영국과 한국의 건강도시 사업 평가방법 비교 연구: 리버풀과 원주시를 중심으로
A Comparative Study of Healthy City Project Evaluation in U.K. and Korea: Focusing on Liverpool City and Wonju City
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study was to compare two healthy cities, Liverpool in England and Wonju in Korea, which evaluated healthy city projectsand to reorient evaluation strategy which fits into Korean Healthy cities. Methods: Comparatives analysis was used by reviewingdocuments, healthy city plan and evaluation report, of two cities. Results: Healthy city projects in two cities, fifteen programs wereidentical items among twenty-seven but there were differences in seven items for Liverpool and five items for Wonju. In Liverpoolevaluation was done by a stakeholder group called Liverpool Local Involvement Network(LINK), while in Wonju by Yonsei HealthyCity Research Center. The evaluation tool was two types; quantitative and qualitative analysis. Liverpool mostly used qualitative and addedquantitative, vice versa in Wonju. Conclusions: Evaluation plan for Healthy city projects need to be made in the first phase of the projects,instead of in the end. Moreover, it is important to include stakeholder in conducting qualitative analysis for unquantifiable evidence ofeffectiveness, as well as quantitative analysis.
Abstract
Objectives: This study was to compare two healthy cities, Liverpool in England and Wonju in Korea, which evaluated healthy city projectsand to reorient evaluation strategy which fits into Korean Healthy cities. Methods: Comparatives analysis was used by reviewingdocuments, healthy city plan and evaluation report, of two cities. Results: Healthy city projects in two cities, fifteen programs wereidentical items among twenty-seven but there were differences in seven items for Liverpool and five items for Wonju. In Liverpoolevaluation was done by a stakeholder group called Liverpool Local Involvement Network(LINK), while in Wonju by Yonsei HealthyCity Research Center. The evaluation tool was two types; quantitative and qualitative analysis. Liverpool mostly used qualitative and addedquantitative, vice versa in Wonju. Conclusions: Evaluation plan for Healthy city projects need to be made in the first phase of the projects,instead of in the end. Moreover, it is important to include stakeholder in conducting qualitative analysis for unquantifiable evidence ofeffectiveness, as well as quantitative analysis.
참고문헌 (34)
- "Alliance for Healthy Cities"[URL]
- Barton, H., "Healthy urban planning in European cities", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.91~99 (2009)
- Burton S., "Evaluation of healthy city projects: Stakeholder analysis of tow projects in Bangladesh", Environment and Urbanization, 11(1), pp.41~52 (1999)
- Coston, C., "Joint working in the production of a city health plan : The Liverpool experience", Health Promotion International, 12, pp.9~19 (1997)
- Goumans, M., "From projects to policy : Healthy Cities’ as a mechanism for policy change for health?", Health Promotion International, 12(4), pp.311~322 (1997)
- Green, G., "City health development planning", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.72~80 (2009)
- Green, G, Price, C., "Partnership structures in the WHO European healthy cities project", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.37~44 (2009)
- Boonekamp, M. M. G., "Healthy cities evaluation: The co-ordinator perspective", Health Promotion International, 14(2), pp.103~110 (1999)
- Hall, C., "Health in the urban environment: a qualitative review of the Brighton and Hove WHO healthy city program", Journal of Urban Healthy, 87(1), pp.8~28 (2009)
- Harpham, T., "Healthy city projects in developing countries : the first evaluation", Health Promotion International, 6(2), pp.111~125 (2001)
- Iso, E., "The introduction of health impact assessment in the WHO European healthy cities networks", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.64~71 (2009)
- Kang, E. J., "Study on the health planning and public policies for creating a healthy city", Planning and Policy, 345, pp.35~42 (2010)
- 김진희, "새로운 건강정책 패러다임으로서의 건강도시 접근법", 대한의사협회지, 54(8), pp.884~891 (2011), 대한의사협회
- 김정민, "건강도시사업추진을 위한 개인, 조직, 환경역량의 평가", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 26(2), pp.121~135 (2009), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- Lafond, L. J., "National networks healthy cities in Europe", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.100~107 (2009)
- Leeuw, D. E., "Healthy cities: Urban social entrepreneurship for health", Health Promotion International, 14, pp.261~369 (1999)
- Liverpool City., "Liverpool City Health Plan" (1996), Liverpool city
- Healthy City?: Report of Liverpool, "Liverpool City", Link Healthy City Task and Finish Group, ~ (2010)
- 남은우, "(종설) 건강도시사업 추진과 정책 과제", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 24(2), pp.123~134 (2007), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- 남은우, "Evaluation of Healthy City Project Using SPIRIT Checklist: Wonju City Case", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 27(5), pp.15~25 (2010), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- O’Neill, M., "Choosing indicators to evaluate healthy cities projects : A political task?", Health Promotion International, 21, pp.145~152 (2006)
- 오유미, "대한민국 건강도시 평가(2008-2010)", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 28(3), pp.99~111 (2011), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- Park, Y. H., "Implementation strategy for evaluation and accreditation of healthy cities in Korea", Meeting on Implementation National Accreditation System for Healthy City and Technical Network (2013), Ministry of Health and Welfare, and Soonchunhyang University
- Ritsatakis, A., "Equity and social determinants of health at a city level", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.81~90 (2009)
- Strobl, J., "Achieving wider participation in strategic health planning: Experience from the consultation phase of Liverpool’s ‘City Health Plan’", Health Promotion International, 15, pp.215~225 (2000)
- Tsouros, A., "City leadership for health and sustainable development : The World Health Organization European healthy cities network", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.4~10 (2009)
- Webster, P., "Review of the ‘City Health Profile’ produced by WHO-Healthy Cities- do they present information on health and its determinants and what are their perceived benefits?", Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 33, pp.125~127 (1999)
- Webster, P., "The evolution of the WHO city health profiles: A content review", Health Promotion International, 24(1), pp.56~63 (2009)
- WHO-EURO, "Twenty steps for developing a healthy cities project" (1997), WHO Regional Office for Europe
- City health profiles: A review of progress, "WHO-EURO", ~ (1998)
- National healthy cities networks : A powerful force for health and sustainable development in Europe, "WHO-EURO", WHO Regional Office for Europe, ~ (2003)
- 5 year Plan for healthy city Wonju, "Wonju City.", Yonsei University, Wonju: Healthy City Research Center, ~ (2006)
- Development of Healthy City Wonju Vision, "Wonju City", Healthy City Research Center, ~ (2010)
- 윤태호, "계층 분석법을 적용한 부산시 건강도시 사업의 우선순위 설정", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 28(3), pp.31~42 (2011), 한국보건교육건강증진학회