An Analysis on the Ideology of State Affairs and Science-Technology Leadership of Korean Authoritarian Governments
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research is to analyze state affairs’ ideology and science-technology leadership of successive governments from President Lee Seung-man till President Rho Tae-woo in authoritarian period. For this purpose this study performed historical analysis based on literature research. As a result of this analysis, we found that there was corelation between state affairs’ ideology and science-technology leadership of successive governments in authoritarian period. Especially, presidential conception of science and technology influenced the leadership of science and technology directly. To recognize the field of science and technology as the subordinate factor of economy and to focus economic effect through the development of science and technology weakened presidential leadership of science and technology. Strengthening the motor of national growth through the development of science and technology is period stream. Therefore, presidential will and try on the development of science and technology are very important factors in deciding the level of science and technology. President must suggest state affairs’ ideology based on the right conception of science and technology. The presidential leadership of science and technology ought to change according to the transition of period environment. Now the leadership of science and technology which decides policies and pushes ahead with them strongly is not desirable. First of all, we should establish the institution of science and technology systematically in order to show up the leadership of science and technology efficiently.
Abstract
This research is to analyze state affairs’ ideology and science-technology leadership of successive governments from President Lee Seung-man till President Rho Tae-woo in authoritarian period. For this purpose this study performed historical analysis based on literature research. As a result of this analysis, we found that there was corelation between state affairs’ ideology and science-technology leadership of successive governments in authoritarian period. Especially, presidential conception of science and technology influenced the leadership of science and technology directly. To recognize the field of science and technology as the subordinate factor of economy and to focus economic effect through the development of science and technology weakened presidential leadership of science and technology. Strengthening the motor of national growth through the development of science and technology is period stream. Therefore, presidential will and try on the development of science and technology are very important factors in deciding the level of science and technology. President must suggest state affairs’ ideology based on the right conception of science and technology. The presidential leadership of science and technology ought to change according to the transition of period environment. Now the leadership of science and technology which decides policies and pushes ahead with them strongly is not desirable. First of all, we should establish the institution of science and technology systematically in order to show up the leadership of science and technology efficiently.
참고문헌 (18)
- 함성득, "한국 대통령의 과학기술 리더십 연구: 민주화 이전과 이후의 비교론적 관점에서", 한국정치학회보, 46(1), pp.141~173 (2012), 한국정치학회
- 홍용표, "The Evolution of Syngman Rhee's Anti-Communist Policy and the Cold War in the Korean Peninsula", 통일연구, 14(1), pp.63~92 (2010), 국가관리연구원
- T. G. Park, , World Politics, 28(2), pp.203~242 (2007)
- S. D. Hahm, , Science and Technology, 35(8), pp.44~47 (2002)
- G. R. Lee, , Korean Political Science Review, 31(4), pp.89~108 (1997)
- J. S. Yoon, , Research of Social Science, 38(3), pp.201~228 (2012)
- The History of 40 Years on Science and Technology, "Ministry of Science and Technology", Ministry of Science and Technology, ~ (2008)
- B. M. Ahn, , Proceedings of the Korean Association for Public Administration Spring Conference (1998)
- S. J. Kim, "Theories of National Change: The Rise and Fall of the Modern Nation and the Strategic National Management of Korea in the 21st Century" (1994), Bobmunsa
- J. H. Yoon, , Proceedings of Korean Association of Science and Technology Summer Conference (2002)
- J. E. Sung, , Proceedings of the Korean Association for Public Administration Summer Conference (2005)
- 정일준, "박정희 정권기 개발독재 비판―비교역사사회학적 접근", 역사비평, (95), pp.68~92 (2011), 역사문제연구소
- 하태수, "유신 정권 출범기의 정부조직법 개정 분석: 정치경제 배경 중심의 추론과 해석", 한국정책연구, 10(2), pp.419~455 (2010), 경인행정학회
- H. J. Kim, "Theory of Korean Political System" (1997), Parkyoungsa
- 김미나, "과학기술행정의 시스템 전환 및 컨텍스트의 변화 - 과학기술부의 역사적 형성과정을 중심으로-", 행정논총, 43(2), pp.97~130 (2005), 한국행정연구소
- J. O. Lee, , Economy and Society, 6, pp.7~17 (1990)
- J. J. Kil, "President's Economic Leadership: Park Jeong-Hee Chun Doo-hwan Roh Tae-woo Government's Economic Policy Management" (1994), Hankyung
- S. T. Kim, , Proceedings of the Korean Political Science Association Annual Conference (1996)