탐험학습 및 활용학습과 조직성과의 관계
The Relationships Between the Exploration Learning and the Exploitation Learning and Organizational Performance
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
조직구성원의 학습을 통한 고용능력 제고 및 생산성 향상이 중소기업의 경쟁력 강화 측면에서 강조되고 있는 현실에서 탐험 및 활용학습 연구는 중소기업의 학습전략 추진에 큰 의의를 갖는다. 본 연구는 탐험학습 및 활용학습의 관계, 탐험학습 및 활용학습과 조직성과의 관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 탐험학습과 활용학습은 상호 보완적 성격을 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 탐험학습과 활용학습이 조직에서 동시에 활성화될 수 있음을 의미한다. 탐험학습과 활용학습을 동시에 추구하는 조직이 하나의 학습전략에 집중하는 기업보다 높은 조직성과를 가질 것으로 예측되었지만 실증분석 결과 예측과는 달리 조직경쟁력 강화에는 탐험학습이, 인당 매출액 증가에는 활용학습이 각각 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 탐험학습과 활용학습은 모두 조직성과와 역U자형의 관계를 갖기보다는 선형관계를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 결과가 중소기업 학습에 미치는 의미와 시사점을 논의하였다.
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between exploration learning and exploitation learning and firm performance and the interaction effects of the two learning strategies. Empirical results from a sample of small-medium size firms(SMEs) are as follows. First, the exploration and the exploitation learning are complementary constructs. Second, the relationships between both learning and organizational performance are not invert U shape style. The relationship between the exploration learning and the competitiveness of organization is linear and positive. The relationship between the exploitative learning and sales volume per man is nonlinear and U shape style, indicating that the exploitative learning is negative effect on the firm performance when it performs insufficiently, but positive effect when it performs sufficiently. Finally, the moderating effects of the exploration and exploitative learning on performance is not supported. This result means that the ambidextrous organization is not superior in their performance than the organization concentrating on only one type of learning in Korean SMEs.
참고문헌 (25)
- 이정열, "탐색과 개발적 조직학습을 통한 지식축적이 중국자회사 성과에 미치는 영향", 한국조직학회보, 5(1), pp.55~81 (2008), 한국조직학회
- Baum, J. A. C., "Making the next move : How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions", Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, pp.766~801 (2000)
- Benner, M. J., "Process management and technological innovation: a longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries", Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, pp.676~706 (2002)
- Bierly III, P. E., "Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1, pp.2) (2007), 493~516
- Burgelman, R. A., "Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in", Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, pp.325~357 (2002)
- Chandler, G. N., "Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategy and venture performance", Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), pp.331~349 (1994)
- correlation analysis for behavioral sciences(2nd ed.), "Applied multivariate regression", pp.1983, Cohen, J.
- Damanpour, F., "Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators", Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp.555~590 (1991)
- Damanpour, F., "Organizational complexity and innovation : developing and testing multiple contingency models", Management Science, 42(5), pp.693~716 (1996)
- Grant, R. M., "Prospering in dynamically-competitive environment: organizational capability as knowledge integration", Organization Science, 7(4), pp.357~387 (1996)
- He, Z. H., "Exploration vs.exploitation : an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis", Organization Science, 15(4), pp.481~494 (2004)
- Helfat, C., "Producr sequencing : Co-evoluyion of knowledge, capabilities and products", Strategic Managemenrt Journal, 21, pp.961~979 (2000)
- Hitt, M. A., "Mergers and scquisitions and managerial commitment to innovation in M-form firms", Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp.29~47 (1990)
- Katila, R., "Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction", Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp.1183~1194 (2002)
- Kimberly, J. R., "Oranizational innovtion : The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations", Academy of Management Journal, 24, pp.689~713 (1981)
- Knott, A. M., "Exploration and exploitation as complements, In The Strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Levinthal, D., "The myopia of learning", Strategic Management Journal, 14(Winter), pp.95~112 (1993)
- March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning", Organization Science, 2, pp.71~87 (1991)
- Rothaermel, F. T., "Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology : A system of new product development", Strategic Management Journal, 25, pp.201~221 (2004)
- Schildt, H. A., "Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures", Enterpreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), pp.493~515 (2005)
- Sorenson, J. B., "Aging, obsolescenc, and organizational innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, pp.81~112 (2000)
- Teece, D. J., "Profiting from technological innovation : implications for integration, collaboration, licencing and public policy", Research Policy, 15, pp.285~305 (1986)
- Tushman, M. L., "Technological discontinuities and organizational environments", Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp.431~465 (1986)
- Tushman, M. L., "The ambidexterous organization: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change", California Management Review, 38(4), pp.8~30 (1996)
- Volberda, H. W., "Toward the flexible form : how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments", Organization Science, 7, pp.359~374 (1996)