본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

로마서 9장은 ‘집단적 선택’을 말하는가? 브라이언 아바시아노의 로마서 9:6-13 해석 비판

Does Romans 9 Teach Corporate Election? Revisiting Brian Abasciano’s Understanding of Romans 9:6-13

김성진
한국개혁신학회 (Korea Reformed Theology Society)|2020.08|한국개혁신학 (Korea Reformed Theology)|제67권 |pp. 237-266|DOI 10.34271/krts.2020.67..237

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

예정론Predestination브라이언 아바시아노로마서 9장집단적 선택구약의 신약 사용Brian AbascianoRomans 9Corporate Electionthe OT Use of the NT

초록

로마서 9장이 ‘개인 선택’(individual election)을 전제한다고 보는 개혁주의 성경학자들과 달리, 브라이언 아바시아노는 최근 저작물에서 로마서 9장이 ‘개인 선택’이 아닌 ‘집단적 선택’(corporate election)을 주로 가르친다고 주장한다. 먼저 그는 바울이 로마서 9장에서 인용하는 구약 본문들이 ‘개인 선택’을 말하고 있지 않다고 주장한다. 나아가 이스라엘의 집단적 사회문화적 환경과 구약의 ‘집단적 연대성’(corporate solidarity)의 개념, 그리고 바울 당대의 헬레니즘 문화 및 유대주의가 바울로 하여금 로마서 9장을 ‘집단적 선택’의 관점으로 기술하게 만들었다고 말한다. 한편 필자는 본 글을 통해 아바시아노의 주장을 반박한다. 첫째, 로마서 9장 6-13절이 인용하는 구약 본문들은 아바시아노의 주장과 달리 모두 ‘개인 선택’을 우선 지지한다. 둘째, 아바시아노가 기술한 이스라엘의 사회문화적 환경 및 구약의 ‘집합적 연대성’에 대한 설명에는 심각한 오류가 있다. 이러한 논의 위에, 아바시아노의 로마서 9장 해석에 오류가 있으며, 개혁주의 해석을 따라 로마서 9장이 ‘개인 선택’을 지지하는 본문으로 보는 것이 옳다고 결론 내린다.

Abstract

Brian Abasciano, in his recent publications on Romans 9, denies the primacy of individual election (or predestination) in Romans 9. Rather, he maintains that the nature of election in Romans 9 is predominately corporate. In support of his view, he deals with three issues: (1) The OT texts that Paul cites in Romans 9:1-18 generally support the corporate election. (2) The socio-cultural milieu of ancient Israel and the OT concept of “corporate solidarity/representation” further strengthen the concept of corporate election in Romans 9. (3) The Hellenistic culture and Judaism of Paul’s day that were dominantly “collectivist rather than individuals” might have shaped Paul’s understanding of election as corporate. This paper, however, finds Abasciano’s interpretation of Romans 9 problematic for the following reasons. (1) His view of corporate election in Genesis 18:10, 14; 21:21 (quoted in Rom 9:7-9) and Genesis 25:3 and Malachi 1:2-3 (cited in Rom 9:10-13) might not be exegetically correct. (2) His claim on the socio-cultural milieu of the OT period and the concept of corporate solidarity/representation is misleading. As a result, many of his reading of Romans 9:6-13 stand on a questionable ground. Contrary to Abasciano argument, therefore, this paper argues that Romans 9 clearly teaches individual election unto salvation.

참고문헌 (76)

  1. Abasciano, Brian J., "Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9.10-18: An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis" (2011), T & T Clark
  2. Abasciano, Brian J., "Clearing up Misconceptions About Corporate Election", ATJ, 41, pp.59~90 (2009)
  3. Abasciano, Brian J., "Corporate Election in Romans 9: A Reply to Thomas Schreiner", JETS, 49(2), pp.351~371 (2006)
  4. Abasciano, Brian J., "Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9.1-9: An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis" (2005), T & T Clark
  5. Abasciano, Brian J., "Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9.1-9: An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis", PhD, pp.2004
  6. Alexander, T. Desmond, "From Paradise to the Promised Land: An Introduction to the Pentateuch" (2012), Baker Academic
  7. Alexander, T. Desmond, "Further Observations on the Term ‘Seed’ in Genesis", TynB, 48(2), pp.363~367 (1997)
  8. Arnold, Bill T., "Genesis. NCBC" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  9. Barrett, C. K., "The Epistle to the Romans. BNTC" (1991), A & N Black
  10. Bergen, Robert D., "1, 2 Samuel. NAC" (1996), B&H Publishers
  11. Bright, John, "A History of Israel" (2000), Westminster John Knox
  12. Brueggemann, Walter, "Genesis. IBC" (1982), Westminster John Knox
  13. Burnett, Gary W., "Paul and the Salvation of the Individual" (2001), Brill
  14. Clark, David J., "A Handbook on Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi. UBS" (2002), United Bible Societies
  15. Collins, C. John, "A Syntactical Note (Genesis 3:15): Is the Woman’s Seed Singular or Plural?", TynB, 48(1), pp.139~148 (1997)
  16. Cranfield, C. E. B., "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. ICC" (1975), T & T Clark
  17. Delitzsch, Franz, "A New Commentary on Genesis. Vol. 2" (1889), T & T Clark
  18. Dunn, James D. G., "Romans 9-16. WBC" (1988), Word Books
  19. Evans, Craig A., "The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation" (2012), Brill
  20. Fitzmyer, Joseph A., "Romans. AB" (2008), Yale University Press
  21. Floyd, Michael H., "Minor Prophets: Part 2. FOTL" (2000), Eerdmans
  22. Gordon, Cyrus H., "Adventures in the Nearest East" (1957), Essential Books
  23. Hallo, William W., "More Essays on the Comparative Method" (1983), Eisenbrauns
  24. Hamilton, James M., "The Seed of the Woman and the Blessing of Abraham", TynB, 58(2), pp.253~273 (2007)
  25. Hartley, John E., "Genesis. NIBC" (2000), Hendrickson
  26. Hay, David M., "Pauline Theology - Volume III: Romans" (1995), Fortress
  27. Hill, Andrew E., "Malachi. AB" (1998), Doubleday
  28. Jewett, Robert, "Romans. Herm" (2007), Fortress
  29. Kaiser, Walter C., "The Promise-Plan of God: A Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments" (2009), Zondervan
  30. Kaiser, Walter C., "Toward Old Testament Ethics" (1991), Zondervan
  31. Kaminsky, Joel S., "Yet I Loved Jacob: Reclaiming the Biblical Concept of Election" (2007), Abingdon
  32. Kaminsky, Joel S., "Reclaiming a Theology of Election: Favoritism and the Joseph Story", PRS, 31(2), pp.135~152 (2004)
  33. Kaminsky, Joel S., "The Sins of the Fathers: A Theological Investigation of the Biblical Tension Between Corporate and Individualized Retribution", Judaism, 46(3), pp.319~332 (1997)
  34. Kaminsky, Joel S., "Corporate Responsibility in the Hebrew Bible" (1995), Sheffield Academic Press
  35. Klein, William W., "The New Chosen People: A Corporate View of Election" (2015), Wipf & Stock
  36. Kruse, Colin G., "Paul’s Letter to the Romans. PNTC" (2012), Eerdmans
  37. Lee, Hansoo, "The Character of God’s Providential Freedom (Romans 9-11)", PTQ, 241, pp.145~162 (1994)
  38. Moo, Douglas J., "The Epistle to the Romans" (1996), Eerdmans
  39. Moran, William L., "Ancient Near Eastern Background of the Love of God in Deuteronomy", CBQ, 25(1), pp.77~87 (1963)
  40. Morris, Leon, "The Epistle to the Romans. PNTC" (1988), Eerdmans
  41. Murray, John, "Epistle to the Romans, Vol. 2. NICNT" (1997), Eerdmans
  42. Myers, J. M., "Biblical Studies in Memory of H. C. Alleman" (1960), J. J. Augustin
  43. Nemet-Nejat, K. R., "Daily Life in Ancient Mesopotamia" (1998), Greenwood
  44. Osborne, Grant R., "Romans. IVPNTC" (2010), IVP Academic
  45. Peake, Arthur S., "The People and the Book: Essays on the Old Testament" (1925), The Clarendon
  46. Petersen, David L., "Zechariah 9-14 and Malachi. OTL" (1995), Westminster John Knox
  47. Piper, John, "The Justification of God: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 9:1-23" (1983), Baker Books
  48. Porter, Joshua Roy, "Legal Aspects of the Concept of Corporate Personality in the Old Testament", VT, 15(3), pp.361~380 (1965)
  49. Porter, Stanley E., "Two Myths: Corporate Personality and Language", Mentality Determinism, 1990, pp.43(3), 289~307
  50. Ramsey, George W., "Is Name-Giving an Act of Domination in Genesis 2:23 and Elsewhere", CBQ, 50(1), pp.24~35 (1988)
  51. Rendtorff, Rolf, "The Problem of the Process of Transmission in the Pentateuch" (1977), JSOT Press
  52. Robinson, H. Wheeler, "Corporate Personality in Ancient Israel" (1980), Fortress
  53. Rogerson, J. W., "Genesis and Exodus" (2001), Sheffield Academic Press
  54. Rogerson, John, "Beginning Old Testament Study" (1982), Westminster
  55. Rogerson, John W., "Hebrew Conception of Corporate Personality: A Re-Examination", JTS, 21(1), pp.1~16 (1970)
  56. Sailhamer, John H., "Genesis. EBC" (1990), Zondervan
  57. Sanders, E. P., "Judaism: Practice and Belief, 63 BCE-66 CE" (1992), SCM
  58. Sarna, Nahum M., "Genesis. JPS" (1989), Jewish Publication Society
  59. Scalise, Pamela J., "Malachi. NIBC" (2009), Hendrickson
  60. Schreiner, Thomas R., "Romans, BECNT" (2018), Baker Books
  61. Schreiner, Thomas R., "Corporate and Individual Election in Romans 9: A Response to Brian Abasciano", JETS, 49(2), pp.373~386 (2006)
  62. Schreiner, Thomas R., "Does Romans 9 Teach Individual Election Unto Salvation? Some Exegetical and Theological Reflections", JETS, 36(1), pp.25~40 (1993)
  63. Schuller, Eileen M., "Malachi. NIB" (1994), Abingdon
  64. Sherwood, Aaron, "The Word of God Has Not Failed: Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9. Studies in Scripture & Biblical Theology" (2015), Lexham
  65. Skinner, John, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Genesis. ICC" (1930), T & T Clark
  66. Smith, Ralph L., "Micah-Malachi. WBC" (1982), Word Books
  67. Snell, Daniel C., "A Companion to the Ancient Near East" (2007), Blackwell
  68. Speiser, E. A., "Genesis. AB" (1964), Doubleday
  69. Verhoef, Pieter A., "The Books of Haggai and Malachi. NICOT" (1987), Eerdmans
  70. Waltke, Bruce K., "Genesis: A Commentary" (2001), Zondervan
  71. Wenham, Gordon J., "Genesis: 16-50. WBC" (1994), Word Books
  72. Westermann, Claus, "Genesis 12-36. ContC" (1995), Fortress
  73. Wilcox, Max, "The Promise of the ‘Seed’ in the New Testament and the Targumin", JSNT, 5, pp.2~20 (1979)
  74. Witherington, Ben, "Paul’s Letter to the Romans: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary" (2004), Eerdmans
  75. Yang, Shin-Hye, "Calvin’s Understanding of Predestinationa", KRTS, 49, pp.101~131 (2016)
  76. Yang, Shin-Hye, "Calvin’s Understanding of Israel as a God’s Chosen People: Romans 9-11", KRTS, 33, pp.13~43 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

바울의 호세아 인용과 이방인 구원이 무슨 상관이 있는가?: 롬 9:25-26에서의 호세아 사용 연구김경식한국복음주의신약학회 · 신약연구2017 · 제16권 제3호Is Romans 9:15 a Hindrance to Missional Motivation?박장훈한국복음주의선교신학회 · 복음과 선교2022 · 제57권 제1호톰 라이트의 바울해석에 대한 새 비판 - 이스라엘의 운명에 관한 톰 라이트의로마서 9-11 해석이 지니는 4가지 문제점박장훈한국복음주의신약학회 · 신약연구2016 · 제15권 제1호로마서 11:25-27에 나타난 ‘온 이스라엘’의 구원김현광한국복음주의신약학회 · 신약연구2016 · 제15권 제4호로마서 11장 25-26절에 나타난 “온 이스라엘”의 용례에 관한 연구남궁영한국복음주의신학회 · 성경과 신학2023 · 제108권 선택된 하나님의 백성으로서의 이스라엘에 대한 칼빈의 이해 -로마서 9-11장을 중심으로-양신혜한국개혁신학회 · 한국개혁신학2012 · 제33권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

복음전도자 김치선 박사의 신학김지훈pp. 8-55김치선의 총회신학교에서의 교육활동과 안양대학교 설립의 의의이은선pp. 56-97새 언약 공동체의 현현(顯現): 고린도전서의 “새 언약”(ἡ καινὴ διαθήκη)에 대한 고찰조호형pp. 98-134문화적 산물의 천국 유입에 대한 팀 켈러의 관점 연구이윤석pp. 135-168바이어하우스의 하나님 나라 사상과 에큐메니칼 유토피아 오류김은홍pp. 169-206
원문 보기