본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 담화기반문법의 한 시도

An Attempt towards the Discourse-based Grammar of English

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The pedagogical approach to grammar distinguishes between sentence- based grammar and discourse-based grammar and gives priority to the latter. One version of the discourse-based grammar has been suggested by scholars such as Batstone (1994), Carter et al (2000), Close (2002), among others, who claim that the linguistic forms can be chosen depending on contexts where they are uttered. This study, an attempt to implement discourse-based grammar more powerfully, supports the view of grammar as context-based choice by demonstrating that binary oppositions (BO) such as ‘part vs. whole', ‘actual vs. non- actual', etc. can behave as (a source of) crucial context for the choice of grammatical opposite pairs such as ‘-ing vs. to' and grammatical alternative variants such as ‘at vs. in (the restaurant)'. This view is also cognitively supported by the suggestion of BO as derived from ‘categorization principle', which does not belong to isomorphistic iconicity, but to motivational one, in the sense of Haiman (1985).

Abstract

The pedagogical approach to grammar distinguishes between sentence- based grammar and discourse-based grammar and gives priority to the latter. One version of the discourse-based grammar has been suggested by scholars such as Batstone (1994), Carter et al (2000), Close (2002), among others, who claim that the linguistic forms can be chosen depending on contexts where they are uttered. This study, an attempt to implement discourse-based grammar more powerfully, supports the view of grammar as context-based choice by demonstrating that binary oppositions (BO) such as ‘part vs. whole', ‘actual vs. non- actual', etc. can behave as (a source of) crucial context for the choice of grammatical opposite pairs such as ‘-ing vs. to' and grammatical alternative variants such as ‘at vs. in (the restaurant)'. This view is also cognitively supported by the suggestion of BO as derived from ‘categorization principle', which does not belong to isomorphistic iconicity, but to motivational one, in the sense of Haiman (1985).

참고문헌 (52)

  1. 김규현, "담화와 문법: 대화분석적 시각을 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 7(1), pp.155~184 (2000), 담화인지언어학회
  2. 김두식, "영어의 주어-조동사 도치 구문", 언어, 2, pp.217~247 (1987), 한국언어학회
  3. 김두식, "영어의 탈타동사 구문, In 영어문법론", pp.111~170 (2009), 종합출판
  4. 김두식, "대학기초영문법: 담화문법의 시도" (2010), 종합출판
  5. 김두식, "(이분법적 대립을 이용한) 두 갈래식 영어 학습법" (2013), 종합출판`EnG
  6. 김두식, "현대언어학의 흐름", pp.229~352 (2013), 도서출판 동인
  7. 김주식, "의미론의 본질" (2013), 한국문화사
  8. 박근우, "영어담화문법" (1991), 한신문화사
  9. 이원표, "담화분석" (2000), 한국문화사
  10. 정희자, "담화와 문법" (1998), 부산외국어대학교 출판부
  11. Batstone, R., "Grammar" (1994), Oxford University Press
  12. Bolinger, D, "Entailment and the Meaning of Structures", Glossa, 2, pp.119~127 (1968)
  13. Brown, G, "Discourse Analysis" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  14. Carter, R, "Exploring Grammar in Context" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  15. Caton, S. C, "Contributions of Roman Jakobson", Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, pp.223~260 (1987)
  16. Celce-Murcia, M, "Discourse and Context in Language Teaching: A Guide for Language Teachers" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  17. Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  18. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  19. Close, R. A., "A Teachers' Grammar: The Central Problems of English" (2002), Thomson & Heinle
  20. Dik, S., "Functional Grammar" (1978), North Holland Publishing Company
  21. Dik, S., "Functional Grammar, In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics", pp.1318~1323 (1994), Pergamon Press
  22. Dixon, R. M. W., "The Semantic Basis of Syntactic Properties", Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 10, pp.583~593 (1984)
  23. Doyle, G, "Environment Prototypicality Effects on Syntactic Alternation", Oral Presentation at the 2008 Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2008)
  24. Duffley, P. J, "Gerund Versus Infinitive as Complement of Transitive Verbs in English: The Problems of “Tense” and “Control”", Journal of English Linguistics, 28(3), pp.221~248 (2000)
  25. Duffley, P. J, "The Gerund and the to-Infinitive as Subject", Journal of English Linguistics, 31(4), pp.324~352 (2003)
  26. Eastwood, J., "Oxford Practice Grammar (2nd ed.)" (1999), Oxford University Press
  27. Givón, T., "Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 2" (1990), John Benjamins
  28. Givón, T., "Functionalism and Grammar" (1995), John Benjamins
  29. Givón, T., "Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code, In Iconicity in Language", pp.47~76 (1995), John Benjamin
  30. Greenberg, J. H, "Universals of Language(2nd ed)" (1966), MIT Press
  31. Haiman, J, "Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation", Language 56-3, 56(3), pp.515~540 (1980)
  32. Haiman, J., "Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion" (1985), Cambridge University Press
  33. Halliday, M. A. K., "Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning" (1978), Edward Arnold
  34. Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition)" (1994), Edward Arnold
  35. Halliday, M. A. K., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  36. Hawkins, J. A., "Definiteness and Indefiniteness" (1978), Humanities Press
  37. Hiraga, M. K, "Diagrams and Metaphors: Iconic aspects in Language", Journal of Pragmatics, 22, pp.5~21 (1994)
  38. Jespersen, Otto., "A Modern English Grammar, Part V" (1940), Allen and Unwin
  39. Kim, D. S., "“Binary Opposition” as an Iconicity Principle and its Power in Application", Read at the 2013 Spring Conference of the Linguistic Society of Korea, pp.80~81 (2013), Hankook University of Foreign Studies
  40. Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2" (1991), Stanford University Press
  41. Leech, G., "Principles of Pragmatics" (1996), Longman Group Limited
  42. Levin, B., "English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation;영어동사 부류와 교체현상" (2005), The University of Chicago Press;한국문화사
  43. Morgan, J. L, "Some Observations on Discourse and Sentence Grammar", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 11(1), pp.137~144 (1981)
  44. Murphy, R., "Grammar in Use (Intermediate) (3rd ed)" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  45. Newmeyer, F. J., "Language Form and Language Function" (1998), MIT Press
  46. Newmeyer, F. J., "The Discrete Nature of Syntactic Categories: Against a Prototype- based Account, In The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories (Syntax and Semantics, Volume 32)", pp.221~250 (1999), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  47. Penhallurick, J. M, "The Semantics of Auxiliary Do", Studies in Language, 9(3), pp.311~333 (1985)
  48. Swan, M., "Practical English Usage (2nd ed)" (1995), Oxford University Press
  49. Trask, R. L., "A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics" (1993), Routledge
  50. Wierzbicka, A., "The Semantics of Grammar" (1988), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  51. Yule, G., "Pragmatics" (1996), Oxford University Press
  52. Yule, G., "Explaining English Grammar" (1998), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)