본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 의관 허준의 임상 의학 사유 엿보기: 『동의보감』에 수록된 임상 사례 및 의안 분석

To Discern the Medical Thoughts of Heo Joon, the Best Physician in Korean History - An Analysis of Disease Experiences and Treatment Cases in the Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine -

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Heo Joon is one of the best-known physicians of the Chosun (朝鮮) Dynasty, the last imperial dynasty (1392~1910) of Korea. He had served King Seonjo (宣祖) during his practice, and has produced many publications on medicine. Then, how did he actually treat the patients? So far, other than the case when he treated Gwanghaegun (光海君)’s smallpox, it is not clearly known how and when he attended and treated the ill. In his most famous book, the Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine (東醫寶鑑, TMEM), he details the physiopathological mechanisms, diagnoses, treatments or prescriptions, and treatment cases, however, it is not clear if they’re from his own clinical experiences. Nevertheless, based on the written method, the original information is reconstituted according to its respective editors of the TMEM, a particular case being included may be considered as an agreement and acceptance of an actual treatment executed. This research analyzes what type of medicinal theory that the main writer Heo Joon employed in his real treatments, as well as how he diagnosed and treated diseases. 301 clinical cases. Here, one may wonder, why does the Section of Inner and External Bodily Elements, that deal with diseases and the structure of the body, have far outnumber cases than the Section of Miscellaneous Disorders? Why does the TMEM introduce the various types of disease experiences and treatment cases, medical cases, simple treatments, nurturing life, materia medica, and also include supernatural phenomena? Why does the TMEM include the experiences and cases from the book published in the Song (宋), Jin (金), Yuan (元) dynasty of China, moreover in the Ming (明) Dynasty of its time. These questions can be answered to the extent that Heo Joon and the others who participated in completing the book sought to justify the new clinical medicine practices, and because it had to be acceptable to the Confucius beliefs which dominated the society, and also because the book came to light in a time when tensions between the pre-existing Chosun medicine and the newly introduced Chinese medicine were evident. Among the clinical cases in the TMEM, there are only 41 cases that can be considered as Medical Cases which include the pathology and treatment mechanism. After analyzing these mechanisms, we were able to discover that they cover not only the theories of the 4 great physicians of Jin-Yuan Dynasty (金元四大家), but also the theories of the Danxi’s Medical Current (丹溪學派), a big trend in the Early Ming Dynasty, and some of the most recent clinical cases that had been just reported at the time. However, Heo Joon did not lean towards a particular theory of medicine; rather, he insisted on establishing a classical medicine (經典醫學) based on the traditional medicinal scriptures such as the Yellow Emperor’s Inner Canon or Shennong’s Classic of Materia Medica, and had created his own Body-Viscera (身形藏府) medicine, as Shin Dongwon’s recent research. Moreover, he successfully secured his own right to be a clinical physician by customizing the amount of medication in prescriptions for the people of Chosun. Heo Joon was one of the chief physicians for the Royal Family of the Chosun Dynasty. Despite the tendency of traditional medicine to lean towards Taoism or Fangshu (方術), for him the most important thing was the actual treatment of diseases. As a result, Heo Joon successfully treated smallpox by utilizing traditional medicinal methods, by breaking the taboo of not using medication on such diseases, as well as he was able to treat an unknown disease, scarlet fever, by discovering the pathological mechanism of the illness. Also he made bold decisions on altering existing prescriptions to treat diseases more efficiently. The TMEM consists of not only justified methods that integrate the different and scattered medicinal and clinical practices, which many insisted their originality, but also was backed with Heo Joon’s such credible and endeavored clinical medicine.

Abstract

Heo Joon is one of the best-known physicians of the Chosun (朝鮮) Dynasty, the last imperial dynasty (1392~1910) of Korea. He had served King Seonjo (宣祖) during his practice, and has produced many publications on medicine. Then, how did he actually treat the patients? So far, other than the case when he treated Gwanghaegun (光海君)’s smallpox, it is not clearly known how and when he attended and treated the ill. In his most famous book, the Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine (東醫寶鑑, TMEM), he details the physiopathological mechanisms, diagnoses, treatments or prescriptions, and treatment cases, however, it is not clear if they’re from his own clinical experiences. Nevertheless, based on the written method, the original information is reconstituted according to its respective editors of the TMEM, a particular case being included may be considered as an agreement and acceptance of an actual treatment executed. This research analyzes what type of medicinal theory that the main writer Heo Joon employed in his real treatments, as well as how he diagnosed and treated diseases. 301 clinical cases. Here, one may wonder, why does the Section of Inner and External Bodily Elements, that deal with diseases and the structure of the body, have far outnumber cases than the Section of Miscellaneous Disorders? Why does the TMEM introduce the various types of disease experiences and treatment cases, medical cases, simple treatments, nurturing life, materia medica, and also include supernatural phenomena? Why does the TMEM include the experiences and cases from the book published in the Song (宋), Jin (金), Yuan (元) dynasty of China, moreover in the Ming (明) Dynasty of its time. These questions can be answered to the extent that Heo Joon and the others who participated in completing the book sought to justify the new clinical medicine practices, and because it had to be acceptable to the Confucius beliefs which dominated the society, and also because the book came to light in a time when tensions between the pre-existing Chosun medicine and the newly introduced Chinese medicine were evident. Among the clinical cases in the TMEM, there are only 41 cases that can be considered as Medical Cases which include the pathology and treatment mechanism. After analyzing these mechanisms, we were able to discover that they cover not only the theories of the 4 great physicians of Jin-Yuan Dynasty (金元四大家), but also the theories of the Danxi’s Medical Current (丹溪學派), a big trend in the Early Ming Dynasty, and some of the most recent clinical cases that had been just reported at the time. However, Heo Joon did not lean towards a particular theory of medicine; rather, he insisted on establishing a classical medicine (經典醫學) based on the traditional medicinal scriptures such as the Yellow Emperor’s Inner Canon or Shennong’s Classic of Materia Medica, and had created his own Body-Viscera (身形藏府) medicine, as Shin Dongwon’s recent research. Moreover, he successfully secured his own right to be a clinical physician by customizing the amount of medication in prescriptions for the people of Chosun. Heo Joon was one of the chief physicians for the Royal Family of the Chosun Dynasty. Despite the tendency of traditional medicine to lean towards Taoism or Fangshu (方術), for him the most important thing was the actual treatment of diseases. As a result, Heo Joon successfully treated smallpox by utilizing traditional medicinal methods, by breaking the taboo of not using medication on such diseases, as well as he was able to treat an unknown disease, scarlet fever, by discovering the pathological mechanism of the illness. Also he made bold decisions on altering existing prescriptions to treat diseases more efficiently. The TMEM consists of not only justified methods that integrate the different and scattered medicinal and clinical practices, which many insisted their originality, but also was backed with Heo Joon’s such credible and endeavored clinical medicine.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. "東醫寶鑑", ~
  2. "明醫雜著", ~
  3. "本草綱目", ~
  4. "辟疫神方", ~
  5. "新纂辟溫方", ~
  6. "諺解痘瘡集要", ~
  7. "歷試漫筆", ~
  8. "醫學入門", ~
  9. "醫林改錯", ~
  10. "역대명의의안"[URL]
  11. "「세조실록·선조실록·광해군일기」, 조선왕조실록"[URL]
  12. "麻科會通"[URL]
  13. "大東野乘"[URL]
  14. 김남일, "韓國醫學史에서의 醫案硏究의 必要性과 意義", 한국의사학회지, 18(2), pp.189~195 (2005), 한국의사학회
  15. 김남일, "東醫寶鑑』의 七情에 대한 一考察", 비폭력연구, 4, pp.99~119 (2010)
  16. 김남일, "東醫寶鑑 의 몸 인식에 대한 一考察", 인문학연구, (18), pp.39~61 (2010), 인문학연구원
  17. 김동율, "『承政院日記』 醫案을 통해 살펴본 景宗의 奇疾에 대한 이해", 한국의사학회지, 26(1), pp.41~53 (2013), 한국의사학회
  18. 金斗鍾, "韓國醫學文化大年表" (1981), 탐구당
  19. 김성수, "신선태을자금단(神仙太乙紫金丹) -조선의 만병통치약-", 인문논총, (67), pp.81~113 (2012), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  20. 김성수, "한 의사의 고백", 의료역사연구회 학술세미나 (2015)
  21. 김성환, "한국 道觀의 철학사상사적 연구(Ⅱ) : 중세편", 도교문화연구, 19, pp.29~72 (2003), 한국도교문화학회
  22. 김영식, "미신과 술수에 대한 정약용의 태도", 다산학, (10), pp.7~54 (2007), 재단법인다산학술문화재단
  23. 김재은, "『神仙太乙紫金丹』에 수록된 李宗準 醫案에 대한 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 25(2), pp.155~162 (2011), 한의병리학회
  24. 김호, "허준의 동의보감 연구" (2003), 일지사
  25. 박상영, "發掘 醫案 고려대학교 소장 『經驗方』에 대하여", 한국의사학회지, 28(1), pp.103~109 (2015), 한국의사학회
  26. 박상영, "經驗醫案 『愚岑雜著』의 肝鬱 治驗例", 한국의사학회지, 25(1), pp.53~60 (2012), 한국의사학회[DOI]
  27. 박석준, "동아시아 전근대 의학과 『동의보감』의 역사적 성격", 박사, 한의학(병리학), pp.2005
  28. 최달영, "『東醫寶鑑』 內景篇에 수록된 의안에 대한 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 19(6), pp.1457~1470 (2005), 한의병리학회
  29. 서근우, "<韓客治驗>에 기재된 의안 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 19(4), pp.62~69 (2006), 대한한의학원전학회
  30. 서영민, "《及幼方》에 收錄된 醫案에 대한 硏究", 동의생리병리학회지, 21(1), pp.18~27 (2007), 한의병리학회
  31. 성호준, "退溪의 心身觀과 <活人心法>", 퇴계학논총, (16), pp.73~92 (2010), 사단법인 퇴계학부산연구원[DOI]
  32. 신동원, "조선 전문가의 일생" (2010), 글항아리
  33. 신동원, "호환마마 천연두" (2013), 돌베게
  34. 신동원, "조선의약생활사 : 환자를 중심으로 본 의료 2000년" (2014), 들녘
  35. 신동원, "동의보감과 동아시아 의학사" (2015), 들녘
  36. 신동원, "역시만필 : 조선 어의 이수귀의 동의보감 실전기" (2015), 들녘
  37. 안상우, "의성허준저작집 5" (2011), 보건복지부
  38. 오재근, "『동의보감』과 『향약집성방』의 『증류본초』 활용 - 『향약집성방』 「향약본초」, 『동의보감』 「탕액편」을 중심으로-", 대한한의학원전학회지, 24(5), pp.107~118 (2011), 대한한의학원전학회
  39. 이경록, "국역의림촬요 1" (2014), 세종대왕기념사업회
  40. 이기복, "의안(醫案)으로 살펴보는 조선후기의 의학 - 실행과정에서 보이는 의학지식에 대한 태도와 행위를 중심으로", 한국과학사학회지, 34(3), pp.429~459 (2012), 한국과학사학회
  41. 이백순, "다시 읽는 미암일기" (2004), 담양군
  42. 이선아, "19세기 고창지방 의원 은수룡이 남긴 경험의안", 한국의사학회지, 18(2), pp.63~91 (2005), 한국의사학회
  43. 정우진, "『동의보감』의 이론적 특성에 관한 연구-한의학과 도교양생론의 긴장관계를 중심으로-", 도교문화연구, 40, pp.187~220 (2014), 한국도교문화학회
  44. 조남호, "{동의보감}의 이론적 구조와 그 성격*- 이론 내적인 특성과 이론 외적인 특성을 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (134), pp.339~361 (2006), 국학연구원
  45. 최봉근, "活人心方과 퇴계철학, 그 의학과 철학의 만남", 양명학, (15), pp.165~198 (2005), 한국양명학회
  46. 하기태 외, "『醫門寶鑑』에 收錄된 醫案에 대한 硏究", 대한한의학회지, 20(4), pp.29~38 (2000)
  47. 한대희, "허준은 살아있다" (2000), 수서원
  48. 홍세영, "『承政院日記』의 臨床醫學 記錄 硏究", 민족문화, 33(33), pp.103~174 (2009), 한국고전번역원
  49. 国家中医药管理局 中华本草编位会, "中華本草 1" (1999), 上海科學技術出版社
  50. 严馀明, "丹溪学说在朝鲜和日本的影响", 中华医史杂志, 41(3), pp.171~ (2011)
  51. 李黎, "《东医宝鉴》的形成与学术特征的探讨", 中国自然医学杂志, 10(1), pp.11~ (2008)
  52. 李零, "中国方术考" (2001), 东方出版社
  53. 田思胜, "朱肱庞安时医学全书" (2006), 中国中医药出版社
  54. 郑金生, "图说中医·中药" (2011), 人民卫生出版社
  55. 陳國慶, "漢書藝文志注釋彙編" (1983), 中華書局
  56. 三木榮, "朝鮮醫學史及疾病史" (1962), 自家出版
  57. Christopher Cullen, "Innovation in Chinese Medicine" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  58. Charlotte Furth, "Thinking with Cases" (2007), University of Hawaii Press
  59. Charlotte Furth, "Thinking with Cases" (2007), University of Hawaii Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)