Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
1
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Research into rehabilitation robotics has grown rapidly and the number of therapeutic rehabilitation robots has expanded dramatically during the last two decades. Robotic rehabilitation therapy can deliver high-dosage and high-intensity training, making it useful for patients with motor disorders caused by stroke or spinal cord disease. Robotic devices used for motor rehabilitation include end-effector and exoskeleton types; herein, we review the clinical use of both types. One application of robot-assisted therapy is improvement of gait function in patients with stroke. Both end-effector and the exoskeleton devices have proven to be effective complements to conventional physiotherapy in patients with subacute stroke, but there is no clear evidence that robotic gait training is superior to conventional physiotherapy in patients with chronic stroke or when delivered alone. In another application, upper limb motor function training in patients recovering from stroke, robot-assisted therapy was comparable or superior to conventional therapy in patients with subacute stroke. With end-effector devices, the intensity of therapy was the most important determinant of upper limb motor recovery. However, there is insufficient evidence for the use of exoskeleton devices for upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. For rehabilitation of hand motor function, either end-effector and exoskeleton devices showed similar or additive effects relative to conventional therapy in patients with chronic stroke. The present evidence supports the use of robot-assisted therapy for improving motor function in stroke patients as an additional therapeutic intervention in combination with the conventional rehabilitation therapies. Nevertheless, there will be substantial opportunities for technical development in near future.
Abstract
Research into rehabilitation robotics has grown rapidly and the number of therapeutic rehabilitation robots has expanded dramatically during the last two decades. Robotic rehabilitation therapy can deliver high-dosage and high-intensity training, making it useful for patients with motor disorders caused by stroke or spinal cord disease. Robotic devices used for motor rehabilitation include end-effector and exoskeleton types; herein, we review the clinical use of both types. One application of robot-assisted therapy is improvement of gait function in patients with stroke. Both end-effector and the exoskeleton devices have proven to be effective complements to conventional physiotherapy in patients with subacute stroke, but there is no clear evidence that robotic gait training is superior to conventional physiotherapy in patients with chronic stroke or when delivered alone. In another application, upper limb motor function training in patients recovering from stroke, robot-assisted therapy was comparable or superior to conventional therapy in patients with subacute stroke. With end-effector devices, the intensity of therapy was the most important determinant of upper limb motor recovery. However, there is insufficient evidence for the use of exoskeleton devices for upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. For rehabilitation of hand motor function, either end-effector and exoskeleton devices showed similar or additive effects relative to conventional therapy in patients with chronic stroke. The present evidence supports the use of robot-assisted therapy for improving motor function in stroke patients as an additional therapeutic intervention in combination with the conventional rehabilitation therapies. Nevertheless, there will be substantial opportunities for technical development in near future.
참고문헌 (53)
- Langhorne P, "Stroke rehabilitation", Lancet, 377, pp.1693~1702 (2011)
- Hong KS, "Stroke Statistics in Korea: Part I. Epidemiology and Risk Factors: A Report from the Korean Stroke Society and Clinical Research Center for Stroke", J Stroke, 15, pp.2~20 (2013)
- Barker-Collo S, "Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Part 2: Cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke", Neurology, 75, pp.1608~1616 (2010)
- Rigby H, "A systematic review of caregiver burden following stroke", Int J Stroke, 4, pp.285~292 (2009)
- Pekna M, "Modulation of neural plasticity as a basis for stroke rehabilitation", Stroke, 43, pp.2819~2828 (2012)
- European Stroke Organisation Executive C, "Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008", Cerebrovasc Dis, 25, pp.457~507 (2008)
- Kwakkel G, "Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial", Lancet, 354, pp.191~196 (1999)
- Esquenazi A, "Robotic-assisted gait training and restoration", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 91, pp.217~231 (2012)
- Pignolo L, "Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation", J Rehabil Med, 41, pp.955~960 (2009)
- Sivan M, "Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke", J Rehabil Med, 43, pp.181~189 (2011)
- Stein J, "Robotics in rehabilitation: technology as destiny", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 91, pp.199~203 (2012)
- Lum PS, "Robotic approaches for rehabilitation of hand function after stroke", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 91, pp.242~254 (2012)
- Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices", J Rehabil Med, 44, pp.193~199 (2012)
- Dias D, "Can we improve gait skills in chronic hemiplegics? A randomised control trial with gait trainer", Eura Medicophys, 43, pp.499~504 (2007)
- Morone G, "Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25, pp.636~644 (2011)
- Peurala SH, "Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke", J Rehabil Med, 41, pp.166~173 (2009)
- Peurala SH, "The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, pp.1557~1564 (2005)
- Pohl M, "Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS)", Clin Rehabil, 21, pp.17~27 (2007)
- Tong RK, "Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, pp.1298~1304 (2006)
- Werner C, "Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study", Stroke, 33, pp.2895~2901 (2002)
- Chang WH, "Effects of robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26, pp.318~324 (2012)
- Hidler J, "Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, pp.5~13 (2009)
- Hornby TG, "Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study", Stroke, 39, pp.1786~1792 (2008)
- Husemann B, "Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study", Stroke, 38, pp.349~354 (2007)
- 정경훈, "만성 뇌졸중 환자에서 운동 기능 회복에 대한 로봇-보조 보행치료의 효과", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32(3), pp.258~266 (2008), 대한재활의학회
- Mayr A, "Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 21, pp.307~314 (2007)
- Westlake KP, "Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 6, pp.18~ (2009)
- Schwartz I, "The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial", PM R, 1, pp.516~523 (2009)
- Burgar CG, "Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial", J Rehabil Res Dev, 48, pp.445~458 (2011)
- Conroy SS, "Effect of gravity on robot-assisted motor training after chronic stroke: a randomized trial", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 92, pp.1754~1761 (2011)
- Daly JJ, "Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke", J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, pp.723~736 (2005)
- Fasoli SE, "Does shorter rehabilitation limit potential recovery poststroke?", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 18, pp.88~94 (2004)
- Hesse S, "Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers", Stroke, 36, pp.1960~1966 (2005)
- Hsieh YW, "Dose-response relationship of robot-assisted stroke motor rehabilitation: the impact of initial motor status", Stroke, 43, pp.2729~2734 (2012)
- Liao WW, "Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial", Clin Rehabil, 26, pp.111~120 (2012)
- Lo AC, "Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1772~1783 (2010)
- Lum PS, "Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, pp.952~959 (2002)
- Lum PS, "MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study", J Rehabil Res Dev, 43, pp.631~642 (2006)
- Masiero S, "Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial", J Rehabil Res Dev, 48, pp.355~366 (2011)
- Masiero S, "Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88, pp.142~149 (2007)
- Wu CY, "Effect of therapist-based versus robot-assisted bilateral arm training on motor control, functional performance, and quality of life after chronic stroke: a clinical trial", Phys Ther, 92, pp.1006~1016 (2012)
- Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, pp.006876~ (2012)
- Connelly L, "A pneumatic glove and immersive virtual reality environment for hand rehabilitative training after stroke", IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 18, pp.551~559 (2010)
- Fischer HC, "Hand rehabilitation following stroke: a pilot study of assisted finger extension training in a virtual environment", Top Stroke Rehabil, 14, pp.1~12 (2007)
- Hwang CH, "Individual finger synchronized robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in subacute to chronic stroke: a prospective randomized clinical trial of efficacy", Clin Rehabil, 26, pp.696~704 (2012)
- Fazekas G, "Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: a preliminary study", J Rehabil Med, 39, pp.580~582 (2007)
- Kahn LE, "Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 3, pp.12~ (2006)
- "Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir", 2008, 66~73
- Housman SJ, "A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, pp.505~514 (2009)
- Kutner NG, "Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial", Phys Ther, 90, pp.493~504 (2010)
- Takahashi CD, "Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke", Brain, 131, pp.425~437 (2008)
- Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.006185~ (2007)
- Norouzi-Gheidari N, "Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature", J Rehabil Res Dev, 49, pp.479~496 (2012)