Validating Athletes’ Subjective Performance Scale: A Rasch Model Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to validate the athletes’ subjective performance scale (ASPS) and examine its optimal categorization measuring Korean university athletes using the Rasch model. A six-item ASPS with ten response categories was administered to 201 Korean university athletes participating in team sport events. The Rash measurement program, Winsteps (version 4.6.2.1), was used to perform Rasch analysis. The results showed that the model was a good fit for the data. The Wright-Andrich map indicated ceiling and floor effects, as ASPS items were unable to measure individuals with logits beyond 3 or below -2.5. Furthermore, the reliability of item separation and person separation demonstrated acceptable confidence. Lastly, the findings indicated that the ASPS, which utilized a 10-category rating scale, was problematic due to disordered thresholds. The exploratory analysis revealed that both six and seven-category rating scales appeared to comply with the effective classification criteria, but further research is needed for confirmatory analysis. Previous research has explored the relationships between psychometric factors and subjective performance; however, this study offers valuable insights into optimal categorization and introduces an innovative approach to measuring athletes’ subjective performance. To assess subjective sport performance satisfaction, the authors propose employing a six-category rating scale, which this study found to be reliable and valid in relation to construct.
Abstract
This study aimed to validate the athletes’ subjective performance scale (ASPS) and examine its optimal categorization measuring Korean university athletes using the Rasch model. A six-item ASPS with ten response categories was administered to 201 Korean university athletes participating in team sport events. The Rash measurement program, Winsteps (version 4.6.2.1), was used to perform Rasch analysis. The results showed that the model was a good fit for the data. The Wright-Andrich map indicated ceiling and floor effects, as ASPS items were unable to measure individuals with logits beyond 3 or below -2.5. Furthermore, the reliability of item separation and person separation demonstrated acceptable confidence. Lastly, the findings indicated that the ASPS, which utilized a 10-category rating scale, was problematic due to disordered thresholds. The exploratory analysis revealed that both six and seven-category rating scales appeared to comply with the effective classification criteria, but further research is needed for confirmatory analysis. Previous research has explored the relationships between psychometric factors and subjective performance; however, this study offers valuable insights into optimal categorization and introduces an innovative approach to measuring athletes’ subjective performance. To assess subjective sport performance satisfaction, the authors propose employing a six-category rating scale, which this study found to be reliable and valid in relation to construct.
참고문헌 (40)
- Akbar, M., "Impact of sports anxiety and sports imagery on performance among athletes", Journal of Education and Social Studies, 3(2), pp.137~142 (2022)
- Aryadoust, V., "Quantitative data analysis for language assessment volume I:Fundamental techniques" (2019), Routledge
- Aughey, R. J., "Applications of GPS technologies to field sports", International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 6(3), pp.295~310 (2011)
- Balaguer, I., "Situational and dispositional goals as predictors of perceptions of individual and team improvement, satisfaction and coach ratings among elite female handball teams", Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(4), pp.293~308 (2002)
- Blecharz, J., "Intrinsic motivation predicting performance satisfaction in athletes : Further psychometric evaluations of the sport motivation scale-6", Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), pp.309~319 (2015)
- Bond, T. G., "Applying the Rash Model: Fundamental in the human sciences" (2015), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Bond, T., "Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences" (2020), Routledge
- Brislin, R. W., "Back-translation for cross-cultural research", Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), pp.185~216 (1970)
- Bukhari, F. K., "Impact of sports anxiety on sports performance of players", Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(3), pp.581~586 (2021)
- Cardinale, M., "Wearable training-monitoring technology: Applications, challenges, and opportunities", International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(s2), pp.S2-55-62~ (2017)
- Christensen, K. B., "Critical values for Yen’s Q 3 : Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations", Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), pp.178~194 (2017)
- De Fazio, R., "Wearable sensors and smart devices to monitor rehabilitation parameters and sports performance : An overview", Sensors, 23(4), pp.1856~ (2023)
- 엄한주, "축구기술에 대한 객관적 측정자료와 주관적 평가자료의 비교", 체육과학연구, 13(2), pp.1~17 (2002), 국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠정책과학원
- Fisher, W. P., "Reliability statistics", Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), pp.238~ (1992)
- A hierarchical approach to performance analysis, "Franks, I. M.", Science Periodical on Research and Technology in Sport, 4~, pp.GY-1 (1984)
- Jones, P. S., "An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research", Nursing Research, 50(5), pp.300~304 (2001)
- Kang, M., "Applying the Rasch model to sport management research: The case of the psychological capital questionnaire for sport employees", International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 21(3-4), pp.172~189 (2021)
- Kang, M., "Exercise barrier severity and perseverance of active youth with physical disabilities", Rehabilitation Psychology, 52(2), pp.170~ (2007)
- Kang, S., "Fairness of the college entrance performance assessment in physical education and dance departments", The Korean Journal of Education, 40(1), pp.614~629 (2001)
- Kim, H. S., "Rasch calibration and optimal categorization of the sport fandom questionnaire", International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 23(1), pp.75~92 (2022)
- Linacre, J. M., "Investigating rating scale category utility", Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), pp.103~122 (1999)
- Linacre, J. M., "Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness", Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), pp.85~106 (2002)
- Linacre, J. M., "What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean", Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), pp.878~ (2002)
- Linacre, J. M., "Rasch model estimation : Further topics", Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(1), pp.95~110 (2004)
- Nahum, O, "Key resources & engagement among professional athletes", Doctor, pp.2019
- "Athlete’s Subjective Performance Scale (ASPS)" (2016)[URL]
- Nicholls, A. R., "A path analysis of stress appraisals, emotions, coping, and performance satisfaction among athletes", Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3), pp.263~270 (2012)
- Nisbett, R. E., "Culture and point of view", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), pp.11163~11170 (2003)
- Pensgaard, A. M., "Sydney 2000 : The interplay between emotions, coping, and the performance of Olympic-level athletes", The Sport Psychologist, 17(3), pp.253~267 (2003)
- Pensgaard, A. M., "Stress, control, and coping in elite athletes", Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 8(3), pp.183~189 (1998)
- Petrillo, J., "Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures : A comparison of worked examples", Value in Health, 18(1), pp.25~34 (2015)
- Rasch, G., "Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests", Danish Institute for Educational Research, ~ (1960)
- Saw, A. E., "Monitoring the athlete training response : Subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures : A systematic review", British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), pp.281~291 (2016)
- Terry, P., "The efficacy of mood state profiling with elite performers : A review and synthesis", The Sport Psychologist, 9(3), pp.309~324 (1995)
- Wright, B. D., "Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70(12), pp.857~860 (1989)
- Wright, B. D., "Rating scale analysis" (1982), MESA Press
- Zhu, W., "Should total scores from a rating scale be used directly?", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(3), pp.363~372 (1996)
- Zhu, W., "Cross-cultural stability of the optimal categorization of a self-efficacy scale : A Rasch analysis", Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2(4), pp.225~241 (1998)
- Zhu, W., "Rasch calibration and optimal categorization of an instrument measuring women's exercise perseverance and barriers", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72(2), pp.104~116 (2001)