본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Versus Rest Sestamibi Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background: It remains unclear whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is as accurate as myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi (MPI) for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of MCE with resting MPI in a head-to-head fashion. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 98 consecutive patients (mean age; 59±9 years, 68 males) who presented to the emergency department with chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial ischemia. Early MCE was performed by using continuous infusion of perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin (PESDA) during intermittent power Doppler harmonic imaging. Myocardial perfusion defects observed in at least one coronary territory were considered positive. Sestamibi was injected immediately after MCE and MPI was obtained within 6 hours of tracer injection. Results: ACS was confirmed in 67 patients. There were 32 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 35 patients with unstable angina requiring urgent revascularization. The sensitivities of MCE and MPI for the diagnosis of ACS were 72% and 61%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of ST segment change (24%, p<0.001 vs. MCE and vs. MPI) and troponin I (27%, p<0.001 vs. MCE and vs. MPI), with similar specificities of 90% to 100%. On a receiveroperating characteristics curve demonstrating diagnostic accuracy for ACS, the area under the curve of MCE was significantly larger than that of MPI (0.86 vs. 0.77, respectively; p=0.019). Conclusion: MCE and MPI overcome the low sensitivity of routine triage tests for detecting ACS, and MCE is more accurate than MPI for the diagnosis of ACS in the emergency department. KEY WORDS:Myocardial contrast echocardiography∙Myocardial perfusion imaging∙Acute coronary syndrome.

Abstract

Background: It remains unclear whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is as accurate as myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi (MPI) for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of MCE with resting MPI in a head-to-head fashion. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 98 consecutive patients (mean age; 59±9 years, 68 males) who presented to the emergency department with chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial ischemia. Early MCE was performed by using continuous infusion of perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin (PESDA) during intermittent power Doppler harmonic imaging. Myocardial perfusion defects observed in at least one coronary territory were considered positive. Sestamibi was injected immediately after MCE and MPI was obtained within 6 hours of tracer injection. Results: ACS was confirmed in 67 patients. There were 32 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 35 patients with unstable angina requiring urgent revascularization. The sensitivities of MCE and MPI for the diagnosis of ACS were 72% and 61%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of ST segment change (24%, p<0.001 vs. MCE and vs. MPI) and troponin I (27%, p<0.001 vs. MCE and vs. MPI), with similar specificities of 90% to 100%. On a receiveroperating characteristics curve demonstrating diagnostic accuracy for ACS, the area under the curve of MCE was significantly larger than that of MPI (0.86 vs. 0.77, respectively; p=0.019). Conclusion: MCE and MPI overcome the low sensitivity of routine triage tests for detecting ACS, and MCE is more accurate than MPI for the diagnosis of ACS in the emergency department. KEY WORDS:Myocardial contrast echocardiography∙Myocardial perfusion imaging∙Acute coronary syndrome.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Selker HP, "An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a report from a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group", Ann Emerg Med, 29, pp.13~87 (1997)
  2. Pope JH, "Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study", J Thromb Thrombolysis, 6, pp.63~74 (1998)
  3. Fineberg HV, "Care of patients with a low probability of acute myocardial infarction. Cost-effectiveness of alternatives to coronary-care-unit admission", N Engl J Med, 310, pp.1301~1307 (1984)
  4. Beller GA, "Radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear cardiology in Clinical Nuclear Cardiology", pp.37~81 (1995), Saunders
  5. Kontos MC, "Value of acute rest sestamibi perfusion imaging for evaluation of patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain", J Am Coll Cardiol, 30, pp.976~982 (1997)
  6. Udelson JE, "Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial", JAMA, 288, pp.2693~2700 (2002)
  7. Jeetley P, "Prognostic value of myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients presenting to hospital with acute chest pain and negative troponin", Am J Cardiol, 99, pp.1369~1373 (2007)
  8. Kaul S, "Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography", Circulation, 96, pp.785~792 (1997)
  9. Jeetley P, "Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography", J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, pp.141~145 (2006)
  10. Senior R, "Myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with medium probability of coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction: comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with 99mTc single-photon emission computed tomography", Am Heart J, 147, pp.1100~1105 (2004)
  11. Lee CW, "Effect of abciximab on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty", Am J Cardiol, 90, pp.1243~1246 (2002)
  12. Kontos MC, "Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac troponin I in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain", Circulation, 99, pp.2073~2078 (1999)
  13. Ohman EM, "Cardiac troponin T levels for risk stratification in acute myocardial ischemia. GUSTO IIA Investigators", N Engl J Med, 335, pp.1333~1341 (1996)
  14. Porter TR, "Visually discernible myocardial echocardiographic contrast after intravenous injection of sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles containing high molecular weight, less soluble gases", J Am Coll Cardiol, 25, pp.509~515 (1995)
  15. Heinle SK, "Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging", Circulation, 102, pp.55~60 (2000)
  16. Kang DH, "Efficacy of myocardial contrast echocardiography in the diagnosis", Am J Cardiol, 96, pp.1498~1502 (2005)
  17. DeLong ER, "Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach", Biometrics, 44, pp.837~845 (1988)
  18. Hilton TC, "Technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency room evaluation of chest pain", J Am Coll Cardiol, 23, pp.1016~1022 (1994)
  19. Rinkevich D, "Regional left ventricular perfusion and function in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation", Eur Heart J, 26, pp.1606~1611 (2005)
  20. Kaul S, "Incremental value of cardiac imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and without ST-segment elevation: a multicenter study", Am Heart J, 148, pp.129~136 (2004)
  21. DePuey EG, "Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact", J Nucl Med, 36, pp.952~955 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Global Hypokinesis Admitted for First-Onset Acute Heart Failure: Pilot Study김성은, 박대균, 오동진, 이준희, 한규록, 홍지연한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2014 · 제22권 제3호급성심근 경색증환자에서의 심근 관류의 평가고충원, 안신기, 이동일, 이문형, 이종두, 임세중, 장양수, 전국진, 정남식, 최동훈, 편욱범, 하종원한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2001 · 제9권 제1호Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department김경희, 나상훈, 박진식한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2017 · 제25권 제1호Role of Echocardiography in Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia at Emergency Department조경임한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2017 · 제25권 제1호The Value of Assessing Myocardial Deformation at Recovery after Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography김종진, 박창범, 박현영, 손일석, 양인호, 이정록, 이혜민, 조진만, 진은선, 황희정한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2014 · 제22권 제3호Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography For Suspected Cardiac Chest Pain김전, 강웅철, 김길현, 김남호, 김승환, 김영생, 김용철, 김장영, 김준홍, 김진미, 박은미, 박철현, 서혜선, 신영우, 신익균, 안민수, 안정아, 오석규, 유은주, 윤경호, 윤규현, 윤영진, 이상재, 이세화, 이지현, 이한철, 임세중, 정남식, 정동혜, 정욱진, 정진원, 천국진, 최경운, 최경훈, 최은영, 최종범, 추기석, 홍택종, Chad L. Carr, JAE K. OH, Kevin Wei한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2007 · 제15권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)