근대일본문학자의 帝國主義的 視覺과 兩価的 態度
The Imperial vision of modern Japanese literary and Ambivalent attitude
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Contempt and that has Horror modern Japanese literature, self-Meiji Restoration (1868), and one, an annexation (1910) through to 36 years under Japanese colonial rule of Korea prayer that is taken. Japanese nationalism and imperialism is a product of modern Western modernity have treaded the path of modernization based on the literature of the modern Japanese nationalism and imperialism also deployed in the inheritance structure of the Japanese Meiji era came the era of nationalism and the West about the advanced civilization of the Orient accept the first intellectuals in Japan seosedongjeom under the international situation of the country's independence, while promoting the establishment of the modern nation-states have recognized the historical vocation. White colonial rulers of the West of the East Desire to dominate prey in front of friends, along with civil scared but the Japanese imperialist colonial rulers Japanese Korean acquaintances as for Mean prey is very Similar. Ambivalence the same target on the opposite relative emotional at the same time, toward a state of mind to say every human being easy for anyone to feel emotions and fear such as yourself and from others to see the various duality means that Japan, Korea, in modern literature at the time as self-sufficiently in the work to find one could watch. Modern Japanese literature, what and how self-reported in South Korea and South Korea for what I think is to investigate Symbol is the purpose of this study. First, one day after the Meiji Restoration and after annexation of Japan's modern literary characters to explore. More times since the Meiji Restoration in 1945 until after the release in Japan on Korea's literary novel syntactic research methods to target the majority of the results has taken the ambivalent attitude of modern Japanese literature is not known to be taken. Mobilized by the imperialist war in modern Japanese literature, the Sino (1937-1945) and the Pacific War (1941 to 1945) with periods of Japanese imperialism, the imperialist war of aggression in modern literaturewho were mobilized ambivalent attitude unless we take the time to survive the threat of feel can not fail to consider the historical circumstances.
Abstract
Contempt and that has Horror modern Japanese literature, self-Meiji Restoration (1868), and one, an annexation (1910) through to 36 years under Japanese colonial rule of Korea prayer that is taken. Japanese nationalism and imperialism is a product of modern Western modernity have treaded the path of modernization based on the literature of the modern Japanese nationalism and imperialism also deployed in the inheritance structure of the Japanese Meiji era came the era of nationalism and the West about the advanced civilization of the Orient accept the first intellectuals in Japan seosedongjeom under the international situation of the country's independence, while promoting the establishment of the modern nation-states have recognized the historical vocation. White colonial rulers of the West of the East Desire to dominate prey in front of friends, along with civil scared but the Japanese imperialist colonial rulers Japanese Korean acquaintances as for Mean prey is very Similar. Ambivalence the same target on the opposite relative emotional at the same time, toward a state of mind to say every human being easy for anyone to feel emotions and fear such as yourself and from others to see the various duality means that Japan, Korea, in modern literature at the time as self-sufficiently in the work to find one could watch. Modern Japanese literature, what and how self-reported in South Korea and South Korea for what I think is to investigate Symbol is the purpose of this study. First, one day after the Meiji Restoration and after annexation of Japan's modern literary characters to explore. More times since the Meiji Restoration in 1945 until after the release in Japan on Korea's literary novel syntactic research methods to target the majority of the results has taken the ambivalent attitude of modern Japanese literature is not known to be taken. Mobilized by the imperialist war in modern Japanese literature, the Sino (1937-1945) and the Pacific War (1941 to 1945) with periods of Japanese imperialism, the imperialist war of aggression in modern literaturewho were mobilized ambivalent attitude unless we take the time to survive the threat of feel can not fail to consider the historical circumstances.
참고문헌 (44)
- 오병우, "나카니시 이노스케의 ｢不逞鮮人｣에 나타난 일본어의 위상", 동북아 문화연구, 1(31), pp.57~74 (2012), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 오병우, "사타 이네코(佐多稻子)의 조선인상", 일본어문학, (32), pp.313~338 (2006), 일본어문학회
- 에드워드 사이드, "오리엔탈리즘", pp.52~ (1991), 교보문고
- 데이비드 허다드, "호미 바바의 탈식민적 정체성", pp.32~ (2011), 앨피
- 김정자, "현대문학과 양가성", pp.12~ (1992), 태학사
- 서기재, "일본근대 「여행안내서」를 통해서 본 조선과 조선관광", 日本語文學, (13), pp.423~440 (2002), 한국일본어문학회
- 양연자, "일제의 대륙침략에 대한 근대 일본 문학자들의 태도", 일본문화연구, (31), pp.289~314 (2009), 동아시아일본학회
- 유상희, "근대 일본 작가들의 조선표상 -1910년대부터 1940년대까지-", 일본문화연구, (35), pp.259~280 (2010), 동아시아일본학회
- 柳相熙, "나카지마 아쓰시(中島敦) 문학작품 속의 朝鮮－？巡査가 있는 風景？을 中心으로－", 日本語文學, (23), pp.365~386 (2004), 한국일본어문학회
- 윤상인, "<나쓰메 신화>와 문명비평-미화와 은폐의 구조, In 나쓰메소세키문학연구", pp.329~ (2001), 제이앤씨
- 정대성, "徳富蘇峰テクストにおける｢朝鮮｣表象ー日本型オリエンタリズムと植民地主義ー", 일본언어문화, 5, pp.295~ (2004), 동아시아일본학회
- 鄭大成, "초기 村山知議의 문학 텍스트 一考 -<근대>의 ‘미궁’속에 비친 <朝鮮>의 ‘얼굴’-", 일어일문학연구, 33, pp.518~ (1998), 한국일어일문학회
- 장남호, "나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의 아시아- ｢만주ㆍ한국의 여기저기｣를 중심으로-", 일본어문학, 6, pp.231~ (1999), 한국일본어문학회
- 이금재, "나쓰메 소세키가 본 한국－｢만주와 한국 기행일기｣를 중심으로－", 일어일문학연구, 77(2), pp.261~281 (2011), 한국일어일문학회
- 노영희, "요시노 사쿠조와 나츠메 소세키의 韓國觀 비교연구 －？滿韓을 시찰하고？와 ？滿韓 여기저기？를 중심으로－", 일어일문학연구, 43, pp.83~98 (2002), 한국일어일문학회
- 노영희, "가네코 후미코의 朝鮮體驗과 思想形成에 관한 고찰-자서전 무엇이 나를 이렇게 만들었던가를 중심으로-", 일어일문학연구, 34, pp.217~ (1999), 한국일어일문학회
- 김선기, "夏目漱石の朝鮮と‘名歌’", 일본문화연구, (25), pp.263~280 (2008), 동아시아일본학회
- 최재철, "일본근대문학자가 본 한국–소오세키와 오오가이의 경우-", 일어일문학연구, 13, pp.377~ (1988), 한국일어일문학회
- 서기재, "高浜虛子의 『朝鮮』연구--「여행안내서」로서의 의의--", 日本語文學, (16) (2003), 한국일본어문학회
- 도꼬로 유미, "高浜虚『朝鮮』 - 虚子の写生文観を中心に -", 日本學硏究, 34(0), pp.319~349 (2011), 일본연구소
- 崔在喆, "日本近代文学者の韓国観の変化過程", 日本學報, 53, pp.7~ (2002), 한국일본학회
- 朴光賢, "유아사 가쓰에 문학에 나타난 식민2세의 조선", 일본학보, (61), pp.487~502 (2004), 한국일본학회
- 허병식, "식민지 조선과 ‘신라’의 심상지리", 비교문학, (41), pp.81~102 (2007), 한국비교문학회
- 허병식, "식민지의 장소, 경주의 표상", 비교문학, (43), pp.185~206 (2007), 한국비교문학회
- 金仙奇, "小衫未醒の 陣中詩篇についての考察-朝鮮認識と反戦意識を中心に -", 日語日文学硏究, 32, pp.294~ (1998), 한국일어일문학회
- 李善玉, "고스기 미세이(小杉未醒)의 韓國像 考察－『陣中詩篇』을 중심으로 －", 日本學硏究, 0(0), pp.45~57 (2003), 일본연구소
- 이선옥, "다나카 히데미쓰(田中 英光) 序？ －작품에 나타난 韓？像을 중심으로－", 일어일문학연구, 45, pp.225~240 (2003), 한국일어일문학회
- 渡辺直紀, "中西伊之助の朝鮮関連の小説について-特に表記言語と人物の遠近化の関係を中心に-", 일본학, 22, pp.267~ (2003), 동국대학교 일본학연구소
- 李京哲, "韓？日 非？？漢字音에 대한 考察", 일어일문학연구, 47(1), pp.421~440 (2003), 한국일어일문학회
- 李秉鎭, "야나기 무네요시(柳宗悅)를 통해본 韓？日文化交流 전망", 일어일문학연구, 56(2), pp.147~164 (2006), 한국일어일문학회
- 김형섭, "田中英光の朝鮮關係作品の一考察", 일본어문학, (32), pp.197~214 (2006), 일본어문학회
- 박상도, "植民地朝鮮を見る三好達治の観点 ―「南鮮雑観」「秋日記」を中心にー", 일본학보, (76), pp.203~215 (2008), 한국일본학회
- 박상도, "三好達治の戰爭槪念", 일어일문학연구, 65(2), pp.63~85 (2008), 한국일어일문학회
- 오석윤, "미요시 다쓰지(三好達治) 詩와 朝鮮 體驗", 일본학보, (60), pp.411~424 (2004), 한국일본학회
- 水野達朗, "転向文学の ｢描写｣と韓国-島木健作の 京城と村山知義の丹青-", 일어일문학연구, 63(2), pp.121~138 (2007), 한국일어일문학회
- 水野達朗, "田中英光『時刻』におけるモダン都市「京城」", 일본학보, 0(71), pp.199~212 (2007), 한국일본학회
- 満田郁夫, "中野重治の文学ーその文学の特徴と朝鮮とー", 일어일문학연구, 36, pp.1~ (2000), 한국일어일문학회
- 서동주, "移動の想像力と朝鮮という他者 ― 昭和初期の中野重治の場合 ―", 일본문화연구, (26), pp.217~239 (2008), 동아시아일본학회
- 오석윤, "小野十三郞の詩にあらわれた韓國人像", 일어일문학연구, 52(2), pp.145~161 (2005), 한국일어일문학회
- 이원희, "이노우에 미츠하루의 초기 작품에 나타난 조선인", 일본어문학, (26), pp.325~344 (2004), 일본어문학회
- 이원희, "고바야시 마사루 문학에 나타난 식민지 조선", 일어일문학연구, 38, pp.229~ (2001), 한국일어일문학회
- 이원희, "가지야마 도시유키(梶山季之)와 조선", 일본어문학, (38), pp.405~422 (2007), 일본어문학회
- 정인문, "한국 이주 일본인문학에 나타난 한국의식", 일본어문학, 1(25), pp.357~382 (2004), 일본어문학회
- 최준호, "고바야시 마사루의 식민지 조선 인식 -초기 작품들 속의 인물표상을 중심으로-", 日本語文學, 1(48), pp.139~156 (2011), 한국일본어문학회