『文學案内』誌研究(2) - 実録文学論と田村栄太郎の「大衆文学のよみかた」-
The study of <Bungaku Annai>magazine(2)-Focusing on the literary criticizm of documentary stories and ‘How to read the popular literature’ by Tamura Eitaro
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kishi Yamaji proposed the literary criticism of the documentary stories as an outcome of the efforts that criticized the absurd popular literatures and was going to approach the reader from the writer side in healthy popular literatures for the fourth the art popularization discussion in the proletarian literature. And what was serialized in “Bungaku Annai Magazine” as the first step of the literary criticism of the documentary stories was “How to read the popular literature” by Tamura Eitaro. Because the documentary stories of the late Edo period was becoming basic of the established popular literatures. First of all, this study investigates how it was proposed with the literary criticism of the documentary stories of Kishi Yamaji and how it is taken up with “Bungaku Annai magazine”. The following part looks into how the documantary storie of the late Edo period was becoming basic of the popular literatures. Finally part looks into “how to read the popular literature” by tamura. Tamura criticized on the documantary storie of the late Edo period, “Tyuji Kunisada” “Hikozaemon Okubo” “Komon Mito”. So This study aims to re-examine the validity of Tamura's essay through each works.
Abstract
Kishi Yamaji proposed the literary criticism of the documentary stories as an outcome of the efforts that criticized the absurd popular literatures and was going to approach the reader from the writer side in healthy popular literatures for the fourth the art popularization discussion in the proletarian literature. And what was serialized in “Bungaku Annai Magazine” as the first step of the literary criticism of the documentary stories was “How to read the popular literature” by Tamura Eitaro. Because the documentary stories of the late Edo period was becoming basic of the established popular literatures. First of all, this study investigates how it was proposed with the literary criticism of the documentary stories of Kishi Yamaji and how it is taken up with “Bungaku Annai magazine”. The following part looks into how the documantary storie of the late Edo period was becoming basic of the popular literatures. Finally part looks into “how to read the popular literature” by tamura. Tamura criticized on the documantary storie of the late Edo period, “Tyuji Kunisada” “Hikozaemon Okubo” “Komon Mito”. So This study aims to re-examine the validity of Tamura's essay through each works.
참고문헌 (26)
- 尾崎秀樹, "プロレタリア大衆文学論, In 大衆文学論", pp.125~ (1972), 勁草書房
- 高橋圭一, "実録研究ー筋を通す文學", pp.2~384 (2002), 清文堂出版
- 百瀬明治, "怪傑大久保彦左衛門ー天下の御意見番の真実", pp.24~196 (2000), 集英社新書
- 演劇博物館, "国劇要覧", pp.327~392 (1932), 梓書房
- 作者不詳, "絵入国定忠治実記", pp.7~120 (1886), 明進堂
- 大久保忠教, "三河物語(第三下", pp.106~134 (1890), 日本戦史会
- 作者不詳, "宇都宮騒動之記, In 大久保武蔵鐙", pp.191~321 (1891), 礫川出版会社
- 作者不詳, "松前屋五郎兵衛之傳, In 大久保武蔵鐙", pp.4~121 (1891), 礫川出版会社
- 作者不詳, "彦左衛門功績之記, In 大久保武蔵鐙", pp.325~515 (1891), 礫川出版会社
- 早稲田大学編集部, "増補日光邯鄲枕", pp.1~62 (1919), 早稲田大学出版部
- 早稲田大学編集部, "護国女太平記, In 近世実録全書第8巻", pp.74~77 (1918), 早稲田大学出版部
- 早稲田大学編集部, "天草騒動, In 近世実録全書第12巻", pp.147~235 (1918), 早稲田大学出版部
- 早稲田大学編集部, "近世実録全書第11巻", pp.291~ (1918), 早稲田大学出版部
- 早稲田大学編集部, "め組の喧嘩, In 近世実録全書第3巻", pp.34~103 (1917), 早稲田大学出版部
- 早稲田大学編集部, "水戸黄門記, In 近世実録全書第13巻", pp.1~149 (1918), 早稲田大学出版部
- 鼈甲斎虎丸口演, "水戸黄門漫遊記", pp.16~126 (1912), 国華堂書店
- 早稲田大学編集部, "越後伝吉, In 近世実録全書第8巻", pp.1~107 (1918), 早稲田大学出版部
- 田村栄太郎, "大衆文学のよみ方(1)-国定忠治の分析", 文學案内, 179~181 (1935)
- 田村栄太郎, "大衆文学のよみ方(2)ー大久保彦左衛門の解説", 文學案内, 136~137 (1935)
- 田村栄太郎, "大衆文学のよみ方(3)-水戸黄門光國の解説", 文學案内, 67~69 (1935)
- 文學案内編集部, ""大衆文学のよみ方"について", 文學案内, ~ (1936)
- 片岡貢, "実録文學研究会の人々", 文學案内, 90~ (1935)
- 木村毅, ""実録文學"の抱負", 文學案内, 19~20 (1935)
- 文學案内編集部, "文壇の巨匠に訊くー藤森成吉氏の創作苦心談", 文學案内, 64~ (1935)
- 和田崇, ""蟹工船"の読めない労働者ー貴司山治と徳永直の芸術大衆化論の位相", 立命館文學, (614), pp.313~ (2009), 立命館大学
- 河竹繁俊, "実録の沿革, In 近世実録全書第1巻", pp.1~38 (1919), 早稲田大学出版部