지식정보사회에서 문화자본으로서 브라질 제이치뉴(jeitinho)와 중국의 꽌시(關係)
Chinese Guanxi and Brazilian Jeitinho as Social Capital in Information-Knowledge Society
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文去解决,是否有可能重新评估他们在社会发展的过程中,两国在社会文化方面的正面的的中国关系巴西Jeitinho的。关系和Jeitinho的已计提的折旧时间长作为对工业化的障碍。也许真正的眼睛完全工业化的国家。不过,我相信,这两个文化符码被重新评估社会饲养和知识为基础的创意社会的新的增长引擎都有自己的优点。从早期阶段他们沙爹形成的历史,关系和Jeitinho可能起到了很大的作用,社会保障的情况下,劳动密集型农业和甘蔗种植园没有中央政府的正式规则的社会,从字面上尊重。这两个文化符码,将保持其社会保障职能,甚至在未来的后稀缺社会人为因素获得更值比稀缺社会。在稀缺的时代,消费被触发,以满足基本生存需要。但在后稀缺时代,信息和知识为基础的创意主导力量,消费将大量生产的产品不能提供的附加价值更高的要求所引发的社会。被视为巴西Jeitinho可以,在这个意义上,作为一个可能的增长引擎,巴西在未来社会生活方式的创新性和例外性的性质。这中国关系缺乏创造力。它可以是一个社会的门将,帮助社会统一和衰减类之间或人与人之间的社会紧张。
Abstract
This paper goes to tackle Chinese Gaunxi and Brazilian Jeitinho whether it is possible to re-evaluate them positive in the course of social development in two countries in the socio-cultural aspect. Guanxi and Jeitinho have been depreciated for long time as obstructors against the industrialization. It maybe true for the eyes of fully industrialized countries. However, I believe these two cultural codes have their own merits of being re-evaluated as social keepers and new growth engines in knowledge based creative society. From earlier stage of their history of sate-formation, Gaunxi and Jeitinho might have played great roles of social security under the circumstances of labor intensive agriculture and sugar plantation societies where no official rules of central governments were literally respected. These two cultural codes will keep their functions of social security even in the future post-scarcity society where human factors gains much more values than in the scarcity society. In the scarcity era, consumption was triggered to meet basic need for survival. But in the post-scarcity era, called information and knowledge based society where creativity is dominant power, consumption will be triggered by higher requirement of additional values that massively produced products cannot offer. Brazilian Jeitinho can be considered, in this sense, as a possible growth engine in future Brazilian society by its nature of innovativeness and exceptionality in lifestyle. Chinese Gaunxi lacks this creativity. It can be a social keeper helping social unification and attenuating social tension between classes or between people.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강진석, "중국의 문화코드" (2004), 살림지식총서
- 기와기타 미노루, "설탕의 세계사" (2003), 좋은책만들기
- 김영경, "중국 향진기업가의 입장에서 본 꽈ㄴ시(關係)의 기능 : 사회자본(Social capital) 이론을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2002
- 이승용, "소비가치유형에 따른 한국과 브라질 광고 비교 - 맥주광고를 중심으로", 중남미연구, 31(1), pp.95~120 (2012), 중남미연구소
- 임두빈, "제이칭뉴를 통해 본 브라질 일상문화코드" (2013), 글로벌문화콘텐츠학회
- 정보은, "현대중국 “국학열(國學熱)”의 사회체계형성으로서의 사회적 기능과 의미", 중소연구, 36(3), pp.91~129 (2012), 아태지역연구센터
- 정연식, "꽌시에 대하여", 1999년도 한국정치학회 연례학술회 (1999)
- 정하영, "중국의 '꽌시' 문화에 대한 시론", 중국학연구, (27), pp.355~ (2004), 중국학연구회
- 장영석, "鄕土中國" (2011), 비봉출판사
- Adonro, T., "계몽의 변증법" (2005), 살림
- Barbosa, L., "O jeitinho brasileiro ou a arte de ser mais igual do que os outros" (1992), Campus
- DaMatta, R., "que é o Brasil?" (2004), Rocco
- Duarte, F., "A double-edge sword: The jeitinho as an ambiguos concept in the Brazilian imaginary", Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 1, pp.125~131 (2011)
- Florida, R., "The Rise of Creative Class" (2012), Basic Books
- Frazer, J., "황금가지" (2007), 동서문화사
- Freyre, G., "The Masters and the Slaves: A study in the development of Brazilian Civilization. 2nd English-language Edition" (1956), Alfred A. Knopf
- Holanda, S., "Raízes do Brasil" (2007), Companha das Letras
- Marcus, C., "Future of Creative Industries: Implications for research policy", European Commission Foresight working document series, ~ (2005)
- Menger, P. M., "Cultural Policies in Europe: From a State to a City-Centered Perspective on Cultural Generativity" (2010), GRIPS Policy Research Center
- Rodrigues, R., "Brazilian jeitinho: Understanding and explaining an indigenous psychological construct", International journal of Psychology, 43(1), pp.29~38 (2011)
