본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학생의 비대면 진료 수용의향에 관한 연구: 사회인지이론과 기술수용모델을 중심으로

A Research on the intention to accept telemedicine of undergraduate students: based on Social Cognitive Theory and Technology Acceptance Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 코로나 상황에서 한시적으로 허용된 비대면 진료에 대한 대학생의 수용행동을 탐색하기 위하여 진행되었다. 비대면 진료의 의료 서비스 및 디지털 기술 간 융합 특성을 반영하여, 각 분야의 수용행동을 이해하기 위하여 널리 연구되어 온 사회인지이론과 기술수용모델을 기반으로 비대면 진료에 대한 대학생의 인식 및 수용의향의 영향요인을 조사하였다. 연구모델 및 가설 검증을 위하여 비대면 진료 사용 경험이 없는 대학생을 대상으로 2021년 9월 8일부터 10일까지 온라인 설문조사를 시행하였다. 총 184개의 데이터가 수집되었으며, SPSS 28.0 프로그램을 이용하여 다중회귀분석 등을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 건강기술 자기효능감, 유용성 이점, 편의성 이점, 사회적 규범, 비대면 진료 제공자에 대한 신뢰가 대학생의 비대면 진료 수용의향에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 디지털 네이티브 세대인 대학생을 비대면 진료의 새로운 타겟으로 보고, 이들을 공략하기 위한 전략의 기초 방향을 제시했음에 의의가 있다.

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore the acceptance behavior of undergraduate students toward telemedicine, which is temporarily allowed in the COVID-19. We applied social cognitive theory and technology acceptance model in order to reflect the convergence characteristics between medical service and digital technology of telemedicine. Based on these theoretical backgrounds, we investigated perception toward telemedicine and determinants of intention to accept telemedicine. To examine the research model and hypothesis, an online survey was conducted for college students who have not used telemedicine from September 8 to 10, 2021. A total of 184 data were collected, and multiple regression analysis was conducted using the SPSS 28.0 program. The results showed that health technology self-efficacy, usefulness and convenience benefits, social norm, and trust in telemedicine providers had positive effects on intention to accept telemedicine. This study is meaningful in that it selected undergraduate students, who are digital natives, as new targets for telemedicine, and presented the basic direction of strategies to target them.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, "Announcement of "Temporary Permissible Measures for Telephone Consultation or Prescription and Proxy Prescription"" (2020), MOHW
  2. B. Calton, "Telemedicine in the Time of Coronavirus", Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 60(1), pp.12~14 (2020)[DOI]
  3. 윤효영, "비대면 시대 원격의료의 정착을 위한 법제도 개선 방안", 법학논총, 45(1), pp.449~498 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
  4. 최연석, "원격의료의 도입에 관한 연구 - 코로나바이러스감염증19 전염병과 원격의료 도입의 필요성 -", 국제법무, 12(1), pp.113~137 (2020), 법과정책연구원[DOI]
  5. W. Barbosa, "Improving Access to Care : Telemedicine Across Medical Domains", Annual Review of Public Health, 42, pp.463~481 (2021)[DOI]
  6. 백경희, "펜데믹(Pandemic) 기간 동안의 원격의료 허용 여부 및 그 범위에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 48, pp.341~369 (2020), 법학연구소[DOI]
  7. C. Peters, "Anatomy of successful business models for complex services : Insights from the telemedicine field", Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(3), pp.75~104 (2015)[DOI]
  8. 진석, "비대면 진료의 이용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 20(12), pp.180~197 (2020), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  9. 구준혁, "50~60대의 원격의료서비스 수용에 관한 연구", 보건사회연구, 41(1), pp.265~282 (2021), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
  10. O. Bestsennyy, "Telehealth : a quarter-trillion-dollar post-COVID-19reality" (2020), McKinsey and Company
  11. M. E. Waselewski, "Perspectives on Telemedicine from a National Study of Youth in the United States", Telemedicine and e-Health (2021)[DOI]
  12. "Telehealth, Telemedicine, and Telecare:What's What?" (2021)[URL]
  13. A. M. Cardinale, "The opportunity for telehealth to support neurological health care", Telemedicine and e-Health, 24(12), pp.969~978 (2018)[DOI]
  14. M. Colucci, "A “matter of communication”: A new classification to compare and evaluate telehealth and telemedicine interventions and understand their effectiveness as a communication process", Health Informatics Journal, 25(2), pp.446~460 (2019)[DOI]
  15. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, "Announcement of “Temporary non-face-to-face treatment permission measures" (2020), MOHW
  16. Latifi, R., "Increased access to care through telemedicine in Albania : An analysis of 2, 724 patients", Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(2), pp.164~175 (2020)[DOI]
  17. North, S., "Telemedicine in the time of COVID and beyond", The Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(2), pp.145~ (2020)[DOI]
  18. J. Lee, "Social cognitive orientations, social support, and physical activity among at-risk urban children: insights from a structural equation model", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18) (2020)[DOI]
  19. R. C. Plotnikoff, "Physical activity and social cognitive theory", Applied Psychology, 57(4), pp.628~643 (2008)[DOI]
  20. T. Zhou, "Understanding online knowledge community user continuance: A social cognitive theory perspective", Data Technologies and Applications (2018)[DOI]
  21. C. G. Lee, "Social cognitive theory and physical activity among Korean male high-school students", American Journal of Men’s Health, 12(4), pp.973~980 (2018)[DOI]
  22. M. D. Young, "A test of social cognitive theory to explain men's physical activity during a gender-tailored weight loss program", American Journal of Men’s Health (2016)[DOI]
  23. E. Ramirez, "Constructs of physical activity behaviour in children : The usefulness of Social Cognitive Theory", Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3), pp.303~310 (2012)[DOI]
  24. A. Bandura, "Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory" (1986), Prentice Hall
  25. B. J. Ayotte, "Physical Activity in Middle-aged and Young-old Adults", Journal of Health Psychology, 15(2), pp.173~185 (2010)[DOI]
  26. A. Bandura, "Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means", Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), pp.143~164 (2004)[DOI]
  27. A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: The exercise of control" (1997), W. H. Freema
  28. Han, S. Y., "Gender differences in the effect of risk factors on drinking problems in college students", The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 17(4), pp.1003~1019 (2005)
  29. Beeson, E. T., "The development of a collegiate recovery program : Applying social cognitive theory within a social ecological framework", American Journal of Health Education, 48(4), pp.226~239 (2017)[DOI]
  30. D. Wu, "Individual motivation and social influence: a study of telemedicine adoption in China based on social cognitive theory", Health Policy and Technology, 10(3) (2021)[DOI]
  31. Davis, F. D., "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS quarterly, 13(3), pp.319~340 (1989)[DOI]
  32. Y. Lee, "The technology acceptance model : Past, present, and future", Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), pp.50~ (2003)[DOI]
  33. W. R. King, "A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model", Information &Management, 43(6), pp.740~755 (2006)[DOI]
  34. P. Legris, "Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model", Information &Management, 40(3), pp.191~204 (2003)[DOI]
  35. S. J. Kosterink, "Patient acceptance of a telemedicine service for rehabilitation care : A focus group study", International Journal of Medical Informatics, 125, pp.22~29 (2019)[DOI]
  36. S. A. Kamal, "Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM)", Technology in Society, 60 (2020)[DOI]
  37. M. Zhou, "Factors influencing behavior intentions to telehealth by Chinese elderly : An extended TAM model", International Journal of Medical Informatics, 126, pp.118~127 (2019)[DOI]
  38. X. Zhang, "Adoption mechanism of telemedicine in underdeveloped country", Health Informatics Journal, 26(2), pp.1088~1103 (2019)[DOI]
  39. S. Akter, "Modelling the impact of mHealth service quality on satisfaction, continuance and quality of life", Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), pp.1225~1241 (2013)[DOI]
  40. A. S. Grustam, "Cost-effectiveness of telehealth interventions for chronic heart failure patients : a literature review", International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 30(1), pp.59~68 (2014)[DOI]
  41. S. Hennemann, "Drivers and barriers to acceptance of web-based aftercare of patients in inpatient routine care: a cross-sectional survey", Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12) (2016)[DOI]
  42. S. Bakshi, "Understanding barriers of telemedicine adoption: A study in North India", Systems Research and Behavioral Science (2021)[DOI]
  43. P. Brzoska, "Enabling and predisposing factors for the utilization of preventive dental health care in migrants and non-migrants in Germany", Frontiers in Public Health, 5 (2017)[DOI]
  44. T. Heart, "Older adults : are they ready to adopt health-related ICT?", International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(11), pp.209~231 (2013)[DOI]
  45. S. Lee, "Effects of comorbid health conditions on healthcare expenditures among people with severe mental illness", Journal of Mental Health, 25(4), pp.291~296 (2016)[DOI]
  46. L. Li, "Factors associated with older adults' long-term use of wearable activity trackers", Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(6), pp.769~775 (2020)[DOI]
  47. L. Y. Hung, "Health information technology use among older adults in the United States, 2009–2018", Current Medical Research and Opinion, 36(5), pp.789~797 (2020)[DOI]
  48. 강형곤, "헬스케어 웨어러블 기업의 베이비붐 세대 수용 증진 방안에 대한 연구", 기업경영연구, 27(4), pp.129~144 (2020), 한국기업경영학회
  49. M. S. Rahman, "Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy (HTSE)and its influence on individual attitude: An empirical study", Computers in Human Behavior, 58, pp.12~24 (2016)[DOI]
  50. M. H. An, "Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Understand the Factors Influencing Telehealth Utilization After Flattening the COVID-19 Curve in South Korea: Cross-sectional Survey Study", JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(1) (2021)[DOI]
  51. S. H. Kim, "Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance : Adoption of a smartphone by individuals", Information & Management, 45(6), pp.387~393 (2008)[DOI]
  52. 오비앙 메가 데브 복스, "Smartphones Users’Behavioral Intention in a Developing Country in Africa: A Relationship between Social Need, Social Influence, Convenience, Perceived Cost Saving and Perceived Usefulness", 서비스경영학회지, 17(3), pp.89~108 (2016), 한국서비스경영학회[DOI]
  53. Y. K. Dwivedi, "A generalised adoption model for services : A cross-country comparison of mobile health(m-health)", Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), pp.174~187 (2016)[DOI]
  54. S. Bakshi, "Understanding barriers of telemedicine adoption: A study in North India", Systems Research and Behavioral Science (2021)[DOI]
  55. V. Venkatesh, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model : Four longitudinal field studies", Management Science, 46(2), pp.186~204 (2000)[DOI]
  56. P. M. Salkovskis, "The Health Anxiety Inventory : development and validation of scales for the measurement of health anxiety and hypochondriasis", Psychological Medicine, 32(5), pp.843~853 (2002)[DOI]
  57. F. I. Gunasekara, "Comparing self-rated health and self-assessed change in health in a longitudinal survey : which is more valid?", Social Science & Medicine, 74(7), pp.1117~1124 (2012)[DOI]
  58. 2020 Collection of Education Statistics: Higher Education Statistics, "K. J. Lee", Ministry of Education & Korean Educational Development Institute, ~ (2020)
  59. A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy : toward a unifying theory of behavioral change", Psychological Review, 84(2) (1977)[DOI]
  60. S. Dang, "Evaluating the evidence base for the use of home telehealth remote monitoring in elderly with heart failure", Telemedicine and e-Health, 15(8), pp.783~796 (2009)[DOI]
  61. H. K. Andreassen, "Patients who use e-mediated communication with their doctor: new constructions of trust in the patient-doctor relationship", Qualitative Health Research, 16(2), pp.238~248 (2006)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (55건)