본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Brain-machine Interface in Robot-assisted Neurorehabilitation for Patients with Stroke and Upper Extremity Weakness – the Therapeutic Turning Point

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Activity and participation after stroke can be increased by neurorehabilitation of upper extremity. As the technology advances, a robot-assisted restorative therapy with/without a brain-machine interface (BMI) is suggested as a promising therapeutic option. Understanding the therapeutic point of view about robots and BMIs can be linked to the patient-oriented usability of the devices. The therapeutic turning point concept of robotassisted rehabilitation with BMIs, basics of robotics for stroke and upper extremity weakness and consequent neuroplasticity/motor recovery are reviewed.

Abstract

Activity and participation after stroke can be increased by neurorehabilitation of upper extremity. As the technology advances, a robot-assisted restorative therapy with/without a brain-machine interface (BMI) is suggested as a promising therapeutic option. Understanding the therapeutic point of view about robots and BMIs can be linked to the patient-oriented usability of the devices. The therapeutic turning point concept of robotassisted rehabilitation with BMIs, basics of robotics for stroke and upper extremity weakness and consequent neuroplasticity/motor recovery are reviewed.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. Kostanjsek N, "Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems", BMC Public Health, 11(4), pp.S3~ (2011)
  2. Brønnum-Hansen H, "Thorvaldsen PDanish MONICA Study Group. Long-term survival and causes of death after stroke", Stroke, 32, pp.2131~2136 (2001)
  3. Levin MF, "What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke?", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, pp.313~319 (2009)
  4. Hogan N, "Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery", J Rehabil Res Dev, 43, pp.605~618 (2006)
  5. Kraus D, "Brain-robot interface driven plasticity: Distributed modulation of corticospinal excitability", Neuroimage, 125, pp.522~532 (2016)
  6. Shih JJ, "Brain-computer interfaces in medicine", Mayo Clin Proc, 87, pp.268~279 (2012)
  7. Langhorne P, "Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review", Lancet Neurol, 8, pp.741~754 (2009)
  8. Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD006876~ (2012)
  9. Pollock A, "Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD010820~ (2014)
  10. Norouzi-Gheidari N, "Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature", J Rehabil Res Dev, 49, pp.479~496 (2012)
  11. Poli P, "Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients’ therapy", Biomed Res Int, 2013, pp.153872~ (2013)
  12. O’Dell MW, "Stroke rehabilitation: strategies to enhance motor recovery", Annu Rev Med, 60, pp.55~68 (2009)
  13. Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD006876~ (2008)
  14. Kitago T, "Robotic therapy for chronic stroke: general recovery of impairment or improved task-specific skill?", J Neurophysiol, 114, pp.1885~1894 (2015)
  15. Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD006876~ (2015)
  16. Winstein CJ, "Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association", American Stroke Association, 2016, pp.47, e98~e169
  17. Koch P, "Structural connectivity analyses in motor recovery research after stroke", Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 3, pp.233~244 (2016)
  18. Hesse S, "Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke: walking and arm", hand function, 2008, pp.105, 330~336
  19. Planelles D, "Evaluating classifiers to detect arm movement intention from EEG signals", Sensors (Basel), 14, pp.18172~18186 (2014)
  20. Shindo K, "Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study", J Rehabil Med, 43, pp.951~957 (2011)
  21. Zeiler SR, "The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain", Curr Opin Neurol, 26, pp.609~616 (2013)
  22. Young BM, "Changes in functional brain organization and behavioral correlations after rehabilitative therapy using a brain-computer interface", Front Neuroeng, 7, pp.26~ (2014)
  23. Young BM, "Changes in functional connectivity correlate with behavioral gains in stroke patients after therapy using a brain-computer interface device", Front Neuroeng, 7, pp.25~ (2014)
  24. Ushiba J, "Brain-machine interfaces for rehabilitation of poststroke hemiplegia", Prog Brain Res, 228, pp.163~183 (2016)
  25. Ramos-Murguialday A, "Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study", Ann Neurol, 74, pp.100~108 (2013)
  26. Ang KK, "A randomized controlled trial of EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke", Clin EEG Neurosci, 46, pp.310~320 (2015)
  27. Bhagat NA, "Design and optimization of an EEG-based brain machine interface (BMI) to an upper-limb exoskeleton for stroke survivors", Front Neurosci, 10, pp.122~ (2016)
  28. Babaiasl M, "A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke", Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 11, pp.263~280 (2016)
  29. Proietti T, "Upper-limb robotic exoskeletons for neurorehabilitation: a review on control strategies", IEEE Rev Biomed Eng, 9, pp.4~14 (2016)
  30. Iosa M, "The three laws of neurorobotics: a review on what neurorehabilitation robots should do for patients and clinicians", J Med Biol Eng, 36, pp.1~11 (2016)
  31. O’Malley MK, "Assessing and inducing neuroplasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation and robotics for motor function", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, pp.S59~S66 (2006)
  32. Castro-Alamancos MA, "The motor cortex: a network tuned to 7-14 Hz", Front Neural Circuits, 7, pp.21~ (2013)
  33. Chaudhary U, "Brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation", Nat Rev Neurol, 12, pp.513~525 (2016)
  34. Pfurtscheller G, "Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface systems", Computer (Long Beach Calif), 41, pp.58~65 (2008)
  35. Koch C, "Consciousness: confessions of a romantic reductionist" (2012), MIT Press
  36. Naros G, "Reinforcement learning of self-regulated sensorimotor β-oscillations improves motor performance", Neuroimage, 134, pp.142~152 (2016)
  37. Wogar MA, "Evidence for an involvement of 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurones in the maintenance of operant behaviour by positive reinforcement", Psychopharmacology (Berl), 105, pp.119~124 (1991)
  38. Takeuchi N, "Combinations of stroke neurorehabilitation to facilitate motor recovery: perspectives on Hebbian plasticity and homeostatic metaplasticity", Front Hum Neurosci, 9, pp.349~ (2015)
  39. Wu X, "Long-term effectiveness of intensive therapy in chronic stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 30, pp.583~590 (2016)
  40. Kandel ER, "Principles of neural science" (2000), McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division
  41. Soekadar SR, "Brain-machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke", Neurobiol Dis, 83, pp.172~179 (2015)
  42. Nudo RJ, "Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery", Stroke, 38, pp.840~845 (2007)
  43. Dancause N, "Shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after injury", Prog Brain Res, 192, pp.273~295 (2011)
  44. Volz LJ, "Differential modulation of motor network connectivity during movements of the upper and lower limbs", Neuroimage, 119, pp.44~53 (2015)
  45. Turner DL, "Neurophysiology of robot-mediated training and therapy: a perspective for future use in clinical populations", Front Neurol, 4, pp.184~ (2013)
  46. Richards LG, "Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence", Neuropsychologia, 46, pp.3~11 (2008)
  47. Takeuchi N, "Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity", Stroke Res Treat, 2013, pp.128641~ (2013)
  48. Veerbeek JM, "What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis", PLoS One, 9, pp.e87987~ (2014)
  49. Kahn LE, "Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 3, pp.12~ (2006)
  50. Vanoglio F, "Feasibility and efficacy of a robotic device for hand rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized pilot controlled study", Clin Rehabil (2016)
  51. Orihuela-Espina F, "Robot training for hand motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial", J Hand Ther, 29, pp.51~57 (2016)
  52. Carel C, "Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimotor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects", J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 20, pp.478~484 (2000)
  53. Waldner A, "Transfer of scientific concepts to clinical practice: recent robot-assisted training studies", Funct Neurol, 24, pp.173~177 (2009)
  54. Kleim JA, "Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage", J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, pp.S225~S239 (2008)
  55. Remsik A, "A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke", Expert Rev Med Devices, 13, pp.445~454 (2016)
  56. Vidal GW, "Review of brain-machine interfaces used in neural prosthetics with new perspective on somatosensory feedback through method of signal breakdown", Scientifica (Cairo), 2016, pp.8956432~ (2016)
  57. Venkatakrishnan A, "Applications of brain-machine interface systems in stroke recovery and rehabilitation", Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep, 2, pp.93~105 (2014)
  58. Rizzolatti G, "Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action", Nat Rev Neurosci, 2, pp.661~670 (2001)
  59. Soekadar SR, "Systems-neuroscience and rehabilitation", pp.3~18 (2011), Springer
  60. Huang VS, "Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 6, pp.5~ (2009)
  61. Reinkensmeyer DJ, "Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 13, pp.42~ (2016)
  62. Wolpaw JR, "Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control", Clin Neurophysiol, 113, pp.767~791 (2002)
  63. García JA, "Analysis of effects of distribution of practice in learning and retention of a continuous and a discrete skill presented on a computer", Percept Mot Skills, 107, pp.261~272 (2008)
  64. Kenyon LK, "Applying motor-control theory to physical therapy practice: a case report", Physiother Can, 63, pp.345~354 (2011)
  65. Krebs HI, "A working model of stroke recovery from rehabilitation robotics practitioners", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 6, pp.6~ (2009)
  66. Krakauer JW, "Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation", Curr Opin Neurol, 19, pp.84~90 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)