1인 구조자 영아 심폐소생술 가슴압박 방법에 따른 효율성 및 편리성 비교
Comparing the efficiency and convenience of one-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation chest compression techniques for infants
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to propose an effective one-rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) chest compression technique by comparing the differences in efficacy, convenience, and pain levels between the two thumb-encircling and two finger techniques. Methods: Subjects were randomized to perform either two-thumb-encircling or two-finger technique for 8 minutes each on infant CPR manikins. After the chest compression, a survey was administered to the subjects to measure convenience and pain levels according to compression method. Results: Total compression depth over 8 minutes was significantly deeper for the two-thum- encircling technique (43.5±4.8mm) compared with the two-finger technique (32.6±5.4mm) (p<0.001). In terms of compression depth measured at 1-minute intervals, compression depth with the two-finger technique decreased from 38.3±4.23mm to 29.0±6.79mm, whereas compression depth with the two-thumb-encircling technique did not show a significant change (from 43.7±4.12mm to 43.4±5mm). The results of the survey indicated that, the majority of subjects found the two-thumb-encircling technique to be the most comfortable technique for compression depth (n=29, 64.4%). The majority of subjects (n=31, 68.9%) answered that the two-finger technique resulted in the most pain. Conclusion: Comparison of efficacy of the two-thumb-encircling and two-finger-techniques in the performance of one-rescuer infant CPR revealed that the two-thumb-encircling technique was more effective in maintaining chest compression depth.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to propose an effective one-rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) chest compression technique by comparing the differences in efficacy, convenience, and pain levels between the two thumb-encircling and two finger techniques. Methods: Subjects were randomized to perform either two-thumb-encircling or two-finger technique for 8 minutes each on infant CPR manikins. After the chest compression, a survey was administered to the subjects to measure convenience and pain levels according to compression method. Results: Total compression depth over 8 minutes was significantly deeper for the two-thum- encircling technique (43.5±4.8mm) compared with the two-finger technique (32.6±5.4mm) (p<0.001). In terms of compression depth measured at 1-minute intervals, compression depth with the two-finger technique decreased from 38.3±4.23mm to 29.0±6.79mm, whereas compression depth with the two-thumb-encircling technique did not show a significant change (from 43.7±4.12mm to 43.4±5mm). The results of the survey indicated that, the majority of subjects found the two-thumb-encircling technique to be the most comfortable technique for compression depth (n=29, 64.4%). The majority of subjects (n=31, 68.9%) answered that the two-finger technique resulted in the most pain. Conclusion: Comparison of efficacy of the two-thumb-encircling and two-finger-techniques in the performance of one-rescuer infant CPR revealed that the two-thumb-encircling technique was more effective in maintaining chest compression depth.
참고문헌 (13)
- "Annual report on the cause of death statistics" (2016)[URL]
- Ikwan Chang, "Association of dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation with survival outcomes after pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by community property value", Resuscitation, 132, pp.120~126 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Ziad Nehme, "Trends in the incidence and outcome of paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A 17-year observational study", Resuscitation, 128, pp.43~50 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- "Korean guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care" (2015)[URL]
- Dianne L. Atkins, "Part 11: Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality", Circulation, 132(18 suppl 2), pp.S519~S525 (2015), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Smereka J, "Randomized comparison of two-thumb vs. two-finger chest compression during infant resuscitation performed by paramedics", Resuscitation, 106(1), pp.e34~ (2017)[DOI]
- International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, "The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Neonatal Resuscitation", PEDIATRICS, 117(5), pp.e955~e977 (2006), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)[DOI]
- Jonghwan Shin, "Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression-only CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial", Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 22(1), pp.22~59 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Jie Jiang, "Two-thumb–encircling hands technique is more advisable than 2-finger technique when lone rescuer performs cardiopulmonary resuscitation on infant manikin", The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 33(4), pp.531~534 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Jacek Smereka, "A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study", The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 35(10), pp.1420~1425 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Michele L. Dorfsman, "Two-thumb vs Two-finger Chest Compression in an Infant Model of Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation", Academic Emergency Medicine, 7(10), pp.1077~1082 (2000), Wiley[DOI]
- Choong Hyun Jo, "Over-the-head two-thumb encircling technique as an alternative to the two-finger technique in the in-hospital infant cardiac arrest setting: a randomised crossover simulation study", Emergency Medicine Journal, 32(9), pp.703~707 (2015), BMJ[DOI]
- Jeffrey L Pellegrino, "Two-thumb-encircling advantageous for lay responder infant CPR: a randomised manikin study", Archives of Disease in Childhood, 104(6), pp.530~534 (2019), BMJ[DOI]