본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관광과 기생 -‘전통예술’의 성립에 관한 일 고찰-

Tour and Gisaeng -A Study on the constitution of ‘traditional art’-

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The aim of this paper is to investigate the process that korean 'traditional art' constituted as a aspect of transnational cultural flow. Especially, I try to examine how the mass-tourism boom since colonial period, intervened in that process. In that period Gisaeng became just the center of public interest according to increase of tourism development and the representative image of Chosun in the mass-tourism boom. The photos and images of Gisaeng were widely distributed by mass media. On the scene of tourism they entered as heroines of performance and entertainment. But, they were objectified all the way for men's enjoying and sexual partner, so that their art was nothing else than a mark of their commercial value. None the less the mass-tourism had an effect to constitute the field of korean art. The number of Gisaeng was increased day after day and they organized with meeting and parting. Any association set up the training program of art, and the famous singers and dancers participated in that program. The public stage became narrower for them, but they contributed diverse local sing and dance to change and recreate for the public stage. The field of korean art was constituted by them and their students Gisaeng with assistance of mass media for the first time. In 1960th, the tourism was risen to the surface of the state's important policies once again. The laws and orders were legislated for the detention of international tourists, and the traditional culture was recognized as public means for it actively. At this point the women artists appeared again on the stage for foreigner. After the Liberation Gisaeng maintained their life with the classical opera. But now they were dispatched to 'International Folk-art Festival' and world Exhibition, etc., with not classical opera but sing and dance, which they learned in the colonial period. At the same time the sing and dance were designated to the intangible cultural property, and the women artist was listed as their holder.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the process that korean 'traditional art' constituted as a aspect of transnational cultural flow. Especially, I try to examine how the mass-tourism boom since colonial period, intervened in that process. In that period Gisaeng became just the center of public interest according to increase of tourism development and the representative image of Chosun in the mass-tourism boom. The photos and images of Gisaeng were widely distributed by mass media. On the scene of tourism they entered as heroines of performance and entertainment. But, they were objectified all the way for men's enjoying and sexual partner, so that their art was nothing else than a mark of their commercial value. None the less the mass-tourism had an effect to constitute the field of korean art. The number of Gisaeng was increased day after day and they organized with meeting and parting. Any association set up the training program of art, and the famous singers and dancers participated in that program. The public stage became narrower for them, but they contributed diverse local sing and dance to change and recreate for the public stage. The field of korean art was constituted by them and their students Gisaeng with assistance of mass media for the first time. In 1960th, the tourism was risen to the surface of the state's important policies once again. The laws and orders were legislated for the detention of international tourists, and the traditional culture was recognized as public means for it actively. At this point the women artists appeared again on the stage for foreigner. After the Liberation Gisaeng maintained their life with the classical opera. But now they were dispatched to 'International Folk-art Festival' and world Exhibition, etc., with not classical opera but sing and dance, which they learned in the colonial period. At the same time the sing and dance were designated to the intangible cultural property, and the women artist was listed as their holder.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. "매일신보", ~
  2. "동아일보", ~
  3. "매일신보", ~
  4. "조선일보", ~
  5. "조선중앙일보", ~
  6. 엔싸이버 백과사전,
  7. 국립민속박물관, "엽서속의 기생읽기" (2009), 국립민속박물관
  8. 권도희, "20세기 기생의 음악사회사적 연구", 한국음악연구, (29), pp.319~344 (2001), 한국국악학회
  9. 권도희, "20세기 전반기의 민속악계 형성에 관한 음악사회사적 연구", pp.2003
  10. 권도희, "기생조직의 해체 이후 여성음악가들의 활동", 동양음악, (25), pp.147~146 (2003), 서울대학교 동양음악연구소
  11. 권은영, "여성농악단연구", 석사, pp.2003
  12. 노동은, "해방과 분리공간의 음악사 연구 2", 낭만음악 (1989)
  13. 단국대학교 공연예술연구소, "근대한국공연예술사 자료집 1" (1984), 단국대출판부
  14. 達觀生, "연극장 주인에게", 서북학회월보, (16) (1909)
  15. 문화공보부, "문화공보부 30년" (1979), 문화공보부
  16. 서기재, "관광의 역사와 한국 근대 관광의 발견", 한국일본어문학회 2008년 춘계학술대회 프로시딩, pp.161~164 (2008), 한국일본어문학회
  17. 서기재, "기이한 세계로의 초대 -근대 <여행안내서>를 통하여 본 금강산-", 日本語文學, (40), pp.227~252 (2009), 한국일본어문학회
  18. 서기재, "일본근대 「여행안내서」를 통해서 본 조선과 조선관광", 日本語文學, (13), pp.423~440 (2002), 한국일본어문학회
  19. 서지영, "식민지 시대 기생 연구(I): 기생집단의 근대적 재편 양상을 중심으로", 정신문화연구, 28(2), pp.267~294 (2005), 한국학중앙연구원
  20. 성기숙, "한국 전통춤 연구" (1999), 현대미학사
  21. 송방송, "한성기생조합소의 예술사회사적 조명", 한국학보, (113), pp.2~55 (2003), 일지사
  22. 송방송, "협률사와 원각사에서의 공연양상", 한국전통음악회, (5), pp.9~38 (2004)
  23. 신경숙, "19세기 일급 예기(藝기)의 삶과 섹슈얼리티 - 의녀(醫女) 옥소선(玉簫仙)을 중심으로", 한국사회사학회논문집(1-50), (65), pp.41~73 (2004), 한국사회사학회
  24. 야마시다영애, "식민지 지배와 공창 제도의 전개, 사회와 역사", 한국사회사학회, pp.143~181 (1997)
  25. 요시미 순야, "박람회-근대의 시선" (2004), 논형
  26. 유승훈, "일제시기 투어리즘이 관광산 관광의 근대적 창출 in: 사진엽서에서 만난 관광명소" (2009), 부산박물관
  27. 이경민, "경성, 사진에 박히다-사진으로 읽는 한국 근대 문화사" (2008), 산책자
  28. 이경민, "기생은 어떻게 만들어졌는가" (2006), 아카이브북스
  29. 이능화, "조선해어화사" (1999), 민속원
  30. 이주희, "동래권번에 관한 연구 - 학습내용과 기생의 활동 중심으로 -", 무용예술학연구, 24(24), pp.155~180 (2008), 한국무용예술학회
  31. 인태정, "세계체계이론을 통한 한국 근대 국민관광의 형성과정에 관한 연구: 1961-1979시기의 국가정책을 중심으로", 관광·레저연구, 18(4)통권 : 37, pp.173~189 (2006), 한국관광.레저학회
  32. 인태정, "관광의 사회학" (2007), 한울
  33. 정노식, "조선창극사" (1940), 조선일보출판부
  34. 정수진, "무형문화재의 탄생" (2008), 역사비평사
  35. 조선연구회, "조선미인보감" (2007), 민속원
  36. 최석영, "식민지 시대 ‘고족보존회’와 지방의 관광화", 아시아문화, (18), pp.111~121 (2002), 한림대아시아문화연구소
  37. 최석영, "일제 식민지 상황에서의 부여(扶餘) 고적에 대한 재해석과 '관광명소'화", 비교문화연구, 9(2), pp.109~137 (2003), 비교문화연구소
  38. 최석영, "한국 근대의 박람회·박물관" (2001), 서경문화사
  39. 태극학회, "박람회내 한국부인의 사건", 태극학보, (11) (1907)
  40. 한경수, "개화기 서구인의 조선여행", 관광학연구, 26(3)통권 : 40, pp.233~253 (2002), 한국관광학회
  41. Bishop, I. G, "조선과 그 이웃나라들" (2000), 집문당
  42. Hobsbawm. E, "만들어진 전통" (2006), 휴머니스트
  43. Wang, N, "관광과 근대성" (2004), 일신사
  44. Tourist in Indonesia, in International Tourism : Identity and Change, "The Ethnographer", pp.1995, Bruner, E
  45. Urry, J, "The Tourist Gaze" (2002), SAGE Publication

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)