Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is preferred for sampling of lymph nodes (LNs) adjacentto the gastrointestinal wall; however, fine-needle biopsy (FNB) may provide improved diagnostic outcomes. This study aimed toevaluate the comparative effcacy and safety of FNA versus FNB for LN sampling. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study of prospectively collected data to evaluate outcomes of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNBfor LN sampling. Characteristics analyzed included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the number of needle passes, diagnostic adequacyof rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), cell-block analysis, and adverse events. Results: A total of 209 patients underwent EUS-guided LN sampling. The mean lesion size was 16.22±8.03 mm, with similar sensitivityand accuracy between FNA and FNB ([67.21% vs. 75.00%, respectively, p=0.216] and [78.80% vs. 83.17%, respectively, p=0.423]). Thespecificity of FNB was better than that of FNA (100.00% vs. 93.62%, p=0.01). The number of passes required for diagnosis was notdifferent. Abdominal and peri-hepatic LN location demonstrated FNB to have a higher sensitivity (81.08% vs. 64.71%, p=0.031 and80.95% vs. 58.33%, p=0.023) and accuracy (88.14% vs. 75.29%, p=0.053 and 88.89% vs. 70.49%, p=0.038), respectively. ROSE was asignificant predictor for accuracy (odds ratio, 5.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–23.08; p=0.032). No adverse events were reported ineither cohort. Conclusions: Both EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB are safe for the diagnosis of LNs. EUS-FNB is preferred for abdominal LN sampling. EUS-FNA+ROSE was similar to EUS-FNB alone, showing better diagnosis for EUS-FNB than traditional FNA. While ROSE remained asignificant predictor for accuracy, due to its poor availability in most centers, its use may be limited to cases with previous inconclusivediagnoses.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is preferred for sampling of lymph nodes (LNs) adjacentto the gastrointestinal wall; however, fine-needle biopsy (FNB) may provide improved diagnostic outcomes. This study aimed toevaluate the comparative effcacy and safety of FNA versus FNB for LN sampling. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study of prospectively collected data to evaluate outcomes of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNBfor LN sampling. Characteristics analyzed included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the number of needle passes, diagnostic adequacyof rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), cell-block analysis, and adverse events. Results: A total of 209 patients underwent EUS-guided LN sampling. The mean lesion size was 16.22±8.03 mm, with similar sensitivityand accuracy between FNA and FNB ([67.21% vs. 75.00%, respectively, p=0.216] and [78.80% vs. 83.17%, respectively, p=0.423]). Thespecificity of FNB was better than that of FNA (100.00% vs. 93.62%, p=0.01). The number of passes required for diagnosis was notdifferent. Abdominal and peri-hepatic LN location demonstrated FNB to have a higher sensitivity (81.08% vs. 64.71%, p=0.031 and80.95% vs. 58.33%, p=0.023) and accuracy (88.14% vs. 75.29%, p=0.053 and 88.89% vs. 70.49%, p=0.038), respectively. ROSE was asignificant predictor for accuracy (odds ratio, 5.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–23.08; p=0.032). No adverse events were reported ineither cohort. Conclusions: Both EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB are safe for the diagnosis of LNs. EUS-FNB is preferred for abdominal LN sampling. EUS-FNA+ROSE was similar to EUS-FNB alone, showing better diagnosis for EUS-FNB than traditional FNA. While ROSE remained asignificant predictor for accuracy, due to its poor availability in most centers, its use may be limited to cases with previous inconclusivediagnoses.
참고문헌 (32)
- Lisotti A, "Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes : a meta-analysis", Endosc Int Open, 7, pp.E504~E513 (2019)
- Cui XW, "New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation", World J Gastroenterol, 19, pp.4850~4860 (2013)
- Chen VK, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is superior to lymph node echofeatures : a prospective evaluation of mediastinal and peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy", Am J Gastroenterol, 99, pp.628~633 (2004)
- Puli SR, "Endoscopic ultrasound : it’s accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy?", A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol, 14, pp.3028~3037 (2008)
- Dietrich CF, "Endoscopic ultrasound : elastographic lymph node evaluation", Endosc Ultrasound, 4, pp.176~190 (2015)
- Moura DTH, "EUS-FNA versus ERCP for tissue diagnosis of suspect malignant biliary strictures : a prospective comparative study", Endosc Int Open, 6, pp.E769~E777 (2018)
- Dumonceau JM, "Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)clinical guideline-updated January 2017", Endoscopy, 49, pp.695~714 (2017)
- Puri R, "Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA and cytology in suspected tubercular intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.1005~1010 (2012)
- De Moura DT, "Pancreatic metastases from ocular malignant melanoma : the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to establish a definitive cytologic diagnosis : a case report", J Med Case Rep, 10, pp.332~ (2016)
- Nieuwoudt M, "Polymerase chain reaction amplifying mycobacterial DNA from aspirates obtained by endoscopic ultrasound allows accurate diagnosis of mycobacterial disease in HIV-positive patients with abdominal lymphadenopathy", Ultrasound Med Biol, 40, pp.2031~2038 (2014)
- Pepe MS, "The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Campbell I, "Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations", Stat Med, 26, pp.3661~3675 (2007)
- Gress FG, "Endoscopic ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration biopsy guided by endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer : a comparison study", Ann Intern Med, 127(8 Pt 1), pp.604~612 (1997)
- Williams DB, "Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy : a large single centre experience", Gut, 44, pp.720~726 (1999)
- Bang JY, "In memoriam : fine-needle aspiration, birth : fine-needle biopsy : the changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition", Dig Endosc, 31, pp.197~202 (2019)
- Ribeiro A, "EUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis and classification of lymphoma", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.851~855 (2010)
- De Moura DTH, "Primary adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas : the use of endoscopic ultrasound guided-fine needle aspiration to establish a definitive cytologic diagnosis", Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 37, pp.370~373 (2017)
- De Moura DTH, "The importance of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas : two case reports", J Med Case Rep, 12, pp.107~ (2018)
- Varadarajulu S, "The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle : good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation?", Results of a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc, 80, pp.1056~1063 (2014)
- Wang J, "Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy in sampling pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis", Medicine(Baltimore), 96, pp.e7452~ (2017)
- Lee YN, "Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses : a randomized parallel-group study", Endoscopy, 46, pp.1056~1062 (2014)
- Reed CE, "Esophageal cancer staging : improved accuracy by endoscopic ultrasound of celiac lymph nodes", Ann Thorac Surg, 67, pp.319~321 (1999)
- Kappelle WFW, "Rapid on-site evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes does not increase diagnostic yield : a randomized, multicenter trial", Am J Gastroenterol, 113, pp.677~685 (2018)
- Cleveland P, "An evaluation of risk factors for inadequate cytology in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tumors and lymph nodes", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.1194~1199 (2010)
- Storch I, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions : when tissue is the issue", Surg Endosc, 22, pp.86~90 (2008)
- Matynia AP, "Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.697~705 (2014)
- Rajesh N. Keswani, "Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy", Clinical Endoscopy, 47(3), pp.242~247 (2014), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Rodrigues-Pinto E, "Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment : a preliminary study", Gastrointest Endosc, 84, pp.1040~1046 (2016)
- Ihab I. El Hajj, "Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions", Clinical Endoscopy, 51(6), pp.576~583 (2018), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Iglesias-Garcia J, "Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle : results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.1189~1196 (2011)
- Iwai T, "Randomized crossover trial comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors", Diagn Cytopathol, 46, pp.228~233 (2018)
- Guedes HG, "A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clinics(Sao Paulo), 73, pp.e261~ (2018)