본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

로봇 중재가 뇌졸중 환자의 상지기능에 미치는 영향: 무작위대조연구에 대한 메타분석

The Effect of Robotic Intervention on Upper Limb Function in Individuals with Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: The main symptom of stroke is upper limb function deficit. Robotic intervention has been applied to treat the paretic upper limb. Through this meta-analysis, we investigated the effect of robotic intervention on upper limb function recovery of individuals with stroke. Methods: The analyzed studies were identified through electronic search engines such as PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE for the last 5 years. The PEDro scale was used to rate the methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis is performed to analyze the sample size, means, and standard deviations in selected studies. Results: Ten randomized controlled trails were included for meta-analysis. PEDro scale was more than 6 points in all studies. Three hundred twenty subjects participated in included studies. In order to statistically analyze the effect size of the robotic interventions, the outcomes of studies were classified into upper limb function (ULF) and activities of daily living (ADL). In consideration of heterogeneity of effect size, we used random effect model. Metaanalysis of 10 trials showed “small effect size”. The effect size of ULF was 0.288 and the effect size of ADL was 0.265. Conclusions: Robotic intervention was not more effective than other dose-matching conventional therapies. Therefore, it is necessary to select appropriate individual interventions reflect characteristics of the individuals with stroke and robotic interventions may be used as a complementary methods to conventional therapy.

Abstract

Objectives: The main symptom of stroke is upper limb function deficit. Robotic intervention has been applied to treat the paretic upper limb. Through this meta-analysis, we investigated the effect of robotic intervention on upper limb function recovery of individuals with stroke. Methods: The analyzed studies were identified through electronic search engines such as PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE for the last 5 years. The PEDro scale was used to rate the methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis is performed to analyze the sample size, means, and standard deviations in selected studies. Results: Ten randomized controlled trails were included for meta-analysis. PEDro scale was more than 6 points in all studies. Three hundred twenty subjects participated in included studies. In order to statistically analyze the effect size of the robotic interventions, the outcomes of studies were classified into upper limb function (ULF) and activities of daily living (ADL). In consideration of heterogeneity of effect size, we used random effect model. Metaanalysis of 10 trials showed “small effect size”. The effect size of ULF was 0.288 and the effect size of ADL was 0.265. Conclusions: Robotic intervention was not more effective than other dose-matching conventional therapies. Therefore, it is necessary to select appropriate individual interventions reflect characteristics of the individuals with stroke and robotic interventions may be used as a complementary methods to conventional therapy.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Jorgensen HS, "Neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen Stroke Study", Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 10(4), pp.887~906 (1999)[DOI]
  2. Morris JH, "Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: the role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction", Disabil Rehabil, 35(4), pp.291~299 (2013)[DOI]
  3. Franceschini M, "Is health-relatedquality of life of stroke patients influenced by neurological impairments at one year after stroke?", Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 46(3), pp.389~399 (2010)
  4. Taub E, "Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74(4), pp.347~354 (1993)
  5. Broeren J, "Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85(8), pp.1247~1250 (2004)[DOI]
  6. Pollock A, "Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2014)[DOI]
  7. Kwakkel G, "Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial", Lancet, 354(9174), pp.191~196 (1999)[DOI]
  8. Kleim JA, "Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage", J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51(1), pp.S225~S239 (2008)[DOI]
  9. Liepert J, "Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans", Stroke, 31(6), pp.1210~1216 (2000)[DOI]
  10. Page SJ, "Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 19(1), pp.27~32 (2005)[DOI]
  11. Kwon JS, "Effects of virtual reality on upper extremity function and activities of daily living performance in acute stroke: a double-blind randomized clinical trial", NeuroRehabilitation, 31(4), pp.379~385 (2012)
  12. Wagner TH, "An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke", Stroke, 42(9), pp.2630~2632 (2011)[DOI]
  13. Timmermans AA, "Technologyassisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 6, pp.1~ (2009)[DOI]
  14. Loureiro RC, "Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push", Med Biol Eng Comput, 49(10), pp.1103~1118 (2011)[DOI]
  15. Norouzi-Gheidari N, "Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature", J Rehabil Res Dev, 49(4), pp.479~496 (2012)[DOI]
  16. Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2015)
  17. Moseley AM, "Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)", Aust J Physiother, 48(1), pp.43~49 (2002)[DOI]
  18. Ang KK, "Braincomputer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke", Front Neuroeng, 7, pp.30~30 (2014)
  19. Hesse S, "Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial", Clin Rehabil, 28(7), pp.637~647 (2014)[DOI]
  20. Hsieh YW, "Bilateral robotic priming before task-oriented approach in subacute stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial", Clin Rehabil, 31(2), pp.225~233 (2017)[DOI]
  21. McCabe J, "Comparison of robotics, functional electrical stimulation, and motor learning methods for treatment of persistent upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: a randomized controlled trial", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 96(6), pp.981~990 (2015)[DOI]
  22. Page SJ, "Portable upper extremity robotics is as efficacious as upper extremity rehabilitative therapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial", Clin Rehabil, 27(6), pp.494~503 (2013)[DOI]
  23. Sale P, "Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 11(1), pp.104~104 (2014)[DOI]
  24. Susanto EA, "Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 12(1), pp.42~42 (2015)[DOI]
  25. Takahashi K, "Efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute poststroke hemiplegia: an exploratory randomized trial", Stroke, 47(5), pp.1385~1388 (2016)[DOI]
  26. Tomic TJ, "ArmAssist robotic system versus matched conventional therapy for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial", Biomed Res Int, 2017, pp.7659893~ (2017)
  27. Wu CY, "Unilateral versus bilateral robot-assisted rehabilitation on arm-trunk control and functions post stroke: a randomized controlled trial", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 10, pp.35~ (2013)[DOI]
  28. Borenstein M, "Introduction to meta-analysis" (2009), Wiley Online Library
  29. Cohen J, "Statistical power for the social sciences", pp.98~101 (1988), Laurence Erlbaum and Associates
  30. Rosenthal R, "Comparing effect sizes of independent studies", Psychol Bull, 92(2), pp.500~ (1982)[DOI]
  31. Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012)
  32. Veerbeek JM, "Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 31(2), pp.107~121 (2017)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)