Comparative Study of Neighborhood Community Reconstruction in Seoul and Beijing: An Action-Theoretical Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper compares the Seongmisan community in Seoul and the Qinghe Y community in Beijing from an action-theoretical perspective. For this, we distinguish leaders and residents as two actor groups, and consider how they become engaged in neighborhood community reconstruction in terms of push and pull factors. Push refers to “because of” forces such as frustration and anxiety, whereas pull refers to “in order to” forces like ideology and dreams for a better life. The most important finding of this study is that the path-dependent development of community reconstruction in Seoul and Beijing can be explained by the role of leadership and the interaction between leaders and residents. Seongmisan community has been led by a distinctive group from the “386 generation” who are deeply engaged in people-oriented activities. In contrast, the Qinghe Y community has been led by a group of expert sociologists from Tsinghua University. This paper also shows what concrete outcomes have been produced through community reconstruction in each case, and how the leading group and community residents have interacted to bring about change. Based on analysis of these findings, the two cases are compared with respect to their relative strengths and weaknesses. In this paper we also assess the significance of the comparative case study methodology as adopted for this study.
Abstract
This paper compares the Seongmisan community in Seoul and the Qinghe Y community in Beijing from an action-theoretical perspective. For this, we distinguish leaders and residents as two actor groups, and consider how they become engaged in neighborhood community reconstruction in terms of push and pull factors. Push refers to “because of” forces such as frustration and anxiety, whereas pull refers to “in order to” forces like ideology and dreams for a better life. The most important finding of this study is that the path-dependent development of community reconstruction in Seoul and Beijing can be explained by the role of leadership and the interaction between leaders and residents. Seongmisan community has been led by a distinctive group from the “386 generation” who are deeply engaged in people-oriented activities. In contrast, the Qinghe Y community has been led by a group of expert sociologists from Tsinghua University. This paper also shows what concrete outcomes have been produced through community reconstruction in each case, and how the leading group and community residents have interacted to bring about change. Based on analysis of these findings, the two cases are compared with respect to their relative strengths and weaknesses. In this paper we also assess the significance of the comparative case study methodology as adopted for this study.
참고문헌 (41)
- 안재흥, "비교방법의 방법론적 정체성", 국제정치논총, 46(2), pp.31~56 (2006), 한국국제정치학회
- Burawoy, Michael., "For a Public Socioogy", American Sociological Review, 70(1), pp.4~28 (2005)
- Burawoy, Michael, "Whither Chinese Sociology?: An Interview with Liping Sun", Global Dialogue, 2(4) (2012)
- "Differentiation of Those Friendly with Roh: Looking at the Results Analysis of the Seoul National Univerisy Graduates of the 1980s" (2017)[URL]
- "Seoul, Life, and People: White Paper on the Neighborhood Communities of Seoul" (2013)[URL]
- Engeli, Isabelle, "Comparative Policy Studies: Conceptual and Methodological Challenge" (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
- Faure, Andrew Murray, "Some Methodological Problems in Comparative Politics", Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(3), pp.307~322 (1994)
- George, Alexander L., "Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences" (2005), MIT Press
- Han, Sang-Jin, "Searching for a Theory of Middling Grassroots" (1991), Munjisa
- Han, Sang-Jin, "The Korean Path to Modernization and Risk Society", Korea Journal, 38(1), pp.5~27 (1998)
- Han, Sang-Jin, "386 Generation: Its Brightness and Dark Side" (2003), Munhaksasang
- Han, Sang-Jin, "Middle Grassroots Theory and Korean Society" (2015), Joongmin Publishers. E-book
- 한상진, "Global Risks and Cosmopolitan Citizens in East Asia: A Look at the Fukushima Disaster and Nuclear Power Plant", Journal of Asian Sociology, 46(2), pp.195~225 (2017), 사회발전연구소[DOI]
- Han, Sang-Jin, "Beyond Risk Society: Ulrich Beck and the Korean Debate" (2017), Seoul National University Press
- Han, Sang-Jin, "The College Students of the 1980s as Distinctive Joongmin in Korea", Paper presented at the 14th Joongmin Forum (2017)
- 한상진, "The Historical Context of Social Governance Experiments in East Asia: The Challenges of Risk Society", Korea Journal, 58(1), pp.12~40 (2018), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- Individualization and Community Reconstruction, "Korea Journal", 2018, 5~11, pp.한국학중앙연구원, 10.25024[DOI]
- Typology and Characteristics of Social Governance in China, "Han, Sang-Jin", Seoul Institute, ~, pp.2016-cr-22 (2017)
- Jang, Jing, "Conditions of Social Governance, Where Are the Dangers of Chinese Social Governance?", China Brief, 3(4), pp.110~117 (2015)
- "Where Are the SNU 80’s Graduates Now. . . . The More Active in Political Activity, the Less Active in Service Activities" (2017)[URL]
- Lachappelle, Francois, "The Genesis of a Chinese Public Sociologist", Global Dialogue, 6(2) (2016)
- Landman, Todd, "Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics" (2000), Routledge
- "Seongmisan Maeul of Seoul Is an Evidence of a “Real Utopia”" (2014)[URL]
- Li, Qiang, "Social Governance and Qinghe Experiment", Journal of Chinese Governance, 1, pp.139~156 (2016)
- Liu, JiaYan, "Practice and Reflection of Participatory Community Planning under the Background of Transformation:A Case Study of Y Community, Qinghe District in Beijing", Shanghai City Development Plan, 2, pp.23~28 (2017)
- Merle. Aurore, "The Role of the Sociologist"
- Mill, John Stuart, "A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive" (1843), John W. Parker
- Przeworski, Adam, "Capitalism and Social Democracy", pp.47~63 (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Przeworski, Adam, "Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Przeworski, Adam, "The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry" (1970), John Wiley
- Rihoux, Benoit, "Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide" (2006), Springer
- Shen, Yuan, "Two Pathways for Sociological Intervention", Current Sociology, 56(3), pp.399~404 (2008)
- Shim, Young-Hee, "Individualization Reconsidered from the Experience of Social Governance in Seoul, Beijing and Tokyo, In Individualization and Community Reconstruction in Seoul, Beijing, and Tokyo", Paper presented at the Kick-off Seminar of Global Research Network 2017 (2017)
- 심영희, "East Asian Patterns of Individualization and Its Consequences for Neighborhood Community Reconstruction", Korea Journal, 58(1), pp.41~69 (2018), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- Shim, Young-Hee, "‘Family-Oriented Individualization’ and Second Modernity: An Analysis of Transnational Marriages in Korea", Soziale Welt, 61(3, pp.4) (2010), 61~63
- Shim, Young-Hee, "Theories about and Strategies against Hegemonic Social Sciences" (2013), Seijo University Center for Glocal Studies
- "Decision of the CCCPC on Some Major Issues concerning Comprehensively Deepening the Reform" (2013)[URL]
- Wui, Seong-Nam, "Democratic Decision Making and Communication", pp.33~60 (2011), Korea Democracy Foundation
- Wui, Seong-Nam, "History and Thoughts of Seongmisan Community Village" (2013), Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements
- Yan, Ming, "Achievement and Challenges in the Development of Sociology in China: A Historical Perspective", Paper presented at a special lecture at Peking University (2006)
- Yoo, Chang-Bok, "We Play in the Community Village" (2010), Ttohana-ui munhwa