본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국의 장성공정

A Project to Extend the Great Wall of China

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타사회과학

초록

In China, the Great Wall is a symbol which represents the country. Its origin goes back to the warring states period when each country constructed the wall to protect its territory. While China went through many Dynasties of Qin, Han, Sui, Tang, and Ming, the wall had continually been changed and maintained. Today it is designated as a UNESCO World Heritage and become a symbolic remain of China as well as a tourist attraction. The established theory of former researchers was that the Great Wall started from its west part, Jiayuguan and ended in its east part, Shanhaiguan. Since the Great Wall project has started in 2005, Chinese government, however, announced around 2008 that the east end is the Yalu River, not the Shanhaiguan. Therefore, the wall became longer. Again in 2012, they made a public statement that remains of the Great Wall were found in Kirin, Heilong Jiang, and Xingang, making its whole length 21,000km. Now that the geographical range of the wall included Manchuria and Xingang, their histories are also confined in the wall. What would happen if the east starting point of the Great Wall was connected to Amnokgang and became longer? Not only dynasties which grew from Manchuria will be understood as local governments of China, but also Gojoseon, Buyeo, Goguryeo, Balhae will remain as its mere regions which had no national identity. That is to say, they were not independent nations, but regions which a government official appointed by the Chinese emperor had dispatched. Furthermore, Manchuria will be included traditionally in historical domain of China. Because its past dynasties (which insisted that Han Dynasty constituted four districts, Tang Dynasty overthrew Goguryeo, Balhae was established by the Mohe, Nuzhen was conquered by Ming Dynasty, and the Qing Dynasty installed Liutiaobian(柳條邊) occupied Manchuria, the history of Manchuria will be that of China. At the hidden side of extending the Great Wall, there is an intention to change the history of Manchuria into that of China. In order to rectify China's distortion of the Great Wall, hegemonism, historical misinterpretation about territory, we should understand the Great Wall above all. Chinese government is hiding its purposes which make Goguryeo and Balhae into local governments of China, fixation of border theory of Amnokgang and Dumangang, and checking North and South Korea while extending the Great Wall. We should research Manchuria from this critical direction to resolve these problems. First of all, we have to newly interpret Chinese territorial problems through investigating things as follows: a concept of the Great Wall, characters of Jiehao(界壕) during Liao and Jin Dynasty and Liaodong Defense Line in Ming dynasty, a possibility of Liutiaobian(柳條邊) which installed during Qing Dynasty and can be a part of the Great Wall, a premodern theory of border, a frontier between Joseon Dynasty and Ming-Qing Dynasty. If we solve the Chinese controversy of its territory based on our awareness of this problem, the Great Wall physically end in Shanhaiguan in a same way China insisted. We can reveal the truth that the frontier between Joseon Dynasty and China once cannot lie on Amnokgang and Dumangang, also Hushan(虎山) cannot be the eastern end point of the Great Wall. Furthermore, the history of Manchuria cannot be included as that of a local government of China.

Abstract

In China, the Great Wall is a symbol which represents the country. Its origin goes back to the warring states period when each country constructed the wall to protect its territory. While China went through many Dynasties of Qin, Han, Sui, Tang, and Ming, the wall had continually been changed and maintained. Today it is designated as a UNESCO World Heritage and become a symbolic remain of China as well as a tourist attraction. The established theory of former researchers was that the Great Wall started from its west part, Jiayuguan and ended in its east part, Shanhaiguan. Since the Great Wall project has started in 2005, Chinese government, however, announced around 2008 that the east end is the Yalu River, not the Shanhaiguan. Therefore, the wall became longer. Again in 2012, they made a public statement that remains of the Great Wall were found in Kirin, Heilong Jiang, and Xingang, making its whole length 21,000km. Now that the geographical range of the wall included Manchuria and Xingang, their histories are also confined in the wall. What would happen if the east starting point of the Great Wall was connected to Amnokgang and became longer? Not only dynasties which grew from Manchuria will be understood as local governments of China, but also Gojoseon, Buyeo, Goguryeo, Balhae will remain as its mere regions which had no national identity. That is to say, they were not independent nations, but regions which a government official appointed by the Chinese emperor had dispatched. Furthermore, Manchuria will be included traditionally in historical domain of China. Because its past dynasties (which insisted that Han Dynasty constituted four districts, Tang Dynasty overthrew Goguryeo, Balhae was established by the Mohe, Nuzhen was conquered by Ming Dynasty, and the Qing Dynasty installed Liutiaobian(柳條邊) occupied Manchuria, the history of Manchuria will be that of China. At the hidden side of extending the Great Wall, there is an intention to change the history of Manchuria into that of China. In order to rectify China's distortion of the Great Wall, hegemonism, historical misinterpretation about territory, we should understand the Great Wall above all. Chinese government is hiding its purposes which make Goguryeo and Balhae into local governments of China, fixation of border theory of Amnokgang and Dumangang, and checking North and South Korea while extending the Great Wall. We should research Manchuria from this critical direction to resolve these problems. First of all, we have to newly interpret Chinese territorial problems through investigating things as follows: a concept of the Great Wall, characters of Jiehao(界壕) during Liao and Jin Dynasty and Liaodong Defense Line in Ming dynasty, a possibility of Liutiaobian(柳條邊) which installed during Qing Dynasty and can be a part of the Great Wall, a premodern theory of border, a frontier between Joseon Dynasty and Ming-Qing Dynasty. If we solve the Chinese controversy of its territory based on our awareness of this problem, the Great Wall physically end in Shanhaiguan in a same way China insisted. We can reveal the truth that the frontier between Joseon Dynasty and China once cannot lie on Amnokgang and Dumangang, also Hushan(虎山) cannot be the eastern end point of the Great Wall. Furthermore, the history of Manchuria cannot be included as that of a local government of China.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "奉天通志", ~
  2. 彭勇, "明代北邊防禦體制" (2009), 中央民族大學
  3. 魏志江, "韓國關系史硏究" (2006), 中山大學出版社
  4. 周遠廉, "淸朝關國史硏究. 遼寧人民" (1981), 遼寧人民
  5. 林榮貴, "中國古代疆城史 上·下 4卷本" (2007), 黑龍江敎育出版社
  6. 黑龍江省哲學社會科學院第3室, "滿洲人在東北-十七世紀-" (1976), 商務印書館
  7. 劉謙, "明遼東鎭長城及防御考" (1989), 文物出版社
  8. 景愛, "中國長城史" (2006), 上海人民出版社
  9. 佟冬, "中國東北史 4" (1998), 吉林文史出版社
  10. 楊賓, "柳邊紀略(遼海叢書本)", ~
  11. 林榮貴, "中國古代疆城史 下卷" (2007), 黑龍江敎育出版社
  12. 黑龍江省哲學社會科學院第三室, "滿洲人在東北-十七世紀-" (1976), 商務印書館
  13. 南義鉉, "明代遼東支配政策硏究" (2008), 江原大學校出版部
  14. 유재춘, "長城의 中國史" (2008), 강원대학교 출판부
  15. 한성주, "조선전기 수직여진인 연구" (2011), 경인문화사
  16. 김선민, "雍正-乾隆年間 莽牛哨 事件과 淸-朝鮮 國境地帶", 중국사연구, 71(71), pp.69~97 (2011), 중국사학회
  17. 남의현, "중국의 명대 동북강역 연구성과와 문제점 분석", 인문과학연구, (22), pp.189~221 (2009), 인문과학연구소
  18. 남의현, "16~17세기 여진의 성장과 요동 변경지대 성격 연구 - 변경지대의 변화를 통해 본 만리장성 동단기점설 비판 -", 동북아역사논총, (34), pp.295~330 (2011), 동북아역사재단
  19. 남의현, "遼東都司 對外膨脹의 限界에 대한 考察 ― 山東에 대한 依存性과 對外進出의 限界性을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (27), pp.67~99 (2007), 명청사학회
  20. 손춘일, "淸初 柳條邊墙의 건축과 그 역할", 백산학보, (92), pp.231~253 (2012), 백산학회[DOI]
  21. 柳在春, "15세기 명의 동팔참 지역 점거와 조선의 대응", 조선시대사학보, 18 (2001), 조선시대사학회
  22. 정병진, "入關前 淸의 朝鮮에 대한 ‘三色人’ 刷還要求", 명청사연구, (37), pp.33~65 (2012), 명청사학회[DOI]
  23. 정혜중, "光緖年間 동북관리와 1907년 동삼성 설치 - 동북 봉금지대의 내지화", 중국학보, (54), pp.379~400 (2006), 한국중국학회
  24. 한성주, "조선전기 두만강유역 ‘女眞 藩籬・藩胡’의 형성과 성격", 韓國史學報, (41), pp.163~201 (2010), 고려사학회
  25. 賈文華, "淸代封禁東北政策硏究綜術", 綏化學院學報 (2006)
  26. 馬平安, "淸未淸廷封禁政策轉變與東北地區的移民實邊", 遼寧敎育學院學報 (1991)
  27. 施立學, "東北柳條邊的封禁及對東邊道生態文化的影響", 東北史地, 3 (2007)
  28. 劉麗麗, "試論淸廷在乾隆朝以來對東北的政策", 黑江學刊 (2009)
  29. 張杰, "淸代鴨綠江流城的封禁與開發", 中國邊疆史地硏究 (1994)
  30. 張杰, "淸前期對綠江流封禁區的管轄", 中國邊疆史地硏究 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)