형법 제23조 자구행위 등 위법성조각사유의 존재이유
A Study on the Purposes of Justifications including Self-help, etc.
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The criminal law basically protects the legal interests including individual's life, body freedom and property, etc. We usually think that individual's life, body and freedom are more important than property. So the question of the criminal law supporting self-help is a trouble-solving broker's criminal law because self-help as the ex-post emergency action violates other people's life, body in order to protect one's property. In these days, a few countries have self-help as one of the justification in criminal law. However, the legislators stipulated the self-help of clause 23 in 1953 when they established the Korean Criminal Law. They intended to rule definitely on the legal principles that be received by the scholars' theories at that time. Self-help is an ex-post emergency action after the violation is completed while Self-defense is an ex-ante emergency action. The action of self-help is admitted if it is impossible to preserve a claim by legal procedure. The ex-ante emergency action including self-defense, necessity is admitted to protects every legal interest. Self-help as the ex-post emergency action is restrictively admitted to protect the recoverable right. It does not mean that admitting self-help is ignoring other's body, freedom. All of the self-dense, necessity and self-help are the admissions that a man escape the crisis by one's own power if the country is not able to help the person in an emergency. As a result, self-defense, necessity and self-help are the individual's emergency actions if the country could not help individual. These emergency actions do not mean disregard of legal process or the principle of constitutional state but individual's measure to escape crisis.
Abstract
The criminal law basically protects the legal interests including individual's life, body freedom and property, etc. We usually think that individual's life, body and freedom are more important than property. So the question of the criminal law supporting self-help is a trouble-solving broker's criminal law because self-help as the ex-post emergency action violates other people's life, body in order to protect one's property. In these days, a few countries have self-help as one of the justification in criminal law. However, the legislators stipulated the self-help of clause 23 in 1953 when they established the Korean Criminal Law. They intended to rule definitely on the legal principles that be received by the scholars' theories at that time. Self-help is an ex-post emergency action after the violation is completed while Self-defense is an ex-ante emergency action. The action of self-help is admitted if it is impossible to preserve a claim by legal procedure. The ex-ante emergency action including self-defense, necessity is admitted to protects every legal interest. Self-help as the ex-post emergency action is restrictively admitted to protect the recoverable right. It does not mean that admitting self-help is ignoring other's body, freedom. All of the self-dense, necessity and self-help are the admissions that a man escape the crisis by one's own power if the country is not able to help the person in an emergency. As a result, self-defense, necessity and self-help are the individual's emergency actions if the country could not help individual. These emergency actions do not mean disregard of legal process or the principle of constitutional state but individual's measure to escape crisis.
참고문헌 (34)
- "경찰청 통계자료실"[URL]
- 경찰청, , 경찰통계연보 2008, (52), pp.106~107 (2009)
- 김성돈, "형법총론" (2008), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김일수, "자구행위", 고시연구, 15(2) (1988)
- 김일수, "새로쓴 형법총론(제11판)" (2006), 박영사
- 김재동, "자구행위", 검찰, (23) (1970), 대검찰청
- 김종수, "자구행위", 법학논총, 2 (1959), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 문화일보, "112 신고하면 5분 25초 안에 출동, 2010년 1월 1일자 기사", ~ (2010)
- 박상기, "형법총론(제7판)" (2007), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론(제9개정판)" (2008), 홍문사
- 백형구, "자구행위", 고시계, 통권 : 391 (1989)
- 손동권, "형법총론(제2개정판)" (2006), 율곡출판사
- 손해목, "자구행위", 고시계, 통권 : 363 (1987), 고시계사
- 송진경, "형법 제23조 자구행위에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 양 건, "헌법강의" (2009), 법문사
- 엄상섭, "긴급행위에 대한 시론. in: 효당 엄상섭 형법논집" (2003), 서울대학교 출판부
- 염정철, "정당방위 -긴급행위로서의 정당방위- (1)", 법학연구, 2(1) (1957), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 염정철, "긴급피난과 자구행위 -긴급행위로서의 긴급피난과 자구행위 (2)-", 법학연구, 2(2) (1958), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 이형국, "형법총론(제4판)" (2007), 법문사
- 임 웅, "형법총론(개정판)" (2002), 법문사
- 정성근, "자구행위", 고시계, 통권 : 317 (1983)
- 정성근, "형법총론(제4판)" (2008), 삼지원
- J. Wessels, "독일형법총론" (1998), 세종출판사
- 진계호, "자구행위", 고시연구, 통권 : 223, 고시연구사
- 허 영, "한국헌법론(전정 5판)" (2009), 박영사
- 허 영, "헌법이론과 헌법(신정11판)" (2006), 박영사
- 小野村胤敏, "刑法に於ける自力救濟の硏究" (1938), 弘文堂書房
- 花井卓藏, "自救權論" (1917), 有斐閣書房
- 大塚 仁, "大コンメンタ-ル刑法 第2卷(第2版)" (2006), 靑林書院
- C. Roxin, "Strafrecht AT 1(4. Aufl.)" (2006), Beck
- Fritz Heyer, "Die Selbsthilfe nach dem bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Berlin", ~ (1901)
- Jescheck, "Lehrbuch des Strafrechts Allgemeiner Teil(5. Aufl.)" (1996), Duncker & Humblot
- "BGH: Übergesetzlicher Notstand NJW", ~ (1959)
- "BGH: Übergesetzlicher Notstand auf Grund des „Selbstbestimmungsrechts der Südtiroler” und ihres „Rechts zum Widerstand”, NJW", ~ (1966)
