본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

역사주체의 새로운 발견과 역사인식 — ‘과격파’의 표상을 중심으로 —

Fresh Discovery of the Historical Subject and the Historical Perception - Reviewing the Concept of the Radicals in the 1920s -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In the 1920s, the colonial Korea moved toward a ideological turning point called the Era of Ideological Reconstruction. Despite several restrictions, the socialist ideas were introduced through various media, and the socialist discourse competed with the nationalist one. As the socialist groups came active in legal and illegal spheres, the national liberation movement pursued a new direction. In this process, the forces of the national liberation movement reconceptualized the nation and discovered the fresh concept of the class. Thus, in the early 1920s, the intellectuals and thought circles were drawn into turmoils, and thus, passed through a very confusing phase, which was typical in an era when new ideas were introduced. This essay pursues the process in which the conceptual frame of the class took roots in the historical perception of intellectuals in the transformative ear of the early 1920s. It also visualizes the various intellectual phenomena in the course of the materialist conception of history taking roots. By analyzing the discourse hegemony of the concept of the radicals, which was the direct translation of the Bolsheviks, this essay shows one aspect of the ideological circles. And also by analyzing the attitudes of receiving the concept of the radicals, it explains the socialists' understanding of the world history. To survey the perceptional terrain over the radicals is one way of understanding the trends in ideological circles. The differences in perceiving the concept of the radical came to be the historical origin of the anti-communism, and led to the later differentiation between the socialism and the nationalism, and between the socialism and the anarchism. As time passed, the term radicals changed into Bolsheviks, but the image of the radicals persisted long. As the 5th Congress of the Communist International adopted the policy of Bolshevization and the communist movement of the colonial Korea in 1930s followed the direction, the meaning of the Bolshevization became the key issue of the period again.

Abstract

In the 1920s, the colonial Korea moved toward a ideological turning point called the Era of Ideological Reconstruction. Despite several restrictions, the socialist ideas were introduced through various media, and the socialist discourse competed with the nationalist one. As the socialist groups came active in legal and illegal spheres, the national liberation movement pursued a new direction. In this process, the forces of the national liberation movement reconceptualized the nation and discovered the fresh concept of the class. Thus, in the early 1920s, the intellectuals and thought circles were drawn into turmoils, and thus, passed through a very confusing phase, which was typical in an era when new ideas were introduced. This essay pursues the process in which the conceptual frame of the class took roots in the historical perception of intellectuals in the transformative ear of the early 1920s. It also visualizes the various intellectual phenomena in the course of the materialist conception of history taking roots. By analyzing the discourse hegemony of the concept of the radicals, which was the direct translation of the Bolsheviks, this essay shows one aspect of the ideological circles. And also by analyzing the attitudes of receiving the concept of the radicals, it explains the socialists' understanding of the world history. To survey the perceptional terrain over the radicals is one way of understanding the trends in ideological circles. The differences in perceiving the concept of the radical came to be the historical origin of the anti-communism, and led to the later differentiation between the socialism and the nationalism, and between the socialism and the anarchism. As time passed, the term radicals changed into Bolsheviks, but the image of the radicals persisted long. As the 5th Congress of the Communist International adopted the policy of Bolshevization and the communist movement of the colonial Korea in 1930s followed the direction, the meaning of the Bolshevization became the key issue of the period again.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "독립신문", ~
  2. "매일신보", ~
  3. "동아일보", ~
  4. "조선일보", ~
  5. "서광", ~
  6. "공제", ~
  7. "아성", ~
  8. "대중시보", ~
  9. "개벽", ~
  10. "별건곤", ~
  11. 김경일, "노동" (2014), 도서출판 소화
  12. 박은식, "한국독립운동지혈사" (2008), 소명출판사
  13. 박찬승, "한국근대정치사상사연구" (1992), 역사비평사
  14. 상허학회, "근대지식으로서의 사회주의" (2008), 깊은샘
  15. 이호룡, "한국의 아나키즘―사상편―" (2001), 지식산업사
  16. 임경석, "한국 사회주의의 기원" (2003), 역사비평사
  17. 전명혁, "1920년대 한국사회주의운동 연구" (2006), 선인
  18. 김권정, "1920년대 전반 기독교 민족운동세력의 동향과 성격", 숭실사학, 14 (2001)
  19. 김현주, "근대지식으로서의 사회주의" (2008), 깊은샘
  20. 김현주, "1920년대 전반기 사회주의 문화담론의 수사학 ―사회주의는 사회비평을 어떻게 변화시켰는가?", 대동문화연구, (64), pp.7~39 (2008), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  21. 김형국, "1919~1921년 한국 지식인들의 ‘改造論’에 대한 인식과 수용에 대하여", 忠南史學, 11 (1999)
  22. 노치준, "일제하 한국 YMCA의 기독교 사회주의 사상 연구", 사회와 역사, 7 (1987)
  23. 류시현, "최남선의 '근대' 인식과 '조선학' 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.2005
  24. 박종린, "日帝下 社會主義思想의 受容에 關한 硏究", 박사, 사학, pp.2007
  25. 박헌호, "근대지식으로서의 사회주의" (2008), 깊은샘
  26. 유선영, "식민지의 ‘문화’주의, 變容과 事後", 대동문화연구, (86), pp.365~408 (2014), 대동문화연구원
  27. 이기훈, "일제하 청년담론 연구", 박사, 국사학, pp.2005
  28. 이지원, "일제하 민족문화 인식의 전개와 민족문화운동 : 민족주의 계열을 중심으로", 박사, 역사, pp.2004
  29. 임경석, "20세기 초 국제질서의 재편과 한국 신지식층의 대응 ― 사회주의 지식인의 형성 과정을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 43, pp.1~25 (2003), 대동문화연구원
  30. 임경석, "제국의 권력과 식민의 지식" (2015), 선인
  31. 장문석, "전통지식과 사회주의의 접변― 염상섭의 「현대인과 문학」에 관한 몇 개의 주석", 대동문화연구, (82), pp.131~174 (2013), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  32. 장인성, "3·1운동의 정치사상에 나타난 ‘정의’와 ‘평화’", 대동문화연구, (67), pp.435~477 (2009), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  33. 천정환, "1920년대 讀書會와 ‘社會主義 文化’", 대동문화연구, (64), pp.41~70 (2008), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  34. 하승우, "항일운동에서 ‘구성된’ 아나코-코뮨주의와 아나키즘 해석경향에 대한 재고찰 : 크로포트킨의 사상을 중심으로", 한국동양정치사상사연구, 7(1), pp.5~25 (2008), 한국동양정치사상사학회
  35. 허수, "제1차 세계대전 종전 후 개조론의 확산과 한국 지식인", 한국근현대사연구, (50), pp.37~54 (2009), 한국근현대사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)