본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Feasibility and Usability of a Robot-Assisted Complex Upper and Lower Limb Rehabilitation System in Patients with Stroke: A Pilot Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and usability of cost-effective complex upper and lower limb robot-assisted gait training in patients with stroke using the GTR-A, a foot-plate based end-effector type robotic device. Methods Patients with subacute stroke (n=9) were included in this study. The enrolled patients received 30-minute robot-assisted gait training thrice a week for 2 weeks (6 sessions). The hand grip strength, functional ambulation categories, modified Barthel index, muscle strength test sum score, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, and Short Physical Performance Battery were used as functional assessments. The heart rate was measured to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate the usability of robot-assisted gait training. All the parameters were evaluated before and after the robot-assisted gait training program. Results Eight patients completed robot-assisted gait training, and all parameters of functional assessment significantly improved between baseline and posttraining, except for hand grip strength and muscle strength test score. The mean scores for each domain of the questionnaire were as follows: safety, 4.40±0.35; effects, 4.23±0.31; efficiency, 4.22±0.77; and satisfaction, 4.41±0.25. Conclusion Thus, the GTR-A is a feasible and safe robotic device for patients with gait impairment after stroke, resulting in improvement of ambulatory function and performance of activities of daily living with endurance training. Further research including various diseases and larger sample groups is necessary to verify the utility of this device.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and usability of cost-effective complex upper and lower limb robot-assisted gait training in patients with stroke using the GTR-A, a foot-plate based end-effector type robotic device. Methods Patients with subacute stroke (n=9) were included in this study. The enrolled patients received 30-minute robot-assisted gait training thrice a week for 2 weeks (6 sessions). The hand grip strength, functional ambulation categories, modified Barthel index, muscle strength test sum score, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, and Short Physical Performance Battery were used as functional assessments. The heart rate was measured to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate the usability of robot-assisted gait training. All the parameters were evaluated before and after the robot-assisted gait training program. Results Eight patients completed robot-assisted gait training, and all parameters of functional assessment significantly improved between baseline and posttraining, except for hand grip strength and muscle strength test score. The mean scores for each domain of the questionnaire were as follows: safety, 4.40±0.35; effects, 4.23±0.31; efficiency, 4.22±0.77; and satisfaction, 4.41±0.25. Conclusion Thus, the GTR-A is a feasible and safe robotic device for patients with gait impairment after stroke, resulting in improvement of ambulatory function and performance of activities of daily living with endurance training. Further research including various diseases and larger sample groups is necessary to verify the utility of this device.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Langhorne P, "Motor recovery after stroke : a systematic review", Lancet Neurol, 8, pp.741~754 (2009)
  2. Laufer Y, "The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation : a randomized study", J Rehabil Res Dev, 38, pp.69~78 (2001)
  3. Jun HJ, "The relationship between stroke patients’ socio-economic conditions and their quality of life : the 2010 Korean community health survey", J Phys Ther Sci, 27, pp.781~784 (2015)
  4. French B, "Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, pp.CD006073~ (2016)
  5. Moucheboeuf G, "Effects of robotic gait training after stroke : a meta-analysis", Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 63, pp.518~534 (2020)
  6. Eng JJ, "Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke : a synthesis of the evidence", Expert Rev Neurother, 7, pp.1417~1436 (2007)
  7. Page SJ, "Resistancebased, reciprocal upper and lower limb locomotor training in chronic stroke : a randomized, controlled crossover study", Clin Rehabil, 22, pp.610~617 (2008)
  8. Oh K, "Improved cortical activity and reduced gait asymmetry during poststroke self-paced walking rehabilitation", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 18, pp.60~ (2021)
  9. Hidler J, "Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, pp.5~13 (2009)
  10. Hesse S, "Innovative gait robot for the repetitive practice of floor walking and stair climbing up and down in stroke patients", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 7, pp.30~ (2010)
  11. Su Y, "Prevalence of stroke-related sarcopenia : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 29, pp.105092~ (2020)
  12. van Nunen MP, "Exercise intensity of robot-assisted walking versus overground walking in nonambulatory stroke patients", J Rehabil Res Dev, 49, pp.1537~1546 (2012)
  13. Sharif H, "Effects of FES-ambulation training on locomotor function and health-related quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury", Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 20, pp.58~69 (2014)
  14. Siegle CBH, "Effects of robotic intervention associated with conventional therapy on gait speed and resistance and trunk control in stroke patients", Acta Fisiátr, 26, pp.127~129 (2019)
  15. "Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices;guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff" (2016)[URL]
  16. Faulkner L, "Beyond the five-user assumption : benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing", Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 35, pp.379~383 (2003)
  17. Seo JW, "Biomechanical analysis in five bar linkage prototype machine of gait training and rehabilitation by IMU sensor and electromyography", Sensors(Basel), 21, pp.1726~ (2021)
  18. Garber CE, "American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults : guidance for prescribing exercise", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 43, pp.1334~1359 (2011)
  19. Seung Hyun Kwon, "Energy Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction of Gait With Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis and Robot (ReWalk)-Assisted Gait in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(2), pp.131~141 (2020), 대한재활의학회[DOI]
  20. Hermans G, "Interobserver agreement of Medical Research Council sum-score and handgrip strength in the intensive care unit", Muscle Nerve, 45, pp.18~25 (2012)
  21. Dietz V, "Interaction between central programs and afferent input in the control of posture and locomotion", J Biomech, 29, pp.841~844 (1996)
  22. 김진철, "The effects of coordinative locomotor training on coordination and gait in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial", Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 14(6), pp.1010~1016 (2018), 한국운동재활학회
  23. Stephenson JL, "The coordination of upper and lower limb movements during gait in healthy and stroke individuals", Gait Posture, 29, pp.11~16 (2009)
  24. Ford MP, "Phase manipulation and walking in stroke", J Neurol Phys Ther, 31, pp.85~91 (2007)
  25. Bovonsunthonchai S, "Effect of speed on the upper and contralateral lower limb coordination during gait in individuals with stroke", Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 28, pp.667~672 (2012)
  26. Ford MP, "Arm constraint and walking in healthy adults", Gait Posture, 26, pp.135~141 (2007)
  27. Morone G, "Robot-assisted gait training for stroke patients : current state of the art and perspectives of robotics", Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 13, pp.1303~1311 (2017)
  28. Morone G, "Who may benefit from roboticassisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25, pp.636~644 (2011)
  29. Peurala SH, "Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke", J Rehabil Med, 41, pp.166~173 (2009)
  30. Chang WH, "Effects of robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients : a randomized controlled study", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26, pp.318~324 (2012)
  31. Baronchelli F, "The effect of robotic assisted gait training with Lokomat ® on balance control after stroke : systematic review and meta-analysis", Front Neurol, 12, pp.661815~ (2021)
  32. Hornby TG, "Importance of specificity, amount, and intensity of locomotor training to improve ambulatory function in patients poststroke", Top Stroke Rehabil, 18, pp.293~307 (2011)
  33. Molteni F, "Exoskeleton and end-effector robots for upper and lower limbs rehabilitation : narrative review", PM R, 10(9 Suppl 2), pp.S174~S188 (2018)
  34. Iosa M, "Driving electromechanically assisted Gait Trainer for people with stroke", J Rehabil Res Dev, 48, pp.135~146 (2011)
  35. Stoller O, "Efficacy of feedback-controlled robotics-assisted treadmill exercise to improve cardiovascular fitness early after stroke : a randomized controlled pilot trial", J Neurol Phys Ther, 39, pp.156~165 (2015)
  36. Luo L, "Effect of high-intensity exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness in stroke survivors : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 63, pp.59~68 (2020)
  37. Bessler J, "Occurrence and type of adverse events during the use of stationary gait robotsa systematic literature review", Front Robot AI, 7, pp.557606~ (2020)
  38. Chin LF, "Evaluation of robotic-assisted locomotor training outcomes at a rehabilitation centre in Singapore", Singapore Med J, 51, pp.840~ (2010)
  39. Mao X, "Development of a novel test method for skin safety verification of physical assistant robots", Paper presented at: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (2015)
  40. Akiyama Y, "Test method for contact safety assessment of a wearable robot-analysis of load caused by a misalignment of the knee joint-", Paper presented at : 2012 IEEE ROMAN : The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

Feasibility of Rehabilitation Training With a Newly Developed, Portable, Gait Assistive Robot for Balance Function in Hemiplegic Patients김미정, 김현배, 성준현, 신동빈, 윤덕원, 이규한, 장혜연, 지영훈, 최세훈, 한창수, 황승훈대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2017 · 제41권 제2호The Effects of Progressive Velocity Robot-assisted Gait Training on Balance and Gait Abilities in Stroke PatientsPark Jae-ho한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2025 · 제32권 제2호Effect of the Robot-assisted Gait Training Frequency on Balance and Gait in Stroke Patients in Convalescent Rehabilitation Hospitals: A Preliminary StudyBong-Sik Woo, Dae-Hwan Lee, Dae-Seong Han, Eung-Sung Kim, Jin-Ook Choi, Jong-Hyeon Lim, Moo-Hong Yoon, Tae-lim Yoon, Yong-Hwa Park한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2024 · 제31권 제3호Effect of Caregiver Driven Robot-Assisted In-Ward Training in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Case Series김상범, 박주원, 박진기, 이경우, 이숙정, 이종화대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제2호Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Gait Training with an End-Effector Type Device for Various Neurologic Disorders이장우, Choi Soojin, Jeon Ha Ra, Kim Dong Yeong, Kim Seong Woo, Lee June Sung대한뇌신경재활학회 · 뇌신경재활2020 · 제13권 제1호Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation김연희, 장원혁대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2013 · 제15권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)