형법상 정당방위와 자구행위의 경합
A competition of self defense and self help in the criminal law
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find out the limit of self defense and the solution of competition. It is impossible for us to admit self defense without limit in actuality of criminal law if we take adequate notice of the benefit and protection of the law, the principle of propriety, and the principle of present. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of competition of justifications and security of effectiveness about self help in the criminal law of Korea. The results show that as follow:Firstly, the question of whether or not to admit self defense, is determined by the special feature by means of advance emergency act. It is impossible to shirk one's criminal responsibility about a revenge act. Secondly, we must not only know the difference between self defense and self help in the criminal justifications, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the mutual supplementation which overcome weakness. This study shows how we will decide a standard of justifications between self defense and self help. Thirdly, we have to make full use of the self help by justification in a judicial precedent, because the self help is a fort which protect a claim, especially property right, from violation.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the limit of self defense and the solution of competition. It is impossible for us to admit self defense without limit in actuality of criminal law if we take adequate notice of the benefit and protection of the law, the principle of propriety, and the principle of present. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of competition of justifications and security of effectiveness about self help in the criminal law of Korea. The results show that as follow:Firstly, the question of whether or not to admit self defense, is determined by the special feature by means of advance emergency act. It is impossible to shirk one's criminal responsibility about a revenge act. Secondly, we must not only know the difference between self defense and self help in the criminal justifications, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the mutual supplementation which overcome weakness. This study shows how we will decide a standard of justifications between self defense and self help. Thirdly, we have to make full use of the self help by justification in a judicial precedent, because the self help is a fort which protect a claim, especially property right, from violation.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김성돈, "형법총론(제2판)", pp.269~ (2009), 성균관대학교출판부
- 김일수, "자구행위", 고시연구, 15(2), pp.137~ (1988)
- 김일수, "새로 쓴 형법총론(제11판)", pp.299~ (2008), 박영사
- 김종수, "자구행위", 법학논총, pp.34~ (1959), 단국대 법학연구소
- 박상기, "형법총론(제8판)", pp.182~ (2009), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론(제9개정판)" (2008), 홍문사
- 성낙현, "형법총론(제2판)", pp.240~ (2011), 동방문화사
- 송진경, "형법 제23조 자구행위에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 송진경, "형법 제23조 자구행위 등 위법성조각사유의 존재이유", 형사법연구, 22(2), pp.3~32 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 엄상섭, "긴급행위에 대한 시론, In 효당엄상섭 형법논집", pp.106~107 (2003), 서울대학교 출판부
- 오영근, "형법총론(제2판)", pp.366~ (2009), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법총론(제6신판)" (2010), 박영사
- 임웅, "형법총론(제3정판)", pp.224~ (2010), 법문사
- 박광민, "형법총론(제5판)", pp.232~ (2011), 삼영사
- 정영석, "자구행위 논고", 법정, 11(7)통권 : 87, pp.16~ (1956), 법정사
- 허일태, "영산홍사건(Rhododendron indicum) : 대법원 2008.10.23. 선고 2008도6080 판결", 형사법연구, 21(2), pp.275~298 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 橋爪隆, "正当防衛論の基礎", pp.107~108 (2007), 有斐閣
- 山口厚, "刑法総論(第2版)", pp.108~ (2007), 有斐閣
- Friedrich Schaffstein, "Die allgemeinen Lehren vom Verbrechen in ihrer Entwicklung durch die Wissenschaft des gemeinen Strafrechts", 76~82 (1930)
- Jescheck, "Lehrbuch des Strafrechts Allgemeiner Teil 5.Auflage", pp.327~341 (1996), Duncker ＆ Humbolt
- Friedrich-Christian Schröder, "Die Notwehr als Indikator politischer Grundanschauungen, in : Festschrift für Reinhard Maurach", pp.137~142 (1972)
- Karl Ludwig Kunz, "Die organisierte Nothilfe", ZStW, 95, pp.989~995 (1983)
- Alexander Josef Hummler, "Staatliches Gewaltmonopol und Notwehr", pp.205~ (1998), Tübingen