가슴압박만 하는 심폐소생술과 30:2 표준 심폐소생술 방법에 의한 가슴압박 질의 비교
Comparison of chest compression quality between compression-only CPR and 30:2 conventional CPR
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the chest compression quality between compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and conventional CPR. Methods: This study involved 123 participants randomly assigned to either the chest compression-only CPR training and conventional CPR training. After training for 120 min, the participants performed CPR for 4 min and the CPR quality was evaluated. The primary outcome was evaluated as the mean compression depth, and the secondary outcome was calculated as the proportion of chest compressions with an appropriate depth among the total chest compressions. Results: The mean compression depth was more deeper in conventional CPR than in compression-only CPR (57mm vs. 53mm, p<.001). The proportion of appropriate chest compression depth was also more higher in conventional CPR (98.8% vs. 68.6%, p<.001). As compared with every minute over time for a total of 4 min, the mean compression depth and the proportion of appropriate chest compression depth were deeper and higher after 1 min in conventional CPR than in compression-only CPR. Conclusion: The results suggested that conventional CPR is a better method than compression-only CPR in terms of chest compression quality.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the chest compression quality between compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and conventional CPR. Methods: This study involved 123 participants randomly assigned to either the chest compression-only CPR training and conventional CPR training. After training for 120 min, the participants performed CPR for 4 min and the CPR quality was evaluated. The primary outcome was evaluated as the mean compression depth, and the secondary outcome was calculated as the proportion of chest compressions with an appropriate depth among the total chest compressions. Results: The mean compression depth was more deeper in conventional CPR than in compression-only CPR (57mm vs. 53mm, p<.001). The proportion of appropriate chest compression depth was also more higher in conventional CPR (98.8% vs. 68.6%, p<.001). As compared with every minute over time for a total of 4 min, the mean compression depth and the proportion of appropriate chest compression depth were deeper and higher after 1 min in conventional CPR than in compression-only CPR. Conclusion: The results suggested that conventional CPR is a better method than compression-only CPR in terms of chest compression quality.
참고문헌 (20)
- Travers AH, "Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care", circulation, 122(2), pp.S676~S684 (2010)[DOI]
- SOS-KANTO study group, "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only(SOS-KANTO): An observational study", Lancet, 369(9565), pp.920~926 (2007)[DOI]
- Bohm K, "Survival is similar after standard treatment and chest compression only in out-of-hospital bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Circulation, 116(25), pp.2908~2912 (2007)[DOI]
- Iwami T, "Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", Circulation, 116(25), pp.2900~2907 (2007)[DOI]
- Vadeboncoeur T, "Chest compression depth and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", Resuscitation, 85(2), pp.182~188 (2014)[DOI]
- Stiell IG, "Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients?", Circulation, 130(22), pp.1962~1970 (2014)[DOI]
- Hellevuo H, "Deeper chest compression - more complications for cardiac arrest patients?", Resuscitation, 84(6), pp.760~765 (2013)[DOI]
- Idris AH, "Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest", Circulation, 125, pp.3004~3012 (2012)[DOI]
- Idris AH, "Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", Crit Care Med, 43(4), pp.840~848 (2015)[DOI]
- Christenson J, "Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-ofhospital ventricular fibrillation", Circulation, 120(13), pp.1241~1247 (2009)[DOI]
- Vaillancourt C, "The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation", Resuscitation, 82(12), pp.1501~1507 (2011)[DOI]
- Ashton A1, "Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min", Resuscitation, 55(2), pp.151~155 (2002)[DOI]
- Heidenreich JW, "Rescuer fatigue:Standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Acad Emerg Med, 13(10), pp.1020~1026 (2006)[DOI]
- Bobrow BJ, "Chest compression-only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", JAMA, 304(13), pp.1447~1454 (2010)[DOI]
- Xanthos T, "Continuous chest compressions improve survival and neurologic outcome in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation", Am J Emerg Med, 30(8), pp.1389~1394 (2012)[DOI]
- Kitamura T, "Time-dependent effectiveness of chest compression-only and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin", Resuscitation, 82(1), pp.3~9 (2011)[DOI]
- Min MK, "A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model", Resuscitation, 84(9), pp.1279~1284 (2013)[DOI]
- Manders S, "Alternating providers during continuous chest compressions for cardiac arrest: Every minute or every two minutes?", Resuscitation, 80(9), pp.1015~1018 (2009)[DOI]
- Trowbridge C, "A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation", BMC Nurs, 8, pp.6~ (2009)[DOI]
- Nishiyama C, "Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR;comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR", Resuscitation, 81(9), pp.1152~1155 (2010)[DOI]
