일본에서의 이주민 통합과 참정권
Unification of Immigrants and Franchise : Case of Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although there are lots of foreigners in Japan, they do not have a right to vote yet. It is true that a deep-rooted 'one ethnic myth' still exists in Japanese community. A lawsuit against political rights has been filed, mainly by Korean resident in Japan, but it was turned down all the time. Gradually, however, European judicial interpretation and conventional wisdom of immigrant franchise issue have been accepted in Japan. It might be difficult to give political rights to them in a case of national election like presidential election, but highly possible when it comes to local elections. Yet, due to the fact that conventional wisdom takes the notion of 'acceptance theory˚AE which says legal whether political rights is given to immigrant or not, current circumstance that immigrant do not have political rights is legally acceptable. The immigrant franchise issue becomes increasingly prominent as Hatoyama's Democratic Party of Japan[DPJ] takes power from nearly 50-year-governed Liberal Democratic Pary[LDP].
Abstract
Although there are lots of foreigners in Japan, they do not have a right to vote yet. It is true that a deep-rooted 'one ethnic myth' still exists in Japanese community. A lawsuit against political rights has been filed, mainly by Korean resident in Japan, but it was turned down all the time. Gradually, however, European judicial interpretation and conventional wisdom of immigrant franchise issue have been accepted in Japan. It might be difficult to give political rights to them in a case of national election like presidential election, but highly possible when it comes to local elections. Yet, due to the fact that conventional wisdom takes the notion of 'acceptance theory˚AE which says legal whether political rights is given to immigrant or not, current circumstance that immigrant do not have political rights is legally acceptable. The immigrant franchise issue becomes increasingly prominent as Hatoyama's Democratic Party of Japan[DPJ] takes power from nearly 50-year-governed Liberal Democratic Pary[LDP].
참고문헌 (25)
- 송석원, "일본의 민족질서. in : 신세기의 민족질서와 한민족" (2008), 백상재단
- 조정남, "일본의 민족정책. in : 현대일본의 정치와 사회" (2005), 매봉
- 麻野雅子, "日本における外國人政治參加の現狀 : 多文化共生を目指す自治?の取り組みを中心に. in : 外國人參政權問題の園際比較" (2006), 昭和堂
- 李英和, "在日韓國·朝鮮人と參政權" (1993), 明石書店
- 加島宏, "定住外國人の公務就任權. in : 定住外國人の地方參政權" (1992), 日本評論社
- 木村幹, "在日韓國·朝鮮人問題と外國人參政權. in : 外國人參政權問題の國際比較" (2006), 昭和堂
- 金正圭, "在日韓國·朝鮮人と地方參政植權 : 地方參政權提訴第一?の發言. in : 定住外國人の地方參政權" (1992), 日本評論社
- 金英達, "在日外國人と指紋捺印制度 : 外國人管理と指紋登錄について考える. in : 在日外國人と日本社會 : 多民族社會と國籍の問題" (1984), 社會評論社
- 駒井洋, "自治體の外?人政策" (1997), 明石書店
- 佐野哲, "外國人硏修·技能實習制度の構造と機能. in : 國際化のなかの移民政策の課題" (2002), 明石書店
- 徐龍達, "定住外國人の地方參政權. in : 定住外國人の地方參政權" (1992), 日本評論社
- デイリ?ヨミウリ, "へンな?困った?ニッポン : ドキュメント外國人" (2002), 中央公論新社
- 長尾一紘, "外國人の參政權" (2000), 世界思想社
- 地域の?際化と地域?際化協?沿革. in : 地域?際化協?のあり方に?する調査?究報告書, "田勝利", 財?法人自治??際化協, ~ (2000)
- 松田利彦, "戰前期の在日韓國·朝鮮人と參政權" (1995), 明石書店
- 宮島喬, "共に生きられる日本へ" (2003), 有斐閣
- 百地章, "氷住外國人の參政權 Q&A", ~ (2000)
- ヒッグス?アラン, "國政·地方參政權へのわたLの主張. in : 定住外國人の地方參政權" (1992), 日本評論社
- "朝日新聞", ~
- "法務省入?管理局 平成19年末現在における外國人登錄者統計について"[URL]